Translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric validation of the Persian caregiver empowerment scale for stroke survivors for use in Iran.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kosar Pourhasan, Mohammad Fasih, Parvaneh Vasli
{"title":"Translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric validation of the Persian caregiver empowerment scale for stroke survivors for use in Iran.","authors":"Kosar Pourhasan, Mohammad Fasih, Parvaneh Vasli","doi":"10.1186/s12955-026-02510-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Empowering family caregivers (FCGs) of stroke survivors can improve the quality of care they provide and reduce their stress levels. This study focused on translating, culturally adapting and testing the Persian version of Caregiver Empowerment Scale (CES) for FCGs of stroke survivors. METHODS: This methodological investigation was conducted in two large hospitals in Tehran, Iran, during the 2024–25 academic year. It comprised the following five steps: First, the CES was translated. Secondly, face validity was evaluated with 20 FCGs. Third, content validity was examined with ten experts. Fourthly, construct validity was assessed via exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with 150 and 165 FCGs, respectively. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 26 and the lavaan package in R at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: After translating the CES into Persian, face validity confirmed that all items were clear and consistent, and none required removal. However, a quantitative content validity analysis led to the removal of items 28, 29 and 30 due to a low content validity ratio and index. EFA retained 25 items, which had loadings ranging from 0.438 to 0.918. Two items (1 and 19) were removed because their loadings were below 0.43. Four components were extracted — Personal, Social, Adaptive and Informational Self-Efficacy — explaining 80.66% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed the fit of the four-factor model (TLI = 0.903, df = 266, RMSEA = 0.077, SRMR = 0.065, CFI = 0.914). Cronbach’s alpha, McDonald’s omega coefficients and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were all above 0.90, indicating high reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The findings showed that the Persian version of the 25-item CES for Stroke Survivors is both valid and reliable. This tool allows healthcare providers to evaluate the empowerment of FCGs and identify training requirements for targeted interventions. </p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13185291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-026-02510-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Empowering family caregivers (FCGs) of stroke survivors can improve the quality of care they provide and reduce their stress levels. This study focused on translating, culturally adapting and testing the Persian version of Caregiver Empowerment Scale (CES) for FCGs of stroke survivors. METHODS: This methodological investigation was conducted in two large hospitals in Tehran, Iran, during the 2024–25 academic year. It comprised the following five steps: First, the CES was translated. Secondly, face validity was evaluated with 20 FCGs. Third, content validity was examined with ten experts. Fourthly, construct validity was assessed via exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with 150 and 165 FCGs, respectively. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 26 and the lavaan package in R at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: After translating the CES into Persian, face validity confirmed that all items were clear and consistent, and none required removal. However, a quantitative content validity analysis led to the removal of items 28, 29 and 30 due to a low content validity ratio and index. EFA retained 25 items, which had loadings ranging from 0.438 to 0.918. Two items (1 and 19) were removed because their loadings were below 0.43. Four components were extracted — Personal, Social, Adaptive and Informational Self-Efficacy — explaining 80.66% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed the fit of the four-factor model (TLI = 0.903, df = 266, RMSEA = 0.077, SRMR = 0.065, CFI = 0.914). Cronbach’s alpha, McDonald’s omega coefficients and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were all above 0.90, indicating high reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The findings showed that the Persian version of the 25-item CES for Stroke Survivors is both valid and reliable. This tool allows healthcare providers to evaluate the empowerment of FCGs and identify training requirements for targeted interventions.

伊朗中风幸存者波斯语护理人员赋权量表的翻译、文化适应和心理计量学验证
背景:增强中风幸存者家庭照护者的权能可以提高他们提供的照护质量,降低他们的压力水平。本研究的重点是翻译,文化适应和测试波斯语版本的照顾者赋权量表(CES)为中风幸存者的FCGs。方法:本方法学调查于2024-25学年在伊朗德黑兰的两家大型医院进行。它包括以下五个步骤:首先,翻译CES。其次,采用20张面孔效度量表评估面部效度。再次,请10位专家对内容效度进行检验。第四,采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)分别对150个和165个FCGs进行结构效度评估。数据分析采用SPSS 26和R中的lavaan软件包,显著性水平为0.05。结果:将CES翻译成波斯语后,面部效度证实所有条目清晰一致,无需删除。然而,定量内容效度分析导致项目28、29和30由于内容效度比和指数较低而被删除。EFA保留了25个项目,其负载范围从0.438到0.918。2个项目(1和19)因为它们的负荷低于0.43而被删除。四个组成部分——个人、社会、适应和信息自我效能——解释了总方差的80.66%。验证性因子分析(CFA)证实了四因素模型的拟合性(TLI = 0.903, df = 266, RMSEA = 0.077, SRMR = 0.065, CFI = 0.914)。Cronbach’s alpha、McDonald’s omega系数和类内相关系数(ICC)均在0.90以上,信度较高。结论:研究结果表明,波斯语版25项脑卒中幸存者心理健康量表是有效和可靠的。该工具使医疗保健提供者能够评估FCGs的赋权,并确定有针对性干预措施的培训要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书