Quality and efficacy of alcohol-based hand rubs used in healthcare facilities of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Abayneh Melaku, Tesfaye Admasu, Argaw Ambelu
{"title":"Quality and efficacy of alcohol-based hand rubs used in healthcare facilities of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.","authors":"Abayneh Melaku, Tesfaye Admasu, Argaw Ambelu","doi":"10.1186/s13756-026-01748-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hand hygiene is critical for infection prevention and quality of care. Alcohol-based hand rubs (ABHRs) are widely recommended for their broad antimicrobial activity and ease of use; however, concerns remain regarding product quality and efficacy. This study evaluated the physicochemical properties and antimicrobial performance of ABHRs used in healthcare facilities in Addis Ababa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A laboratory-based experimental design was conducted between May and August 2025. Thirty ABHRs from hospital-produced, locally manufactured, and imported sources were tested using a customized EN 1500 protocol. The volunteers' hands were contaminated with Escherichia coli K12 and treated with 3 mL of the product for 30 s. Pre- and post-treatment bacterial counts were compared, with log<sub>10</sub> reduction factor as the primary outcome. Non-parametric tests (Wilcoxon signed-rank, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U) were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Measured ethanol concentrations ranged from 55 to 86% v/v compared with labeled 60-87% v/v. Nearly one-quarter of hospital-produced and locally manufactured products fell below the WHO minimum of 60% v/v. Antimicrobial testing showed log<sub>10</sub> reductions of 2.63-4.63; 50% achieved the EN 1500 benchmark of ≥ 4 log reduction, 26.7% demonstrated moderate efficacy (3-<4 log reduction), and 23.3% fell below 3 log reduction. Imported formulations (73-86% v/v; median 79% v/v) consistently achieved ≥ 4 log reductions, significantly outperforming hospital-produced (p = 0.009) and locally manufactured products (p = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One-fourth of ABHRs and half of the tested products failed to meet the WHO concentration and EN 1500 efficacy benchmarks. Policymakers, hospital administrators, and the Ethiopian Food and Drug Authority must urgently establish mandatory quality audit systems and enforce strict adherence to international guidelines to safeguard healthcare workers, patients, and infection prevention efforts in Ethiopia.</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13185281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-026-01748-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hand hygiene is critical for infection prevention and quality of care. Alcohol-based hand rubs (ABHRs) are widely recommended for their broad antimicrobial activity and ease of use; however, concerns remain regarding product quality and efficacy. This study evaluated the physicochemical properties and antimicrobial performance of ABHRs used in healthcare facilities in Addis Ababa.

Methods: A laboratory-based experimental design was conducted between May and August 2025. Thirty ABHRs from hospital-produced, locally manufactured, and imported sources were tested using a customized EN 1500 protocol. The volunteers' hands were contaminated with Escherichia coli K12 and treated with 3 mL of the product for 30 s. Pre- and post-treatment bacterial counts were compared, with log10 reduction factor as the primary outcome. Non-parametric tests (Wilcoxon signed-rank, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U) were applied.

Results: Measured ethanol concentrations ranged from 55 to 86% v/v compared with labeled 60-87% v/v. Nearly one-quarter of hospital-produced and locally manufactured products fell below the WHO minimum of 60% v/v. Antimicrobial testing showed log10 reductions of 2.63-4.63; 50% achieved the EN 1500 benchmark of ≥ 4 log reduction, 26.7% demonstrated moderate efficacy (3-<4 log reduction), and 23.3% fell below 3 log reduction. Imported formulations (73-86% v/v; median 79% v/v) consistently achieved ≥ 4 log reductions, significantly outperforming hospital-produced (p = 0.009) and locally manufactured products (p = 0.047).

Conclusion: One-fourth of ABHRs and half of the tested products failed to meet the WHO concentration and EN 1500 efficacy benchmarks. Policymakers, hospital administrators, and the Ethiopian Food and Drug Authority must urgently establish mandatory quality audit systems and enforce strict adherence to international guidelines to safeguard healthcare workers, patients, and infection prevention efforts in Ethiopia.

埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴医疗机构使用的含酒精洗手液的质量和功效。
背景:手部卫生对感染预防和护理质量至关重要。基于酒精的洗手液(abhr)因其广泛的抗菌活性和易于使用而被广泛推荐;然而,对产品质量和功效的担忧仍然存在。本研究评估了亚的斯亚贝巴医疗机构中使用的abhr的理化性质和抗菌性能。方法:于2025年5月~ 8月进行室内实验设计。使用定制的EN 1500协议对来自医院生产、当地制造和进口来源的30个abhr进行了测试。志愿者的手被大肠杆菌K12污染,用3ml的产品处理30秒。比较治疗前和治疗后的细菌计数,以log10减少因子作为主要结局。采用非参数检验(Wilcoxon signed-rank、Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U)。结果:与标记的60-87% v/v相比,测得的乙醇浓度范围为55 - 86% v/v。近四分之一的医院生产和当地制造的产品低于世卫组织60% v/v的最低标准。抗菌测试显示log10降低2.63-4.63;50%达到en1500基准≥4 log降低,26.7%表现出中等疗效(3-结论:四分之一的abhr和一半的测试产品未能达到WHO浓度和EN 1500功效基准。决策者、医院管理者和埃塞俄比亚食品和药物管理局必须紧急建立强制性质量审核体系,并严格遵守国际准则,以保护埃塞俄比亚的医护人员、患者和感染预防工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
140
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control is a global forum for all those working on the prevention, diagnostic and treatment of health-care associated infections and antimicrobial resistance development in all health-care settings. The journal covers a broad spectrum of preeminent practices and best available data to the top interventional and translational research, and innovative developments in the field of infection control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书