Fast arrival-time modelling of dike breach floods for effective disaster management

IF 3.8 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Progress in Disaster Science Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-07 DOI:10.1016/j.pdisas.2026.100565
Leon S. Besseling, Anouk Bomers, Jord J. Warmink, Suzanne J.M.H. Hulscher
{"title":"Fast arrival-time modelling of dike breach floods for effective disaster management","authors":"Leon S. Besseling,&nbsp;Anouk Bomers,&nbsp;Jord J. Warmink,&nbsp;Suzanne J.M.H. Hulscher","doi":"10.1016/j.pdisas.2026.100565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Modelling of flood arrival times after a dike breach is essential for efficient flood disaster management, shaping evacuation strategies and effective disaster response. However, common hydrodynamic models remain too computationally expensive for real-time flood forecasting, while current surrogate models have so far not been able to simulate flood arrival times for dike breaches. In this study, we develop a fast conceptual model for this purpose, based on a digital elevation model and a linear regression equation for flood propagation velocity. The linear regression was derived from a sensitivity analysis of hydrodynamic simulations of idealized dike breaches, where we identify the most important hinterland characteristics that determine the flood propagation velocity. The sensitivity analysis shows that hinterland slope in the propagation direction is most important for the propagation velocity, while breach discharge is most important close to the breach. The fast conceptual model computes flood arrival times by applying this linear regression along the local drainage direction (steepest slope) path leading away from the breach, taking peak breach discharge as input. The model achieves accurate results for two case study dike breaches along the Rhine river near the Dutch–German border, especially in the first 48 h after the breach. The mean absolute arrival time error is about 2 to 4 h, and computation time is less than a second. We conclude that this model can serve as a fast disaster preparation and response tool to support flood disaster management, for determining evacuation strategies and uncertainty analysis of possible breach discharge scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52341,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Disaster Science","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 100565"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Disaster Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061726000517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modelling of flood arrival times after a dike breach is essential for efficient flood disaster management, shaping evacuation strategies and effective disaster response. However, common hydrodynamic models remain too computationally expensive for real-time flood forecasting, while current surrogate models have so far not been able to simulate flood arrival times for dike breaches. In this study, we develop a fast conceptual model for this purpose, based on a digital elevation model and a linear regression equation for flood propagation velocity. The linear regression was derived from a sensitivity analysis of hydrodynamic simulations of idealized dike breaches, where we identify the most important hinterland characteristics that determine the flood propagation velocity. The sensitivity analysis shows that hinterland slope in the propagation direction is most important for the propagation velocity, while breach discharge is most important close to the breach. The fast conceptual model computes flood arrival times by applying this linear regression along the local drainage direction (steepest slope) path leading away from the breach, taking peak breach discharge as input. The model achieves accurate results for two case study dike breaches along the Rhine river near the Dutch–German border, especially in the first 48 h after the breach. The mean absolute arrival time error is about 2 to 4 h, and computation time is less than a second. We conclude that this model can serve as a fast disaster preparation and response tool to support flood disaster management, for determining evacuation strategies and uncertainty analysis of possible breach discharge scenarios.
堤防决口洪水快速到达时间模型的有效灾害管理
堤防决口后洪水到达时间的建模对于有效的洪水灾害管理、制定疏散策略和有效的灾害响应至关重要。然而,对于实时洪水预报来说,普通的水动力模型在计算上仍然过于昂贵,而目前的替代模型到目前为止还不能模拟堤坝决口的洪水到达时间。在本研究中,我们基于数字高程模型和洪水传播速度的线性回归方程,为此开发了一个快速概念模型。线性回归来源于对理想决口水动力模拟的敏感性分析,其中我们确定了决定洪水传播速度的最重要的腹地特征。敏感性分析表明,传播方向的腹地坡度对传播速度影响最大,而靠近裂口的裂口流量对传播速度影响最大。快速概念模型以裂口峰值流量为输入,沿着局部排水方向(最陡坡)路径应用线性回归计算洪水到达时间。该模型对靠近荷德边境的莱茵河堤防决口的两个案例研究,特别是在决口后的头48小时内,获得了准确的结果。平均绝对到达时间误差约为2 ~ 4 h,计算时间小于1秒。该模型可作为支持洪水灾害管理的快速备灾和响应工具,用于确定疏散策略和可能决口排放情景的不确定性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in Disaster Science
Progress in Disaster Science Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
51
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Disaster Science is a Gold Open Access journal focusing on integrating research and policy in disaster research, and publishes original research papers and invited viewpoint articles on disaster risk reduction; response; emergency management and recovery. A key part of the Journal's Publication output will see key experts invited to assess and comment on the current trends in disaster research, as well as highlight key papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书