Positive effects of brief body exercises on mood: An interventional EMA study

IF 3
Neuroscience Applied Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-06 DOI:10.1016/j.nsa.2026.106999
Lea Nitzpon , Johanna Rehder , Richard Hohmann , Carlotta Kunst , Rika Gross , Claudio R. Nigg , Markus Reichert , Marcus Müller
{"title":"Positive effects of brief body exercises on mood: An interventional EMA study","authors":"Lea Nitzpon ,&nbsp;Johanna Rehder ,&nbsp;Richard Hohmann ,&nbsp;Carlotta Kunst ,&nbsp;Rika Gross ,&nbsp;Claudio R. Nigg ,&nbsp;Markus Reichert ,&nbsp;Marcus Müller","doi":"10.1016/j.nsa.2026.106999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Short bouts of physical activity in daily life are associated with affective well-being and may promote mental health. However, the causality and differential effects of distinct physical activity types remain unknown. This study investigated how different brief exercises (cardio, fascia training, breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, yoga, body awareness) influence three mood dimensions: energetic arousal, valence and calmness. Using an interventional Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) design, we assessed momentary mood states before and after brief smartphone-based exercise intervention in daily life of 100 participants (females = 52, males = 48, mean age = 32.83). We found overall positive within-person effects of the intervention on energetic arousal (b = 1.69, <em>p</em> = .06), valence (b = 1.80, <em>p</em> &lt; .001) and calmness (b = 9.29, <em>p</em> &lt; .001). Furthermore, results showed that within-person pre-intervention negative mood served as a significant moderator, i.e., energetic arousal increased (b = .19, <em>p</em> = .04), while the effect on calmness (b = .12, <em>p</em> = .06) remained stable across mood states. For valence, the benefit of the intervention slightly attenuated when momentary negative mood was high (b = −.11, <em>p</em> = .04). In addition, specific exercise types produced differential effects: energetic arousal increased most following cardio and fascia training, while calmness increased across all exercise types. Improvements in valence were most pronounced in breathing, yoga, and fascia training. These findings suggest that individualized exercise selection may differentially influence mood responses and highlight the potential of targeted, context-sensitive interventions to optimize affective well-being in daily life. If replicated in patient samples, the findings promise high value for the prevention and intervention of mental health, especially for affective disorders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100952,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Applied","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 106999"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Applied","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772408526001183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Short bouts of physical activity in daily life are associated with affective well-being and may promote mental health. However, the causality and differential effects of distinct physical activity types remain unknown. This study investigated how different brief exercises (cardio, fascia training, breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, yoga, body awareness) influence three mood dimensions: energetic arousal, valence and calmness. Using an interventional Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) design, we assessed momentary mood states before and after brief smartphone-based exercise intervention in daily life of 100 participants (females = 52, males = 48, mean age = 32.83). We found overall positive within-person effects of the intervention on energetic arousal (b = 1.69, p = .06), valence (b = 1.80, p < .001) and calmness (b = 9.29, p < .001). Furthermore, results showed that within-person pre-intervention negative mood served as a significant moderator, i.e., energetic arousal increased (b = .19, p = .04), while the effect on calmness (b = .12, p = .06) remained stable across mood states. For valence, the benefit of the intervention slightly attenuated when momentary negative mood was high (b = −.11, p = .04). In addition, specific exercise types produced differential effects: energetic arousal increased most following cardio and fascia training, while calmness increased across all exercise types. Improvements in valence were most pronounced in breathing, yoga, and fascia training. These findings suggest that individualized exercise selection may differentially influence mood responses and highlight the potential of targeted, context-sensitive interventions to optimize affective well-being in daily life. If replicated in patient samples, the findings promise high value for the prevention and intervention of mental health, especially for affective disorders.
短暂的身体锻炼对情绪的积极影响:一项介入性EMA研究
日常生活中短暂的身体活动与情感健康有关,并可能促进心理健康。然而,不同体育活动类型的因果关系和差异影响仍然未知。这项研究调查了不同的简短运动(有氧运动、筋膜训练、呼吸、渐进式肌肉放松、瑜伽、身体意识)如何影响三个情绪维度:能量唤醒、价态和平静。采用介入性生态瞬间评估(EMA)设计,我们评估了100名参与者(女性52人,男性48人,平均年龄32.83岁)在日常生活中基于智能手机的简短运动干预前后的瞬间情绪状态。我们发现,干预在能量唤醒(b = 1.69, p = 0.06)、效价(b = 1.80, p < 0.001)和平静(b = 9.29, p < 0.001)方面的总体积极影响。此外,研究结果显示,干预前的负性情绪对情绪状态的调节作用显著,即能量唤醒增加(b = .19, p = .04),而对平静的影响(b = .12, p = .06)保持稳定。效价方面,当瞬间负性情绪高时,干预的效益略有减弱(b =−)。11, p = .04)。此外,特定的运动类型会产生不同的效果:在有氧和筋膜训练之后,精力充沛的觉醒程度增加最多,而在所有的运动类型中,平静度都增加了。效价的改善在呼吸、瑜伽和筋膜训练中最为明显。这些发现表明,个性化的运动选择可能会对情绪反应产生不同的影响,并强调了有针对性的、情境敏感的干预措施在优化日常生活中的情感幸福感方面的潜力。如果在患者样本中复制,该研究结果对心理健康的预防和干预具有很高的价值,特别是对情感性障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书