Assessing endometrial microbiota in endometriosis: culturomics and sequencing analysis of receptive-phase tissue

IF 5.6 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Current Research in Microbial Sciences Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.crmicr.2026.100593
A. Canha-Gouveia , C.M. Tenorio , T. Rööp , S. Kõljalg , I. Smidt , E. Sepp , J. Štšepetova , M. Saare , S. Vela , I. Pérez-Prieto , E. Vargas , J. Mozas , A. Clavero , A. Sola-Leyva , A. Salumets , R. Mändar , S. Altmäe
{"title":"Assessing endometrial microbiota in endometriosis: culturomics and sequencing analysis of receptive-phase tissue","authors":"A. Canha-Gouveia ,&nbsp;C.M. Tenorio ,&nbsp;T. Rööp ,&nbsp;S. Kõljalg ,&nbsp;I. Smidt ,&nbsp;E. Sepp ,&nbsp;J. Štšepetova ,&nbsp;M. Saare ,&nbsp;S. Vela ,&nbsp;I. Pérez-Prieto ,&nbsp;E. Vargas ,&nbsp;J. Mozas ,&nbsp;A. Clavero ,&nbsp;A. Sola-Leyva ,&nbsp;A. Salumets ,&nbsp;R. Mändar ,&nbsp;S. Altmäe","doi":"10.1016/j.crmicr.2026.100593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Endometriosis has been associated with alterations in the reproductive tract microbiota, yet studies focusing on the endometrial microbiome remain inconsistent, partly due to the low-biomass nature of this niche and methodological heterogeneity. In this prospective pilot study, we investigated whether the receptive-phase endometrial microbiota differs between women with and without endometriosis using a combined culturomics and 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach. Endometrial samples were collected from 20 women undergoing fertility assessment, including 10 women with a previous diagnosis of endometriosis and 10 controls with male factor infertility. Biopsies were used for culturomics and Tao brush samples for sequencing, both obtained during the mid-secretory phase. Viable bacterial growth was recovered from 19 of 20 biopsies, yielding approximately 2500 colonies corresponding to 40 non-redundant species. Direct plating and aerobic pre-incubation shared around 45% of detected species, with pre-incubation enhancing species recovery but limiting quantitative comparisons. Bacterial load estimated from direct cultures showed wide inter-individual variability and no significant differences between groups, consistent with 16S rRNA gene sequencing results, which also revealed no clear differences in microbial diversity or overall community composition within this cohort. Only a limited overlap was observed between taxa detected by culture and sequencing, highlighting the complementarity and methodological biases of each approach. Overall, this study demonstrates the feasibility of recovering viable bacteria from receptive-phase endometrial samples and supports the combined use of culturomics and sequencing as complementary tools for studying microbiota in low-biomass uterine environments. These findings should, however, be interpreted considering the exploratory design and limited sample size.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34305,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Microbial Sciences","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100593"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Microbial Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666517426000489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endometriosis has been associated with alterations in the reproductive tract microbiota, yet studies focusing on the endometrial microbiome remain inconsistent, partly due to the low-biomass nature of this niche and methodological heterogeneity. In this prospective pilot study, we investigated whether the receptive-phase endometrial microbiota differs between women with and without endometriosis using a combined culturomics and 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach. Endometrial samples were collected from 20 women undergoing fertility assessment, including 10 women with a previous diagnosis of endometriosis and 10 controls with male factor infertility. Biopsies were used for culturomics and Tao brush samples for sequencing, both obtained during the mid-secretory phase. Viable bacterial growth was recovered from 19 of 20 biopsies, yielding approximately 2500 colonies corresponding to 40 non-redundant species. Direct plating and aerobic pre-incubation shared around 45% of detected species, with pre-incubation enhancing species recovery but limiting quantitative comparisons. Bacterial load estimated from direct cultures showed wide inter-individual variability and no significant differences between groups, consistent with 16S rRNA gene sequencing results, which also revealed no clear differences in microbial diversity or overall community composition within this cohort. Only a limited overlap was observed between taxa detected by culture and sequencing, highlighting the complementarity and methodological biases of each approach. Overall, this study demonstrates the feasibility of recovering viable bacteria from receptive-phase endometrial samples and supports the combined use of culturomics and sequencing as complementary tools for studying microbiota in low-biomass uterine environments. These findings should, however, be interpreted considering the exploratory design and limited sample size.

Abstract Image

评估子宫内膜异位症的子宫内膜微生物群:接受期组织的培养组学和测序分析
子宫内膜异位症与生殖道微生物群的改变有关,但关注子宫内膜微生物群的研究仍然不一致,部分原因是该生态位的低生物量性质和方法异质性。在这项前瞻性先导研究中,我们使用联合培养组学和16S rRNA基因测序方法研究了子宫内膜异位症患者和非子宫内膜异位症患者接受期子宫内膜微生物群是否存在差异。从20名接受生育评估的女性中收集子宫内膜样本,其中10名之前诊断为子宫内膜异位症的女性和10名男性因素不育的对照组。活检用于培养组学和陶刷样本测序,均在分泌中期获得。20个活组织检查中有19个恢复了活菌生长,产生约2500个菌落,对应40个非冗余物种。直接电镀和有氧预孵育共有约45%的检测物种,预孵育促进了物种恢复,但限制了定量比较。从直接培养中估计的细菌负荷显示出广泛的个体间差异,组间无显著差异,这与16S rRNA基因测序结果一致,该结果也显示该队列中微生物多样性或整体群落组成没有明显差异。通过培养和测序检测到的分类群之间只有有限的重叠,突出了每种方法的互补性和方法偏差。总的来说,本研究证明了从接受期子宫内膜样品中回收活菌的可行性,并支持将培养组学和测序相结合,作为研究低生物量子宫环境中微生物群的补充工具。然而,考虑到探索性设计和有限的样本量,这些发现应该被解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Research in Microbial Sciences
Current Research in Microbial Sciences Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology and Microbiology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书