Trends over time and risk factors in inappropriate prescribing in older adults with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: a longitudinal secondary analysis of the OPERAM trial.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Swiss medical weekly Pub Date : 2026-02-12 DOI:10.57187/4892
Jonathan Huschka, Katharina Tabea Jungo, Valerie Aponte Ribero, Lara Brockhus, Denis O'Mahony, Mary Randles, Sophie Marien, Clara Drenth, Anne Spinewine, Wilma Knol, Drahomir Aujesky, Nicolas Rodondi, Carole E Aubert
{"title":"Trends over time and risk factors in inappropriate prescribing in older adults with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: a longitudinal secondary analysis of the OPERAM trial.","authors":"Jonathan Huschka, Katharina Tabea Jungo, Valerie Aponte Ribero, Lara Brockhus, Denis O'Mahony, Mary Randles, Sophie Marien, Clara Drenth, Anne Spinewine, Wilma Knol, Drahomir Aujesky, Nicolas Rodondi, Carole E Aubert","doi":"10.57187/4892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Polypharmacy is common among older adults and associated with potentially inappropriate medications and potential prescribing omissions, which together constitute potentially inappropriate prescriptions, contributing to adverse outcomes and increased healthcare costs. Longitudinal data on potentially inappropriate prescriptions and differences across living environments are limited. Our aim was to analyse patterns and determinants of potentially inappropriate prescriptions in multimorbid, older adults across different living environments and their trends over 12 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the control group (n = 1045) of the multi-country OPERAM trial (December 2015 - October 2018), a cluster-randomised controlled trial including older adults aged ≥70 years with ≥3 chronic conditions and ≥5 medications, which tested a software intervention to improve prescribing in these patients. The control group received pharmaceutical care in accordance with usual care. STOPP/START criteria were applied to detect potentially inappropriate prescriptions at hospital admission, discharge, and at 2-, 6- and 12-month follow-up. The outcomes were a priori defined as the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions at hospital admission, differences in potentially inappropriate prescriptions between living settings (nursing home versus community-dwelling) and number of medications (polypharmacy [5-9 medications] versus hyperpolypharmacy [≥10 medications]), changes in potentially inappropriate prescriptions over the 12-month follow-up and factors associated with potentially inappropriate prescriptions. Analyses included descriptive statistics and multivariable regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At admission, 664 (63.5%) patients had ≥1 potentially inappropriate medication and 754 (72.1%) had ≥1 potential prescribing omission. Potentially inappropriate prescriptions at admission were most strongly associated with hyperpolypharmacy (potentially inappropriate medication: incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.54, 95% CI 1.35-1.76) and cognitive impairment (potentially inappropriate medication: IRR 1.44, 95% CI 1.16-1.79), and were also significantly associated with female sex, number of comorbidities, fall history, nursing home residency and older age. Although overall prevalence remained stable over 12 months, substantial individual-level changes occurred, with many patients experiencing increases or decreases in the number of potentially inappropriate medications or potential prescribing omissions, alongside notable shifts in specific potentially inappropriate medications/potential prescribing omissions. An increasing number of potentially inappropriate prescriptions over time was mostly associated with hyperpolypharmacy (potential prescribing omission: OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.20-2.42 at 12 months) and nursing home residency (potentially inappropriate medication: OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.12-3.36 at 12 months), while significant associations were found for fall history and number of comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Potentially inappropriate prescriptions remain highly prevalent in multimorbid, older adults and do not clearly improve over time. Frequent changes at patient level and dynamic shifts in specific potentially inappropriate medications/potential prescribing omissions over time underscore the need for individualised, continuous medication reviews addressing both over- and underprescribing. Factors associated with increasing potentially inappropriate prescriptions over time may serve as indicators of high-risk patients and highlight the need for targeted interventions and further research.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>This study is based on data from the OPERAM trial, which was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02986425).</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":"156 ","pages":"4892"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/4892","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Polypharmacy is common among older adults and associated with potentially inappropriate medications and potential prescribing omissions, which together constitute potentially inappropriate prescriptions, contributing to adverse outcomes and increased healthcare costs. Longitudinal data on potentially inappropriate prescriptions and differences across living environments are limited. Our aim was to analyse patterns and determinants of potentially inappropriate prescriptions in multimorbid, older adults across different living environments and their trends over 12 months.

Methods: We used data from the control group (n = 1045) of the multi-country OPERAM trial (December 2015 - October 2018), a cluster-randomised controlled trial including older adults aged ≥70 years with ≥3 chronic conditions and ≥5 medications, which tested a software intervention to improve prescribing in these patients. The control group received pharmaceutical care in accordance with usual care. STOPP/START criteria were applied to detect potentially inappropriate prescriptions at hospital admission, discharge, and at 2-, 6- and 12-month follow-up. The outcomes were a priori defined as the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions at hospital admission, differences in potentially inappropriate prescriptions between living settings (nursing home versus community-dwelling) and number of medications (polypharmacy [5-9 medications] versus hyperpolypharmacy [≥10 medications]), changes in potentially inappropriate prescriptions over the 12-month follow-up and factors associated with potentially inappropriate prescriptions. Analyses included descriptive statistics and multivariable regression.

Results: At admission, 664 (63.5%) patients had ≥1 potentially inappropriate medication and 754 (72.1%) had ≥1 potential prescribing omission. Potentially inappropriate prescriptions at admission were most strongly associated with hyperpolypharmacy (potentially inappropriate medication: incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.54, 95% CI 1.35-1.76) and cognitive impairment (potentially inappropriate medication: IRR 1.44, 95% CI 1.16-1.79), and were also significantly associated with female sex, number of comorbidities, fall history, nursing home residency and older age. Although overall prevalence remained stable over 12 months, substantial individual-level changes occurred, with many patients experiencing increases or decreases in the number of potentially inappropriate medications or potential prescribing omissions, alongside notable shifts in specific potentially inappropriate medications/potential prescribing omissions. An increasing number of potentially inappropriate prescriptions over time was mostly associated with hyperpolypharmacy (potential prescribing omission: OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.20-2.42 at 12 months) and nursing home residency (potentially inappropriate medication: OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.12-3.36 at 12 months), while significant associations were found for fall history and number of comorbidities.

Conclusion: Potentially inappropriate prescriptions remain highly prevalent in multimorbid, older adults and do not clearly improve over time. Frequent changes at patient level and dynamic shifts in specific potentially inappropriate medications/potential prescribing omissions over time underscore the need for individualised, continuous medication reviews addressing both over- and underprescribing. Factors associated with increasing potentially inappropriate prescriptions over time may serve as indicators of high-risk patients and highlight the need for targeted interventions and further research.

Study registration: This study is based on data from the OPERAM trial, which was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02986425).

多病多药老年人不当处方的长期趋势和风险因素:对OPERAM试验的纵向二次分析
研究背景和目的:多种用药在老年人中很常见,并与潜在的不适当用药和潜在的处方遗漏相关,这些因素共同构成潜在的不适当处方,导致不良后果和医疗费用增加。关于可能不适当的处方和生活环境差异的纵向数据有限。我们的目的是分析不同生活环境中患有多种疾病的老年人潜在不适当处方的模式和决定因素及其在12个月内的趋势。方法:我们使用来自多国OPERAM试验(2015年12月至2018年10月)的对照组(n = 1045)的数据,这是一项集群随机对照试验,包括年龄≥70岁,患有≥3种慢性病和≥5种药物的老年人,该试验测试了软件干预以改善这些患者的处方。对照组患者按常规护理方式给予药学护理。应用STOPP/START标准在入院、出院以及2、6和12个月随访时检测可能不适当的处方。结果被先验地定义为住院时潜在不适当处方的患病率,生活环境(疗养院与社区住宅)之间潜在不适当处方的差异,药物数量(多种药物[5-9种药物]与过度多种药物[≥10种药物]),12个月随访期间潜在不适当处方的变化以及与潜在不适当处方相关的因素。分析包括描述性统计和多变量回归。结果:入院时,664例(63.5%)患者存在≥1种潜在不适宜用药,754例(72.1%)患者存在≥1种潜在疏漏用药。入院时潜在不适当的处方与过量用药(潜在不适当用药:发病率比[IRR] 1.54, 95% CI 1.35-1.76)和认知障碍(潜在不适当用药:IRR 1.44, 95% CI 1.16-1.79)密切相关,并且与女性、合并症数量、跌倒史、养老院居住和年龄显著相关。尽管总体患病率在12个月内保持稳定,但个人层面发生了重大变化,许多患者可能不适当的药物或潜在的处方遗漏数量增加或减少,同时特定的潜在不适当药物/潜在的处方遗漏也发生了显著变化。随着时间的推移,潜在的不适当处方数量的增加主要与多药(潜在的处方遗漏:OR 1.71, 12个月时95% CI 1.20-2.42)和养老院居住(潜在的不适当用药:OR 1.94, 12个月时95% CI 1.12-3.36)有关,而跌倒史和合并症的数量也有显著的关联。结论:潜在的不当处方在多病老年人中仍然非常普遍,并且随着时间的推移没有明显改善。随着时间的推移,患者层面的频繁变化和特定可能不适当的药物/潜在的处方遗漏的动态变化强调了个性化、持续的药物审查的必要性,以解决处方过量和不足的问题。随着时间的推移,与潜在不适当处方增加相关的因素可以作为高风险患者的指标,并强调有针对性的干预和进一步研究的必要性。研究注册:本研究基于OPERAM试验的数据,该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02986425)注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书