Clinical resuscitation management of non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) in Swiss emergency centres: a survey study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Swiss medical weekly Pub Date : 2026-03-31 DOI:10.57187/4645
Luisa Steiner, Sabrina Lanz, Manuela Iten, Beat Lehmann, Aristomenis K Exadaktylos, Martin Müller
{"title":"Clinical resuscitation management of non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) in Swiss emergency centres: a survey study.","authors":"Luisa Steiner, Sabrina Lanz, Manuela Iten, Beat Lehmann, Aristomenis K Exadaktylos, Martin Müller","doi":"10.57187/4645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Optimising cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) management is crucial for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival but requires a clear understanding of the entire chain of survival. However, detailed OHCA management data from Swiss emergency centres (EC) are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted among Level 1 and 2 ECs affiliated with the Swiss Society of Emergency and Rescue Medicine (SGNOR). The questionnaire covered key aspects of CPR management, including EC characteristics, team composition, resuscitation protocols and challenges pertaining to the year 2022. Analyses were performed using descriptive methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rates were 94% (15/16) from Level 1 and 28% (10/36) from Level 2 ECs. CPR training is widely implemented with 90% of centres conducting emergency bay simulations. ACLS certification is mandated in 73% of Level 1 but only 20% of Level 2 centres. Team composition and debriefing practices vary with a structured debriefing absent in 67%/60% of Level 1/2 ECs. Mechanical chest compression devices are used in 80%/30% of ECs, while extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is available in 73%/10% ECs. Standard operating procedures are widely implemented, but 40%/60% of ECs lack structured OHCA databases. Challenges differ by Level, with Level 1 centres reporting variability in expertise due to frequently rotating staff and Level 2 centres highlighting staff shortages especially during night shifts. Decision-making challenges include termination of resuscitation, interdisciplinary coordination and post-resuscitation care. Research engagement is limited to 20% of Level 1 centres, but 93% of Level 1 and 50% of Level 2 ECs report willingness to engage in research projects under specific conditions, such as minimal time commitment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant variability in CPR management, training and data collection exists across Swiss ECs. Standardised protocols, structured training and improved interdisciplinarity coordination are needed. Enhancing data registration and aligning practices with international guidelines could optimise patient outcomes, emphasising the need for further research and national standardisation efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":"156 ","pages":"4645"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/4645","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Optimising cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) management is crucial for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival but requires a clear understanding of the entire chain of survival. However, detailed OHCA management data from Swiss emergency centres (EC) are limited.

Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted among Level 1 and 2 ECs affiliated with the Swiss Society of Emergency and Rescue Medicine (SGNOR). The questionnaire covered key aspects of CPR management, including EC characteristics, team composition, resuscitation protocols and challenges pertaining to the year 2022. Analyses were performed using descriptive methods.

Results: Response rates were 94% (15/16) from Level 1 and 28% (10/36) from Level 2 ECs. CPR training is widely implemented with 90% of centres conducting emergency bay simulations. ACLS certification is mandated in 73% of Level 1 but only 20% of Level 2 centres. Team composition and debriefing practices vary with a structured debriefing absent in 67%/60% of Level 1/2 ECs. Mechanical chest compression devices are used in 80%/30% of ECs, while extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is available in 73%/10% ECs. Standard operating procedures are widely implemented, but 40%/60% of ECs lack structured OHCA databases. Challenges differ by Level, with Level 1 centres reporting variability in expertise due to frequently rotating staff and Level 2 centres highlighting staff shortages especially during night shifts. Decision-making challenges include termination of resuscitation, interdisciplinary coordination and post-resuscitation care. Research engagement is limited to 20% of Level 1 centres, but 93% of Level 1 and 50% of Level 2 ECs report willingness to engage in research projects under specific conditions, such as minimal time commitment.

Conclusion: Significant variability in CPR management, training and data collection exists across Swiss ECs. Standardised protocols, structured training and improved interdisciplinarity coordination are needed. Enhancing data registration and aligning practices with international guidelines could optimise patient outcomes, emphasising the need for further research and national standardisation efforts.

瑞士急救中心非创伤性院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的临床复苏管理:一项调查研究
优化心肺复苏(CPR)管理对院外心脏骤停(OHCA)生存至关重要,但需要对整个生存链有清晰的认识。然而,来自瑞士急救中心(EC)的详细OHCA管理数据有限。方法:对瑞士急救医学学会(SGNOR)附属的1级和2级ECs进行全国性的横断面调查。调查问卷涵盖了心肺复苏管理的关键方面,包括EC特征、团队组成、复苏方案和2022年的挑战。采用描述性方法进行分析。结果:1级ECs有效率为94%(15/16),2级ECs有效率为28%(10/36)。心肺复苏术培训被广泛实施,90%的中心进行急救舱模拟。73%的一级中心要求获得ACLS认证,但只有20%的二级中心要求获得ACLS认证。团队组成和汇报实践各不相同,67%/60%的1/2级ec没有结构化的汇报。80%/30%的ECs采用机械胸外按压装置,73%/10%的ECs采用体外膜氧合。标准操作程序得到广泛实施,但40%/60%的ECs缺乏结构化的OHCA数据库。面临的挑战因级别而异,一级中心报告说,由于工作人员经常轮岗,专业知识存在差异,二级中心则强调人员短缺,尤其是夜班工作人员短缺。决策挑战包括复苏终止、跨学科协调和复苏后护理。研究参与仅限于20%的一级中心,但93%的一级中心和50%的二级中心报告愿意在特定条件下参与研究项目,例如最短的时间投入。结论:瑞士各急救中心在心肺复苏管理、培训和数据收集方面存在显著差异。需要标准化的协议、有组织的培训和改进的跨学科协调。加强数据注册和使实践与国际指南保持一致可以优化患者的结果,强调需要进一步的研究和国家标准化努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书