Diagnostic assessment of first-episode psychosis patients and adherence to German S3 guidelines: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Karen J Schulz, Marie C Khorsandian, Claudio Corda, Franziska C Grätz, Andreas B Hofmann, Anne Henriette Hövel, Mario Müller, Philipp Homan, Erich Seifritz, Tobias R Spiller, Achim Burrer
{"title":"Diagnostic assessment of first-episode psychosis patients and adherence to German S3 guidelines: a retrospective cross-sectional study.","authors":"Karen J Schulz, Marie C Khorsandian, Claudio Corda, Franziska C Grätz, Andreas B Hofmann, Anne Henriette Hövel, Mario Müller, Philipp Homan, Erich Seifritz, Tobias R Spiller, Achim Burrer","doi":"10.57187/s.4490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Guidelines for diagnostic work-up in first-episode psychosis (FEP) vary worldwide. The German DGPPN S3 guidelines recommend a comprehensive work-up, including neuroimaging. However, real-world adherence to these recommendations remains unclear. This study examined guideline adherence in a Swiss tertiary psychiatric hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study analysing electronic healthcare records of first-episode psychosis patients hospitalised with an ICD-10 chapter F2 diagnosis for the first time between October 2022 and September 2023. We assessed adherence to recommended mandatory DGPPN S3 assessments - neurological examinations, blood analyses, drug screening, MRI - and evaluated completion of optional assessments such as EEG and lumbar puncture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 68 first-episode psychosis patients were included from 364 patients screened: 44 (64.7%) were men; their median age was 29 (IQR: 23-33) years; 35 (51.5%) were involuntary admissions. Nearly all patients (n = 66 or 97.1%) received thorough neurological examinations and blood analyses, while 56 (82.4%) underwent drug screening (with 35 [44.6%] testing positive for cannabis). MRI was conducted in 38 (55.9%) cases. Non-completion of MRI was mainly due to patient refusal (n = 10 or 14.7%) or early discharge (n = 16 or 23.5%). Optional EEG and lumbar puncture were less frequently performed: in 26 (38.2%) and 4 (5.9%) patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, guideline adherence was high, particularly for essential diagnostic procedures. However, only around half of the sample underwent MRI imaging, largely because of patient refusal or patient-requested discharge prior to completion of the suggested assessment. These findings highlight the need for optimised diagnostic workflows and enhanced patient education strategies to improve guideline adherence in FEP assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":"156 ","pages":"4490"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/s.4490","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for diagnostic work-up in first-episode psychosis (FEP) vary worldwide. The German DGPPN S3 guidelines recommend a comprehensive work-up, including neuroimaging. However, real-world adherence to these recommendations remains unclear. This study examined guideline adherence in a Swiss tertiary psychiatric hospital.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study analysing electronic healthcare records of first-episode psychosis patients hospitalised with an ICD-10 chapter F2 diagnosis for the first time between October 2022 and September 2023. We assessed adherence to recommended mandatory DGPPN S3 assessments - neurological examinations, blood analyses, drug screening, MRI - and evaluated completion of optional assessments such as EEG and lumbar puncture.

Results: A total of 68 first-episode psychosis patients were included from 364 patients screened: 44 (64.7%) were men; their median age was 29 (IQR: 23-33) years; 35 (51.5%) were involuntary admissions. Nearly all patients (n = 66 or 97.1%) received thorough neurological examinations and blood analyses, while 56 (82.4%) underwent drug screening (with 35 [44.6%] testing positive for cannabis). MRI was conducted in 38 (55.9%) cases. Non-completion of MRI was mainly due to patient refusal (n = 10 or 14.7%) or early discharge (n = 16 or 23.5%). Optional EEG and lumbar puncture were less frequently performed: in 26 (38.2%) and 4 (5.9%) patients, respectively.

Conclusions: Overall, guideline adherence was high, particularly for essential diagnostic procedures. However, only around half of the sample underwent MRI imaging, largely because of patient refusal or patient-requested discharge prior to completion of the suggested assessment. These findings highlight the need for optimised diagnostic workflows and enhanced patient education strategies to improve guideline adherence in FEP assessment.

首发精神病患者的诊断评估和遵守德国S3指南:一项回顾性横断面研究。
背景:首发精神病(FEP)的诊断检查指南在世界范围内各不相同。德国DGPPN S3指南建议进行全面检查,包括神经影像学检查。然而,现实世界对这些建议的遵守程度仍不清楚。本研究调查了瑞士一家三级精神病院的指南依从性。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性横断面研究,分析了2022年10月至2023年9月期间首次以ICD-10第F2章诊断住院的首发精神病患者的电子医疗记录。我们评估了推荐的强制性DGPPN S3评估(神经学检查、血液分析、药物筛选、MRI)的依从性,并评估了脑电图和腰椎穿刺等可选评估的完成情况。结果:从筛选的364例患者中共纳入68例首发精神病患者:男性44例(64.7%);年龄中位数为29岁(IQR: 23-33);非自愿入院35例(51.5%)。几乎所有患者(n = 66或97.1%)都接受了彻底的神经学检查和血液分析,56例(82.4%)接受了药物筛查(35例(44.6%)大麻检测呈阳性)。38例(55.9%)行MRI检查。未完成MRI检查主要是由于患者拒绝(n = 10或14.7%)或提前出院(n = 16或23.5%)。选择性脑电图和腰椎穿刺较少,分别为26例(38.2%)和4例(5.9%)。结论:总体而言,指南的依从性很高,特别是对于必要的诊断程序。然而,只有大约一半的样本接受了MRI成像,主要是因为患者拒绝或患者要求在完成建议的评估之前出院。这些发现强调需要优化诊断工作流程和加强患者教育策略,以提高FEP评估的指南依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书