A qualitative assessment of the use of artificial intelligence in public sector health organisations in Ontario, Canada.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Swiss medical weekly Pub Date : 2026-02-20 DOI:10.57187/4942
Steven Habbous, Jeremy Herring, Tina Badiani, Adalsteinn Brown, Michael Hillmer, Laura C Rosella
{"title":"A qualitative assessment of the use of artificial intelligence in public sector health organisations in Ontario, Canada.","authors":"Steven Habbous, Jeremy Herring, Tina Badiani, Adalsteinn Brown, Michael Hillmer, Laura C Rosella","doi":"10.57187/4942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) capabilities and increased access to methods have enabled population-level analysis for research and health system monitoring. However, governments and public authorities may not be aware of the full range of applications, opportunities, and barriers and challenges. The purpose of the present study was to understand the barriers and facilitators of AI/ML and whether (and how) AI/ML was being used (or could be used) in public sector health organisations in a publicly funded health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen key informant interviews at three public sector health organisations were conducted. Common themes were identified. An in-person workshop was held in Toronto on 15 May 2024. We identified barriers and enablers and make recommendations for advancing AI/ML in the broader public sector.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of six barriers were identified by participants: 1) knowledge, education and expertise; 2) privacy, ethics and security; 3) technology and infrastructure; 4) financial barriers; 5) competing priorities; and 6) fear of being replaced. Key enablers include 1) partnerships; 2) buy-in and support from senior leadership; 3) management and operational supports; and 4) actionable use cases. One prominent use case objective was to enhance healthcare system efficiency, including automating routine or unskilled operations to allow healthcare professionals to focus on higher-value tasks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Demonstrating success from focused small-scale AI applications, partnering with academia, and engaging senior leadership may build confidence and capability, but it is important to share knowledge, experiences, and measure success for the perspectives of different partners.</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":"156 ","pages":"4942"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/4942","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) capabilities and increased access to methods have enabled population-level analysis for research and health system monitoring. However, governments and public authorities may not be aware of the full range of applications, opportunities, and barriers and challenges. The purpose of the present study was to understand the barriers and facilitators of AI/ML and whether (and how) AI/ML was being used (or could be used) in public sector health organisations in a publicly funded health system.

Methods: Thirteen key informant interviews at three public sector health organisations were conducted. Common themes were identified. An in-person workshop was held in Toronto on 15 May 2024. We identified barriers and enablers and make recommendations for advancing AI/ML in the broader public sector.

Results: A total of six barriers were identified by participants: 1) knowledge, education and expertise; 2) privacy, ethics and security; 3) technology and infrastructure; 4) financial barriers; 5) competing priorities; and 6) fear of being replaced. Key enablers include 1) partnerships; 2) buy-in and support from senior leadership; 3) management and operational supports; and 4) actionable use cases. One prominent use case objective was to enhance healthcare system efficiency, including automating routine or unskilled operations to allow healthcare professionals to focus on higher-value tasks.

Conclusion: Demonstrating success from focused small-scale AI applications, partnering with academia, and engaging senior leadership may build confidence and capability, but it is important to share knowledge, experiences, and measure success for the perspectives of different partners.

对加拿大安大略省公共部门卫生组织使用人工智能的定性评估。
背景:人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)能力的进步以及方法可及性的增加使研究和卫生系统监测的人口水平分析成为可能。然而,政府和公共当局可能没有意识到所有的应用、机遇、障碍和挑战。本研究的目的是了解人工智能/机器学习的障碍和促进因素,以及人工智能/机器学习是否(以及如何)在公共资助的卫生系统中的公共部门卫生组织中被使用(或可以使用)。方法:在三个公共部门卫生组织进行了13个关键信息者访谈。确定了共同的主题。2024年5月15日在多伦多举行了一次面对面的研讨会。我们确定了障碍和推动因素,并提出了在更广泛的公共部门推进AI/ML的建议。结果:参与者共识别出6个障碍:1)知识、教育和专业技能;2)隐私、道德和安全;3)技术和基础设施;4)资金壁垒;5)优先竞争;6)害怕被取代。关键的促成因素包括:1)伙伴关系;2)高层领导的认同和支持;3)管理和运营支持;4)可操作的用例。一个突出的用例目标是提高医疗保健系统的效率,包括自动化常规或非熟练操作,使医疗保健专业人员能够专注于更高价值的任务。结论:展示小规模人工智能应用的成功,与学术界合作,吸引高层领导可能会建立信心和能力,但重要的是分享知识、经验,并从不同合作伙伴的角度衡量成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书