Development and biomechanical validation of a 3D-printed Schepens scleral depressor.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Luís Expedito Sabage, Mariana Pasqualin Wojcikiewicz, Thiago Meister, João Pedro Vieira Neto Murta, Gustavo Túlio Manfredini, Jair Marcelo Saad Ortega, Josmar Sabage, Carlos Augusto Moreira-Neto, Alessandra Mazzo
{"title":"Development and biomechanical validation of a 3D-printed Schepens scleral depressor.","authors":"Luís Expedito Sabage, Mariana Pasqualin Wojcikiewicz, Thiago Meister, João Pedro Vieira Neto Murta, Gustavo Túlio Manfredini, Jair Marcelo Saad Ortega, Josmar Sabage, Carlos Augusto Moreira-Neto, Alessandra Mazzo","doi":"10.1177/09544119261441042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to develop a low-cost 3D-printed scleral depressor and evaluate its mechanical performance, safety margins, and ocular biomechanical effects. A Schepens-style depressor was developed and printed in PLA. Examiners performed two different tests: (1) the maximum simulated scleral depression force, using both the 3D-printed and conventional steel depressors, and (2) a breakage test performed only on the 3D-printed device, determining its mechanical failure threshold for probabilistic safety analysis. Peak forces were applied to the porcine belly and recorded by a precision balance with slow-motion video analysis. A third test, which was conducted exclusively with the 3D-printed depressor, was performed using one ex vivo porcine eye model to correlate the applied force with the induced intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation. The pressure-volume behavior was modeled via the Friedenwald rigidity coefficient. One unit of the depressor prototype consumed 3.06 g of PLA, with an estimated cost and print time of U$ 0.06 and 22 min, respectively. The simulated indentations produced forces of 21.21 ± 6.23 N (3D-printed depressor) and 25.02 ± 4.64 N (steel depressor), with no significant difference between devices. The 3D-printed instrument breakage point was 63.27 ± 10.72 N, with a 2.98 factor of safety (FS) and 3.39 reliability index (β). In the porcine model, scleral depression produced a 15.63 ± 8.13 mmHg increase in IOP, requiring 0.191 ± 0.09 N (FS = 331.2 and β = 5.88). The 3D-printed depressor demonstrates effective mechanical robustness, wide safety margins, and functional equivalence to steel instruments, supporting the use of customizable, low-cost 3D-printed depressors in training and clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20666,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"545-554"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119261441042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a low-cost 3D-printed scleral depressor and evaluate its mechanical performance, safety margins, and ocular biomechanical effects. A Schepens-style depressor was developed and printed in PLA. Examiners performed two different tests: (1) the maximum simulated scleral depression force, using both the 3D-printed and conventional steel depressors, and (2) a breakage test performed only on the 3D-printed device, determining its mechanical failure threshold for probabilistic safety analysis. Peak forces were applied to the porcine belly and recorded by a precision balance with slow-motion video analysis. A third test, which was conducted exclusively with the 3D-printed depressor, was performed using one ex vivo porcine eye model to correlate the applied force with the induced intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation. The pressure-volume behavior was modeled via the Friedenwald rigidity coefficient. One unit of the depressor prototype consumed 3.06 g of PLA, with an estimated cost and print time of U$ 0.06 and 22 min, respectively. The simulated indentations produced forces of 21.21 ± 6.23 N (3D-printed depressor) and 25.02 ± 4.64 N (steel depressor), with no significant difference between devices. The 3D-printed instrument breakage point was 63.27 ± 10.72 N, with a 2.98 factor of safety (FS) and 3.39 reliability index (β). In the porcine model, scleral depression produced a 15.63 ± 8.13 mmHg increase in IOP, requiring 0.191 ± 0.09 N (FS = 331.2 and β = 5.88). The 3D-printed depressor demonstrates effective mechanical robustness, wide safety margins, and functional equivalence to steel instruments, supporting the use of customizable, low-cost 3D-printed depressors in training and clinical settings.

3d打印Schepens巩膜抑制剂的开发和生物力学验证。
本研究旨在开发一种低成本的3d打印巩膜抑制剂,并评估其机械性能、安全边际和眼部生物力学效应。研制并打印了一种schepens型降压机。检查人员进行了两项不同的测试:(1)使用3d打印和传统钢制降压器模拟最大巩膜降压力,(2)仅在3d打印设备上进行断裂测试,确定其机械故障阈值,用于概率安全分析。将峰值力施加到猪腹部,并通过精确平衡和慢动作视频分析记录下来。第三个测试是专门使用3d打印的降压药进行的,使用一个离体猪眼模型进行,以将施加力与诱导的眼内压(IOP)升高联系起来。通过弗里登瓦尔德刚度系数模拟了压力-体积特性。一个单元的减压器原型消耗了3.06 g PLA,估计成本和打印时间分别为0.06美元和22分钟。模拟压痕产生的力为21.21±6.23 N (3d打印压痕器)和25.02±4.64 N(钢制压痕器),两种装置之间无显著差异。3d打印仪器的断裂点为63.27±10.72 N,安全系数(FS)为2.98,可靠性指数(β)为3.39。在猪模型中,巩膜凹陷使IOP升高15.63±8.13 mmHg,需要0.191±0.09 N (FS = 331.2, β = 5.88)。3d打印的降压器具有有效的机械稳健性、较大的安全边际和与钢制降压器等效的功能,支持在培训和临床环境中使用可定制的低成本3d打印降压器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
122
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering in Medicine is an interdisciplinary journal encompassing all aspects of engineering in medicine. The Journal is a vital tool for maintaining an understanding of the newest techniques and research in medical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书