Luís Expedito Sabage, Mariana Pasqualin Wojcikiewicz, Thiago Meister, João Pedro Vieira Neto Murta, Gustavo Túlio Manfredini, Jair Marcelo Saad Ortega, Josmar Sabage, Carlos Augusto Moreira-Neto, Alessandra Mazzo
{"title":"Development and biomechanical validation of a 3D-printed Schepens scleral depressor.","authors":"Luís Expedito Sabage, Mariana Pasqualin Wojcikiewicz, Thiago Meister, João Pedro Vieira Neto Murta, Gustavo Túlio Manfredini, Jair Marcelo Saad Ortega, Josmar Sabage, Carlos Augusto Moreira-Neto, Alessandra Mazzo","doi":"10.1177/09544119261441042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to develop a low-cost 3D-printed scleral depressor and evaluate its mechanical performance, safety margins, and ocular biomechanical effects. A Schepens-style depressor was developed and printed in PLA. Examiners performed two different tests: (1) the maximum simulated scleral depression force, using both the 3D-printed and conventional steel depressors, and (2) a breakage test performed only on the 3D-printed device, determining its mechanical failure threshold for probabilistic safety analysis. Peak forces were applied to the porcine belly and recorded by a precision balance with slow-motion video analysis. A third test, which was conducted exclusively with the 3D-printed depressor, was performed using one ex vivo porcine eye model to correlate the applied force with the induced intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation. The pressure-volume behavior was modeled via the Friedenwald rigidity coefficient. One unit of the depressor prototype consumed 3.06 g of PLA, with an estimated cost and print time of U$ 0.06 and 22 min, respectively. The simulated indentations produced forces of 21.21 ± 6.23 N (3D-printed depressor) and 25.02 ± 4.64 N (steel depressor), with no significant difference between devices. The 3D-printed instrument breakage point was 63.27 ± 10.72 N, with a 2.98 factor of safety (FS) and 3.39 reliability index (β). In the porcine model, scleral depression produced a 15.63 ± 8.13 mmHg increase in IOP, requiring 0.191 ± 0.09 N (FS = 331.2 and β = 5.88). The 3D-printed depressor demonstrates effective mechanical robustness, wide safety margins, and functional equivalence to steel instruments, supporting the use of customizable, low-cost 3D-printed depressors in training and clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20666,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"545-554"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119261441042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a low-cost 3D-printed scleral depressor and evaluate its mechanical performance, safety margins, and ocular biomechanical effects. A Schepens-style depressor was developed and printed in PLA. Examiners performed two different tests: (1) the maximum simulated scleral depression force, using both the 3D-printed and conventional steel depressors, and (2) a breakage test performed only on the 3D-printed device, determining its mechanical failure threshold for probabilistic safety analysis. Peak forces were applied to the porcine belly and recorded by a precision balance with slow-motion video analysis. A third test, which was conducted exclusively with the 3D-printed depressor, was performed using one ex vivo porcine eye model to correlate the applied force with the induced intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation. The pressure-volume behavior was modeled via the Friedenwald rigidity coefficient. One unit of the depressor prototype consumed 3.06 g of PLA, with an estimated cost and print time of U$ 0.06 and 22 min, respectively. The simulated indentations produced forces of 21.21 ± 6.23 N (3D-printed depressor) and 25.02 ± 4.64 N (steel depressor), with no significant difference between devices. The 3D-printed instrument breakage point was 63.27 ± 10.72 N, with a 2.98 factor of safety (FS) and 3.39 reliability index (β). In the porcine model, scleral depression produced a 15.63 ± 8.13 mmHg increase in IOP, requiring 0.191 ± 0.09 N (FS = 331.2 and β = 5.88). The 3D-printed depressor demonstrates effective mechanical robustness, wide safety margins, and functional equivalence to steel instruments, supporting the use of customizable, low-cost 3D-printed depressors in training and clinical settings.
本研究旨在开发一种低成本的3d打印巩膜抑制剂,并评估其机械性能、安全边际和眼部生物力学效应。研制并打印了一种schepens型降压机。检查人员进行了两项不同的测试:(1)使用3d打印和传统钢制降压器模拟最大巩膜降压力,(2)仅在3d打印设备上进行断裂测试,确定其机械故障阈值,用于概率安全分析。将峰值力施加到猪腹部,并通过精确平衡和慢动作视频分析记录下来。第三个测试是专门使用3d打印的降压药进行的,使用一个离体猪眼模型进行,以将施加力与诱导的眼内压(IOP)升高联系起来。通过弗里登瓦尔德刚度系数模拟了压力-体积特性。一个单元的减压器原型消耗了3.06 g PLA,估计成本和打印时间分别为0.06美元和22分钟。模拟压痕产生的力为21.21±6.23 N (3d打印压痕器)和25.02±4.64 N(钢制压痕器),两种装置之间无显著差异。3d打印仪器的断裂点为63.27±10.72 N,安全系数(FS)为2.98,可靠性指数(β)为3.39。在猪模型中,巩膜凹陷使IOP升高15.63±8.13 mmHg,需要0.191±0.09 N (FS = 331.2, β = 5.88)。3d打印的降压器具有有效的机械稳健性、较大的安全边际和与钢制降压器等效的功能,支持在培训和临床环境中使用可定制的低成本3d打印降压器。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Engineering in Medicine is an interdisciplinary journal encompassing all aspects of engineering in medicine. The Journal is a vital tool for maintaining an understanding of the newest techniques and research in medical engineering.