Pain-Related Smoking Expectancies Across Tobacco Product Use Patterns, Including Heated Tobacco Products: Psychometric Validation of the Japanese Pain and Smoking Inventory.

IF 1.9 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Keiko Yamada, Takashi Kimura, Naoki Mizunuma, Takahiro Tabuchi
{"title":"Pain-Related Smoking Expectancies Across Tobacco Product Use Patterns, Including Heated Tobacco Products: Psychometric Validation of the Japanese Pain and Smoking Inventory.","authors":"Keiko Yamada, Takashi Kimura, Naoki Mizunuma, Takahiro Tabuchi","doi":"10.1002/npr2.70119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>With the rapid proliferation of heated tobacco products (HTPs) in Japan, understanding pain-related smoking expectancies across tobacco use patterns has become increasingly important. In this study, we aimed to profile these expectancies among adults with pain using the Pain and Smoking Inventory (PSI) and to evaluate its psychometric properties in a Japanese context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional internet-based survey in 2024 among 300 Japanese adults with pain who smoked daily. Participants were categorized as combustible-only, HTP-only, switchers (from cigarettes to HTPs), or dual users. Psychometric evaluation included assessment of factor structure, internal consistency, and convergent validity. We used a structural equation model to examine associations between the latent PSI score and pain-related outcomes. We then conducted analyses of covariance to compare PSI scores across tobacco use groups (adjusted for age and gender).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Psychometric validation indicated high internal consistency (α = 0.93), mixed but essentially unidimensional fit, and expected correlations with nicotine dependence, pain, and psychological measures. The structural equation model demonstrated significant positive associations between the latent PSI factor and pain intensity (β = 0.29, p < 0.001) as well as pain-related disability (β = 0.39, p < 0.001). Exploratory group comparisons revealed higher PSI scores among dual users than switchers, reflecting stronger perceived pain-smoking relationships. HTP-only users also showed descriptively elevated profiles similar to combustible and dual users.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pain-related smoking expectancies differed across tobacco product use patterns, with dual users showing higher-risk expectancy profiles. The PSI may serve as a useful tool for screening and tailored intervention in pain and tobacco use contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19137,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychopharmacology Reports","volume":"46 2","pages":"e70119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13068504/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychopharmacology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/npr2.70119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: With the rapid proliferation of heated tobacco products (HTPs) in Japan, understanding pain-related smoking expectancies across tobacco use patterns has become increasingly important. In this study, we aimed to profile these expectancies among adults with pain using the Pain and Smoking Inventory (PSI) and to evaluate its psychometric properties in a Japanese context.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional internet-based survey in 2024 among 300 Japanese adults with pain who smoked daily. Participants were categorized as combustible-only, HTP-only, switchers (from cigarettes to HTPs), or dual users. Psychometric evaluation included assessment of factor structure, internal consistency, and convergent validity. We used a structural equation model to examine associations between the latent PSI score and pain-related outcomes. We then conducted analyses of covariance to compare PSI scores across tobacco use groups (adjusted for age and gender).

Results: Psychometric validation indicated high internal consistency (α = 0.93), mixed but essentially unidimensional fit, and expected correlations with nicotine dependence, pain, and psychological measures. The structural equation model demonstrated significant positive associations between the latent PSI factor and pain intensity (β = 0.29, p < 0.001) as well as pain-related disability (β = 0.39, p < 0.001). Exploratory group comparisons revealed higher PSI scores among dual users than switchers, reflecting stronger perceived pain-smoking relationships. HTP-only users also showed descriptively elevated profiles similar to combustible and dual users.

Conclusions: Pain-related smoking expectancies differed across tobacco product use patterns, with dual users showing higher-risk expectancy profiles. The PSI may serve as a useful tool for screening and tailored intervention in pain and tobacco use contexts.

烟草产品使用模式(包括加热烟草产品)中与疼痛相关的吸烟预期:日本疼痛和吸烟量表的心理测量验证。
目的:随着加热烟草制品(htp)在日本的迅速普及,了解烟草使用模式中与疼痛相关的吸烟预期变得越来越重要。在这项研究中,我们的目的是利用疼痛和吸烟量表(PSI)来描述疼痛成人的这些期望,并评估其在日本背景下的心理测量特性。方法:我们在2024年对300名每天吸烟的日本疼痛成年人进行了一项基于互联网的横断面调查。参与者被分类为只使用可燃物、只使用http、转换者(从香烟到https)或双重使用者。心理测量评估包括因素结构、内部一致性和收敛效度的评估。我们使用结构方程模型来检验潜在PSI评分与疼痛相关结果之间的关系。然后,我们进行协方差分析,比较不同烟草使用组的PSI得分(根据年龄和性别进行调整)。结果:心理测量验证显示高内部一致性(α = 0.93),混合但基本上是一维拟合,并与尼古丁依赖,疼痛和心理测量预期相关。结构方程模型显示,潜在PSI因子与疼痛强度之间存在显著正相关(β = 0.29, p)。结论:不同烟草产品使用模式下,疼痛相关吸烟预期存在差异,双重使用者表现出更高的风险预期特征。PSI可以作为一种有用的工具,在疼痛和烟草使用情况下进行筛查和量身定制的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书