Correlation of retinal imaging with presence of inner limiting membrane pores in idiopathic epiretinal gliosis.

IF 3.8 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Denise Vogt, Nikolina Durdevic, Azza Dammak, Ricarda G Schumann, Andrea Govetto, Mario R Romano, Efstathios Vounotrypidis, Melih Parlak, Armin Wolf
{"title":"Correlation of retinal imaging with presence of inner limiting membrane pores in idiopathic epiretinal gliosis.","authors":"Denise Vogt, Nikolina Durdevic, Azza Dammak, Ricarda G Schumann, Andrea Govetto, Mario R Romano, Efstathios Vounotrypidis, Melih Parlak, Armin Wolf","doi":"10.1186/s40942-026-00849-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: To correlate retinal imaging biomarkers in idiopathic epiretinal membranes (iERM) with histopathological findings of internal limiting membrane (ILM) pores. METHODS: We retrospectively included 18 eyes of 18 patients diagnosed with iERM that underwent vitrectomy with membrane peeling between October 2023 and June 2024 at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany. The surgically excised tissue was processed as flat mounts for immunocytochemistry. Clinical data and retinal architecture, as assessed by multimodal imaging including optical coherence tomography (OCT), enface OCT, fundus autofluorescence and multicolor imaging, were reviewed pre-and postoperatively. RESULTS: In our study, ILM pores were identified by immunocytochemistry in 15 of 18 specimens (83%). OCT showed ERM stage 2 in 11 eyes (61%), stage 3 in 6 eyes (33%) and stage 4 in 1 eye (6%), with central bouquet abnormalities in 6 of 18 eyes (33%) and ectopic inner foveal layers in 7 of 18 eyes (39%) of eyes. Postoperatively at 12 months, microcystic macular edema (MME) persisted in 3 of 18 eyes (17%) and resolved in one eye. Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer (DONFL) was observed in 15 of 18 eyes (83%). There was no significant correlation between ILM pores and iERM stage, the presence of ellipsoid zone defects, MME or DONFL (Fisher’s exact test: each p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In iERM, ILM pores are highly frequently seen, but appear to be independent of ERM severity and retinal biomarkers. The presence of ILM pores was not found to be associated with anatomical alterations following ILM removal. </p>","PeriodicalId":14289,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13081236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-026-00849-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To correlate retinal imaging biomarkers in idiopathic epiretinal membranes (iERM) with histopathological findings of internal limiting membrane (ILM) pores. METHODS: We retrospectively included 18 eyes of 18 patients diagnosed with iERM that underwent vitrectomy with membrane peeling between October 2023 and June 2024 at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany. The surgically excised tissue was processed as flat mounts for immunocytochemistry. Clinical data and retinal architecture, as assessed by multimodal imaging including optical coherence tomography (OCT), enface OCT, fundus autofluorescence and multicolor imaging, were reviewed pre-and postoperatively. RESULTS: In our study, ILM pores were identified by immunocytochemistry in 15 of 18 specimens (83%). OCT showed ERM stage 2 in 11 eyes (61%), stage 3 in 6 eyes (33%) and stage 4 in 1 eye (6%), with central bouquet abnormalities in 6 of 18 eyes (33%) and ectopic inner foveal layers in 7 of 18 eyes (39%) of eyes. Postoperatively at 12 months, microcystic macular edema (MME) persisted in 3 of 18 eyes (17%) and resolved in one eye. Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer (DONFL) was observed in 15 of 18 eyes (83%). There was no significant correlation between ILM pores and iERM stage, the presence of ellipsoid zone defects, MME or DONFL (Fisher’s exact test: each p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In iERM, ILM pores are highly frequently seen, but appear to be independent of ERM severity and retinal biomarkers. The presence of ILM pores was not found to be associated with anatomical alterations following ILM removal.

特发性视网膜前胶质瘤视网膜成像与内限制性膜孔的相关性。
背景:将特发性视网膜前膜(iERM)中的视网膜成像生物标志物与内限制膜(ILM)孔的组织病理学结果联系起来。方法:我们回顾性纳入德国乌尔姆大学医院眼科于2023年10月至2024年6月期间接受玻璃体切除术并剥离的18例iERM患者的18只眼睛。手术切除的组织处理为免疫细胞化学平载。通过多模态成像(包括光学相干断层扫描(OCT)、表面OCT、眼底自身荧光和多色成像)评估的临床资料和视网膜结构,对术前和术后进行了回顾。结果:在我们的研究中,18个标本中有15个(83%)通过免疫细胞化学鉴定出ILM孔。OCT显示ERM 2期11只眼(61%),3期6只眼(33%),4期1只眼(6%),18只眼中有6只眼(33%)中心束异常,18只眼中有7只眼(39%)内中央凹层异位。术后12个月,18只眼中有3只(17%)存在微囊性黄斑水肿(MME), 1只眼消退。18只眼中有15只(83%)出现视神经纤维层游离。ILM孔与iERM分期、是否存在椭球带缺陷、MME或DONFL无显著相关性(Fisher精确检验:p < 0.05)。结论:在iERM中,ILM孔非常常见,但似乎与ERM严重程度和视网膜生物标志物无关。ILM孔的存在没有发现与ILM去除后的解剖改变有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Retina and Vitreous focuses on the ophthalmic subspecialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The journal presents original articles on new approaches to diagnosis, outcomes of clinical trials, innovations in pharmacological therapy and surgical techniques, as well as basic science advances that impact clinical practice. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: -Imaging of the retina, choroid and vitreous -Innovations in optical coherence tomography (OCT) -Small-gauge vitrectomy, retinal detachment, chromovitrectomy -Electroretinography (ERG), microperimetry, other functional tests -Intraocular tumors -Retinal pharmacotherapy & drug delivery -Diabetic retinopathy & other vascular diseases -Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) & other macular entities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书