Evaluation of the contribution of repeat Total Body Photography (TBP) for the early diagnosis of melanoma.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Dermatology Pub Date : 2026-04-10 DOI:10.1159/000551974
Amjad Zoabi, Itay Shavit, Tomer Mimouni, Hana Feuerman, Ofer Reiter
{"title":"Evaluation of the contribution of repeat Total Body Photography (TBP) for the early diagnosis of melanoma.","authors":"Amjad Zoabi, Itay Shavit, Tomer Mimouni, Hana Feuerman, Ofer Reiter","doi":"10.1159/000551974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early detection of cutaneous melanoma is crucial, as prognosis is strongly determined by Breslow thickness. Total-body photography (TBP) is increasingly used in high-risk populations, yet optimal surveillance strategies remain undefined. In our study, we aimed to evaluate how different follow-up approaches, including those incorporating TBP at varying frequencies, influence the early diagnosis of melanoma, as measured by Breslow thickness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included adult patients diagnosed with primary cutaneous melanoma at Rabin Medical Center between 2020 and 2025. Melanomas were classified into four groups according to the clinical setting at diagnosis: non-high-risk clinics; first visit to a high-risk clinic before TBP; high-risk follow-up with prior TBP only; and high-risk follow-up with both prior and repeat TBP on the day of diagnosis. Demographic, clinical, and histopathologic data were extracted. Differences in Breslow thickness were analyzed using analysis of covariance, and invasive versus in situ melanoma rates were assessed using multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 282 melanomas from 249 patients were analyzed. Melanomas diagnosed in non-high-risk clinics were significantly thicker than those diagnosed in high-risk clinics (adjusted mean Breslow difference: 0.78 mm). Surveillance strategy was associated with invasiveness: invasive melanoma rates were highest in non-high-risk clinics (52%), followed by first-visit to high-risk clinic (39%), patients with prior TBP only (34%), and lowest in patients diagnosed during repeat TBP (20%; overall model p = 0.03). Overall Breslow thickness did not differ significantly between melanomas diagnosed during visits with prior TBP alone and those diagnosed during repeat TBP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-risk melanoma clinics incorporating TBP are associated with earlier melanoma detection and lower rates of invasive disease. Repeated TBP was associated with lower rate of invasive melanoma compared with baseline TBP and manual comparison on the day of diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11185,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000551974","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Early detection of cutaneous melanoma is crucial, as prognosis is strongly determined by Breslow thickness. Total-body photography (TBP) is increasingly used in high-risk populations, yet optimal surveillance strategies remain undefined. In our study, we aimed to evaluate how different follow-up approaches, including those incorporating TBP at varying frequencies, influence the early diagnosis of melanoma, as measured by Breslow thickness.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients diagnosed with primary cutaneous melanoma at Rabin Medical Center between 2020 and 2025. Melanomas were classified into four groups according to the clinical setting at diagnosis: non-high-risk clinics; first visit to a high-risk clinic before TBP; high-risk follow-up with prior TBP only; and high-risk follow-up with both prior and repeat TBP on the day of diagnosis. Demographic, clinical, and histopathologic data were extracted. Differences in Breslow thickness were analyzed using analysis of covariance, and invasive versus in situ melanoma rates were assessed using multivariable logistic regression.

Results: A total of 282 melanomas from 249 patients were analyzed. Melanomas diagnosed in non-high-risk clinics were significantly thicker than those diagnosed in high-risk clinics (adjusted mean Breslow difference: 0.78 mm). Surveillance strategy was associated with invasiveness: invasive melanoma rates were highest in non-high-risk clinics (52%), followed by first-visit to high-risk clinic (39%), patients with prior TBP only (34%), and lowest in patients diagnosed during repeat TBP (20%; overall model p = 0.03). Overall Breslow thickness did not differ significantly between melanomas diagnosed during visits with prior TBP alone and those diagnosed during repeat TBP.

Conclusion: High-risk melanoma clinics incorporating TBP are associated with earlier melanoma detection and lower rates of invasive disease. Repeated TBP was associated with lower rate of invasive melanoma compared with baseline TBP and manual comparison on the day of diagnosis.

评价重复全身摄影(TBP)对黑色素瘤早期诊断的贡献。
早期发现皮肤黑色素瘤是至关重要的,因为预后很大程度上取决于布雷斯洛厚度。全身摄影(TBP)越来越多地用于高危人群,但最佳监测策略仍不明确。在我们的研究中,我们旨在评估不同的随访方法,包括合并不同频率TBP的方法,如何影响黑色素瘤的早期诊断,以Breslow厚度测量。方法:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了Rabin医疗中心在2020年至2025年间诊断为原发性皮肤黑色素瘤的成年患者。根据诊断时的临床环境将黑色素瘤分为四组:非高危临床;TBP发生前首次到高危诊所就诊;仅有TBP病史的高危随访;以及诊断当日有既往和重复TBP的高危随访。提取了人口统计学、临床和组织病理学数据。采用协方差分析分析brreslow厚度的差异,采用多变量logistic回归评估浸润性黑色素瘤与原位黑色素瘤的发病率。结果:共分析249例患者282例黑色素瘤。非高危诊所诊断的黑素瘤明显比高危诊所诊断的黑素瘤厚(调整后平均Breslow差:0.78 mm)。监测策略与侵袭性相关:侵袭性黑色素瘤发病率在非高风险诊所最高(52%),其次是首次就诊高风险诊所(39%),仅有TBP病史的患者(34%),在重复TBP诊断的患者中最低(20%;总体模型p = 0.03)。总的Breslow厚度在单独有TBP的患者和复发性TBP的患者之间没有显著差异。结论:高危黑素瘤门诊合并TBP与早期发现黑素瘤和较低的侵袭性疾病发生率相关。与基线TBP和诊断当天的手工比较相比,重复TBP与侵袭性黑色素瘤的发生率较低相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dermatology
Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1893, ''Dermatology'' provides a worldwide survey of clinical and investigative dermatology. Original papers report clinical and laboratory findings. In order to inform readers of the implications of recent research, editorials and reviews prepared by invited, internationally recognized scientists are regularly featured. In addition to original papers, the journal publishes rapid communications, short communications, and letters to ''Dermatology''. ''Dermatology'' answers the complete information needs of practitioners concerned with progress in research related to skin, clinical dermatology and therapy. The journal enjoys a high scientific reputation with a continually increasing impact factor and an equally high circulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书