What is the evidence for virtual wards or hospital-at-home care pathways for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bushra Alenazi, Christopher Hatton, Elizabeth Sapey
{"title":"What is the evidence for virtual wards or hospital-at-home care pathways for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bushra Alenazi, Christopher Hatton, Elizabeth Sapey","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Given increasing interest in admission avoidance, we evaluated the evidence to support virtual wards (VW) and hospital at home (HaH) models of care during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ECOPD).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE (1946 to March 2024), Embase (1974 to March 2024) and CENTRAL (searched 22 March 2024) was conducted. Risk of bias and a random effects meta-analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Adults with an ECOPD presenting to the hospital or who require hospital-led care.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>VW: defined as assessments and interventions delivered remotely or HaH (defined as assessments and interventions delivered by healthcare professionals in patient's homes) care pathways, compared with hospital admission.</p><p><strong>Primary and secondary objectives: </strong>Safety (mortality rate of all causes, in-patient, 7 days and 30 days) and readmission rate in 7 and 30 days. Length of stay in hospital and changes in pulmonary function tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One study assessed VWs (reported in two publications) and 10 assessed HaH. There were no changes in survival or short-term readmission rates attributable to the interventions and no evidence that VW or HaH care pathways reduced the total time a patient spent under hospital-led care, whether at home or in the hospital.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More evidence is needed to support the widespread roll-out of HaH and especially VW pathways for ECOPD. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024517565.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13084816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003611","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Given increasing interest in admission avoidance, we evaluated the evidence to support virtual wards (VW) and hospital at home (HaH) models of care during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ECOPD).
Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE (1946 to March 2024), Embase (1974 to March 2024) and CENTRAL (searched 22 March 2024) was conducted. Risk of bias and a random effects meta-analysis were performed.
Population: Adults with an ECOPD presenting to the hospital or who require hospital-led care.
Interventions: VW: defined as assessments and interventions delivered remotely or HaH (defined as assessments and interventions delivered by healthcare professionals in patient's homes) care pathways, compared with hospital admission.
Primary and secondary objectives: Safety (mortality rate of all causes, in-patient, 7 days and 30 days) and readmission rate in 7 and 30 days. Length of stay in hospital and changes in pulmonary function tests.
Results: One study assessed VWs (reported in two publications) and 10 assessed HaH. There were no changes in survival or short-term readmission rates attributable to the interventions and no evidence that VW or HaH care pathways reduced the total time a patient spent under hospital-led care, whether at home or in the hospital.
Conclusions: More evidence is needed to support the widespread roll-out of HaH and especially VW pathways for ECOPD. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024517565.
期刊介绍：
BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
