Dyadic resistance during parent–adolescent interactions: A state space grid analysis before and after high school

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Family Relations Pub Date : 2026-03-11 Epub Date: 2026-01-10 DOI:10.1111/fare.70137
Daniel Ji, Frances Cabahug, Sheila K. Marshall
{"title":"Dyadic resistance during parent–adolescent interactions: A state space grid analysis before and after high school","authors":"Daniel Ji,&nbsp;Frances Cabahug,&nbsp;Sheila K. Marshall","doi":"10.1111/fare.70137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study examined micro-level resistance dynamics that occur during parent–adolescent interactions before and after the transition to high school.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Although research on parent–adolescent disputes has emphasized global measures of frequency and intensity, less attention has been paid to the actions of resistance during parent–adolescent interactions. This study fills a gap in what is known about parent–adolescent resistance dynamics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A state space grid approach informed by dynamic systems and family conflict theories was conducted on two videorecorded conversations in a sample of 26 Canadian parent–adolescent dyads. Flexibility, attractor, and intergrid distance analyses assessed intradyadic variability in how parents and adolescents resisted one another moment to moment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Attractor analysis revealed that the most probable state during resistance sequences shifted: Before high school it was the Parent Justifying–Adolescent Justifying cell, after it was the Parent Minimizing–Adolescent Rejecting cell. <i>t</i>-test results of intergrid distance scores showed a significant difference in the positioning of resistance sequences after high school.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Results offer evidence that dyadic resistance differs before and after significant family transitions like the move to high school.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Future research on dyadic resistance microprocesses could examine whether the proposed conceptual categories could be applied to dyads across multiple areas of difference to scrutinize its utility for a range of cultural and caregiver relationships.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"75 2","pages":"901-920"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fare.70137","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.70137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study examined micro-level resistance dynamics that occur during parent–adolescent interactions before and after the transition to high school.

Background

Although research on parent–adolescent disputes has emphasized global measures of frequency and intensity, less attention has been paid to the actions of resistance during parent–adolescent interactions. This study fills a gap in what is known about parent–adolescent resistance dynamics.

Methods

A state space grid approach informed by dynamic systems and family conflict theories was conducted on two videorecorded conversations in a sample of 26 Canadian parent–adolescent dyads. Flexibility, attractor, and intergrid distance analyses assessed intradyadic variability in how parents and adolescents resisted one another moment to moment.

Results

Attractor analysis revealed that the most probable state during resistance sequences shifted: Before high school it was the Parent Justifying–Adolescent Justifying cell, after it was the Parent Minimizing–Adolescent Rejecting cell. t-test results of intergrid distance scores showed a significant difference in the positioning of resistance sequences after high school.

Conclusion

Results offer evidence that dyadic resistance differs before and after significant family transitions like the move to high school.

Implications

Future research on dyadic resistance microprocesses could examine whether the proposed conceptual categories could be applied to dyads across multiple areas of difference to scrutinize its utility for a range of cultural and caregiver relationships.

Abstract Image

亲子互动中的二元抗拒:高中前后的状态空间网格分析
目的探讨升入高中前后父母-青少年互动过程中发生的微观阻力动态。虽然对亲子纠纷的研究强调了频率和强度的全球测量,但对亲子互动中抵抗行为的关注较少。这项研究填补了已知的父母-青少年阻力动态方面的空白。方法以动态系统理论和家庭冲突理论为指导,运用状态空间网格方法对26对加拿大父母-青少年的两段对话录像进行分析。灵活性、吸引力和网格间距离分析评估了父母和青少年如何时刻抵抗彼此的径向变异性。结果吸引子分析显示,抵抗序列中最可能的状态发生了变化:高中前为父母辩护-青少年辩护细胞,高中后为父母最小化-青少年排斥细胞。格间距离得分的t检验结果显示,高中后抵抗序列的定位存在显著差异。结论结果表明,在家庭发生重大转变(如升入高中)前后,二元性抵抗是不同的。未来对二元抵抗微过程的研究可以检查所提出的概念类别是否可以应用于跨多个差异领域的二元,以仔细检查其对一系列文化和照顾者关系的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书