Martina Jaskolski, Ayat Nashwan, Amel Azab, Amani Alassaf, Yumna Kassim
{"title":"Integrating Climate Change Into Social Protection Approaches: Developing a Policy Framework for Jordan","authors":"Martina Jaskolski, Ayat Nashwan, Amel Azab, Amani Alassaf, Yumna Kassim","doi":"10.1002/cli2.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Social protection can protect vulnerable groups from climate change but remains inadequately designed to address climate risks. This article presents a framework for climate-sensitive social protection mechanisms proposed by Jordanian experts. Conceptually, it makes an argument for integrating shock-responsive with transformative social protection approaches that consider compound, slow-onset risks. Operationally, it proposes horizontal and vertical governance integration among public, private, and civil society stakeholders, coordination among agricultural, infrastructural, and development sectors, and bridging state social protection with humanitarian assistance systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":100261,"journal":{"name":"Climate Resilience and Sustainability","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cli2.70037","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Resilience and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cli2.70037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Social protection can protect vulnerable groups from climate change but remains inadequately designed to address climate risks. This article presents a framework for climate-sensitive social protection mechanisms proposed by Jordanian experts. Conceptually, it makes an argument for integrating shock-responsive with transformative social protection approaches that consider compound, slow-onset risks. Operationally, it proposes horizontal and vertical governance integration among public, private, and civil society stakeholders, coordination among agricultural, infrastructural, and development sectors, and bridging state social protection with humanitarian assistance systems.