Effects of Three Grassland Intensification Practices on Forage Production and Its Temporal Variability

IF 2.6 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Gonzalo Rama, Mariano Oyarzabal, Gervasio Piñeiro, Micaela Abrigo, Juan Manuel Piñeiro-Guerra, Santiago Baeza
{"title":"Effects of Three Grassland Intensification Practices on Forage Production and Its Temporal Variability","authors":"Gonzalo Rama,&nbsp;Mariano Oyarzabal,&nbsp;Gervasio Piñeiro,&nbsp;Micaela Abrigo,&nbsp;Juan Manuel Piñeiro-Guerra,&nbsp;Santiago Baeza","doi":"10.1111/gfs.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Grassland intensification practices including, overseeding with exotic species and P fertilisation (hereafter ‘overseeding’), the replacement of natural grasslands by sowing perennial pastures (‘perennial pasture’) and the replacement of natural grassland by winter–spring forage crop (‘forage crop’), are widely used to enhance production in livestock systems. Most studies have evaluated the effects of these practices on forage production in ungrazed experimental plots using non-comparable protocols. To our knowledge, few studies have jointly assessed the effect of different intensification practices on forage production and its variability under a standardised protocol across grazed commercial paddocks. We evaluated the effect of these three intensification practices on forage production across 45 commercial farms located in the temperate grasslands of Uruguay. We quantified the mean annual Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), a proxy for forage production and its inter- and intra-annual variability. We compared grazed paired paddocks, consisting of a natural grassland and one of the three intensification practices, and expressed the effect of each practice relative to natural grassland. Mean annual EVI increased by 2% with overseeding, 3% with perennial pasture and 9% with forage crop. Inter-annual variability increased by 6% with overseeding, 19% with perennial pasture and 24% with forage crop. Intra-annual variability increased by 8% with overseeding and 22% with perennial pasture. In summary, forage production increased slightly under all intensification practices and variability increased more markedly. These findings highlight that while forage production can be enhanced by intensification, increased temporal variability may represent a challenge under future scenarios of more frequent extreme climatic events.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.70049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grassland intensification practices including, overseeding with exotic species and P fertilisation (hereafter ‘overseeding’), the replacement of natural grasslands by sowing perennial pastures (‘perennial pasture’) and the replacement of natural grassland by winter–spring forage crop (‘forage crop’), are widely used to enhance production in livestock systems. Most studies have evaluated the effects of these practices on forage production in ungrazed experimental plots using non-comparable protocols. To our knowledge, few studies have jointly assessed the effect of different intensification practices on forage production and its variability under a standardised protocol across grazed commercial paddocks. We evaluated the effect of these three intensification practices on forage production across 45 commercial farms located in the temperate grasslands of Uruguay. We quantified the mean annual Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), a proxy for forage production and its inter- and intra-annual variability. We compared grazed paired paddocks, consisting of a natural grassland and one of the three intensification practices, and expressed the effect of each practice relative to natural grassland. Mean annual EVI increased by 2% with overseeding, 3% with perennial pasture and 9% with forage crop. Inter-annual variability increased by 6% with overseeding, 19% with perennial pasture and 24% with forage crop. Intra-annual variability increased by 8% with overseeding and 22% with perennial pasture. In summary, forage production increased slightly under all intensification practices and variability increased more markedly. These findings highlight that while forage production can be enhanced by intensification, increased temporal variability may represent a challenge under future scenarios of more frequent extreme climatic events.

三种草地集约化措施对牧草生产的影响及其时间变异
草地集约化做法,包括用外来物种过度播种和P肥(以下简称“过度播种”),用多年生牧草(“多年生牧草”)替代天然草地,以及用冬春饲料作物(“饲料作物”)替代天然草地,被广泛用于提高牲畜系统的产量。大多数研究使用非可比方案评估了这些做法对未放牧试验田牧草生产的影响。据我们所知,很少有研究联合评估不同集约化做法对放牧商业围场的饲料生产的影响及其在标准化协议下的可变性。我们评估了这三种集约化做法对乌拉圭温带草原45个商业农场的饲料生产的影响。我们量化了年平均植被增强指数(EVI),这是牧草产量及其年际和年内变化的一个代表。我们比较了由天然草地和三种强化方式中的一种组成的放牧配对围场,并表达了每种强化方式相对于天然草地的效果。年平均EVI增加2%,多年生牧草增加3%,饲料作物增加9%。过度播种使年际变异增加6%,多年生牧草增加19%,饲料作物增加24%。过度播种增加了8%,多年生牧草增加了22%。总之,在所有集约化措施下,牧草产量略有增加,变异性增加更为显著。这些发现强调,虽然集约化可以提高饲料产量,但在未来极端气候事件更频繁的情况下,增加的时间变异可能是一个挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书