Yuxin Zhou , Yixin Zou , Qiuming Shen , Zhuoying Li , Yuting Tan , Honglan Li , Yongbing Xiang
{"title":"A global review and perspective on prostate cancer survival: findings from survival studies of cancer registration data","authors":"Yuxin Zhou , Yixin Zou , Qiuming Shen , Zhuoying Li , Yuting Tan , Honglan Li , Yongbing Xiang","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2026.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To better understand global status, temporal trends, and geographic disparities of prostate cancer survival, we systematically collected published survival studies on prostate cancer from cancer registries worldwide.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SinoMed, CNKI and SEER for survival studies from cancer registries up to April 30, 2025. We synthesized data on observed, relative and net survival since the 1990s, along with age-standardized survival, and further stratified based on age at diagnosis and stage.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall survival was favorable and exhibited a continuous improving trend. In most countries and regions, the 5-year relative survival rate exceeded 70%. However, substantial geographic disparities were observed. The prognosis was better in developed countries in Europe and America than that in less developed countries in Asia and Africa. Since 2000, the age-standardized 5-year relative survival was the highest in the United States at 98.5% (2007–2010), while it was the lowest in Punjab of India at 30.3% (2013–2016). The prognosis was poorest for patients aged ≥ 75, or for those diagnosed with distant or stage IV.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although the survival has been improving over the past three decades, disparities between developed and less developed countries still persist. The extent of the popularization of prostate screening programs, the age or stage at diagnosis, and the sophistication of healthcare systems are likely to be significant contributing factors to these differences. Our results can provide fundamental statistics for formulating and refining relevant policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"6 2","pages":"Pages 175-184"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005426000062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
To better understand global status, temporal trends, and geographic disparities of prostate cancer survival, we systematically collected published survival studies on prostate cancer from cancer registries worldwide.
Methods
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SinoMed, CNKI and SEER for survival studies from cancer registries up to April 30, 2025. We synthesized data on observed, relative and net survival since the 1990s, along with age-standardized survival, and further stratified based on age at diagnosis and stage.
Results
The overall survival was favorable and exhibited a continuous improving trend. In most countries and regions, the 5-year relative survival rate exceeded 70%. However, substantial geographic disparities were observed. The prognosis was better in developed countries in Europe and America than that in less developed countries in Asia and Africa. Since 2000, the age-standardized 5-year relative survival was the highest in the United States at 98.5% (2007–2010), while it was the lowest in Punjab of India at 30.3% (2013–2016). The prognosis was poorest for patients aged ≥ 75, or for those diagnosed with distant or stage IV.
Conclusions
Although the survival has been improving over the past three decades, disparities between developed and less developed countries still persist. The extent of the popularization of prostate screening programs, the age or stage at diagnosis, and the sophistication of healthcare systems are likely to be significant contributing factors to these differences. Our results can provide fundamental statistics for formulating and refining relevant policies.
为了更好地了解前列腺癌生存的全球状况、时间趋势和地理差异,我们系统地收集了全球癌症登记处发表的前列腺癌生存研究。方法在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、中国医学信息网、中国知网、SEER等数据库中检索截至2025年4月30日的癌症存活研究文献。我们综合了自20世纪90年代以来的观察、相对和净生存数据,以及年龄标准化生存数据,并根据诊断年龄和分期进一步分层。结果总生存率较好,呈持续改善趋势。在大多数国家和地区,5年相对生存率超过70%。然而,观察到巨大的地理差异。欧美发达国家的预后好于亚非欠发达国家。自2000年以来,美国的年龄标准化5年相对生存率最高,为98.5%(2007-2010年),而印度旁遮普最低,为30.3%(2013-2016年)。年龄≥75岁的患者,或诊断为远处或iv期的患者预后最差。结论尽管在过去30年中生存率有所提高,但发达国家和欠发达国家之间的差距仍然存在。前列腺筛查项目的普及程度、诊断时的年龄或阶段以及医疗系统的复杂程度可能是造成这些差异的重要因素。研究结果可为相关政策的制定和完善提供基础统计数据。