Pore-Scale Simulation of Relative Permeability Hysteresis from a Workflow of Level-Set and Lattice-Boltzmann Methods: The Case of Consolidated Media with Low Pore-to-Throat Aspect Ratio
{"title":"Pore-Scale Simulation of Relative Permeability Hysteresis from a Workflow of Level-Set and Lattice-Boltzmann Methods: The Case of Consolidated Media with Low Pore-to-Throat Aspect Ratio","authors":"Johan Olav Helland, Espen Jettestuen, Olav Aursjø","doi":"10.1007/s11242-026-02308-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We present a workflow, based on level-set and lattice-Boltzmann methods, for numerical estimation of relative permeability and capillary pressure curves with hysteresis in capillary-dominated flow on segmented 3D rock images. Calculation of relative permeability from rock images has commonly been limited to studies of the bounding hysteresis loop and conventional porous media. Here, we demonstrate the workflow on an almost unexplored case, a consolidated sandstone with low pore-to-throat aspect ratio, and obtain a complex relative permeability hysteresis behavior, consistent with the few studies available for such media. The pore-scale simulations include primary drainage, followed by the main bounding hysteresis loop and scanning curves for secondary drainage and secondary imbibition. We also explore the impact of initial saturation after primary drainage on hysteresis and phase trapping. The relative permeability hysteresis is larger for the non-wetting phase than for the wetting phase, yet the extent of both decreases with increasing initial wetting-phase saturation. For the non-wetting-phase relative permeability, imbibition and drainage curves may cross, while scanning curves cross each other and exhibit a more significant hysteresis than the bounding loop. The role of trapped ganglia makes secondary processes different from primary. The behavior complies with hysteresis in phase connectivity, in which snap-off/coalescence breaks/recovers pathways. The results deviate significantly from the nested hysteresis loops seen for unconsolidated media and show that hysteresis in scanning curves cannot be neglected, indicating that flexible machine learning methods are better suited approaches than standard hysteresis models to implement this complex relative permeability behavior in reservoir simulators.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":804,"journal":{"name":"Transport in Porous Media","volume":"153 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11242-026-02308-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport in Porous Media","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11242-026-02308-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We present a workflow, based on level-set and lattice-Boltzmann methods, for numerical estimation of relative permeability and capillary pressure curves with hysteresis in capillary-dominated flow on segmented 3D rock images. Calculation of relative permeability from rock images has commonly been limited to studies of the bounding hysteresis loop and conventional porous media. Here, we demonstrate the workflow on an almost unexplored case, a consolidated sandstone with low pore-to-throat aspect ratio, and obtain a complex relative permeability hysteresis behavior, consistent with the few studies available for such media. The pore-scale simulations include primary drainage, followed by the main bounding hysteresis loop and scanning curves for secondary drainage and secondary imbibition. We also explore the impact of initial saturation after primary drainage on hysteresis and phase trapping. The relative permeability hysteresis is larger for the non-wetting phase than for the wetting phase, yet the extent of both decreases with increasing initial wetting-phase saturation. For the non-wetting-phase relative permeability, imbibition and drainage curves may cross, while scanning curves cross each other and exhibit a more significant hysteresis than the bounding loop. The role of trapped ganglia makes secondary processes different from primary. The behavior complies with hysteresis in phase connectivity, in which snap-off/coalescence breaks/recovers pathways. The results deviate significantly from the nested hysteresis loops seen for unconsolidated media and show that hysteresis in scanning curves cannot be neglected, indicating that flexible machine learning methods are better suited approaches than standard hysteresis models to implement this complex relative permeability behavior in reservoir simulators.
期刊介绍:
-Publishes original research on physical, chemical, and biological aspects of transport in porous media-
Papers on porous media research may originate in various areas of physics, chemistry, biology, natural or materials science, and engineering (chemical, civil, agricultural, petroleum, environmental, electrical, and mechanical engineering)-
Emphasizes theory, (numerical) modelling, laboratory work, and non-routine applications-
Publishes work of a fundamental nature, of interest to a wide readership, that provides novel insight into porous media processes-
Expanded in 2007 from 12 to 15 issues per year.
Transport in Porous Media publishes original research on physical and chemical aspects of transport phenomena in rigid and deformable porous media. These phenomena, occurring in single and multiphase flow in porous domains, can be governed by extensive quantities such as mass of a fluid phase, mass of component of a phase, momentum, or energy. Moreover, porous medium deformations can be induced by the transport phenomena, by chemical and electro-chemical activities such as swelling, or by external loading through forces and displacements. These porous media phenomena may be studied by researchers from various areas of physics, chemistry, biology, natural or materials science, and engineering (chemical, civil, agricultural, petroleum, environmental, electrical, and mechanical engineering).