Short-Term Relocation of Whole-Plant Corn Silage Does Not Alter Performance and Digestibility in Lambs

IF 2.6 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Rita de Cássia Almeida de Mendonça, Marcus Vinicius Santa Brígida Cardoso, Amanda Caroliny Marques Queiroz, Andreza Santos Amoras, Camilo Guimarães Rodrigues Cruz, Davide Rondina, Thiago Fernandes Bernardes, Cristian Faturi, Thiago Carvalho da Silva, Aníbal Coutinho do Rêgo
{"title":"Short-Term Relocation of Whole-Plant Corn Silage Does Not Alter Performance and Digestibility in Lambs","authors":"Rita de Cássia Almeida de Mendonça,&nbsp;Marcus Vinicius Santa Brígida Cardoso,&nbsp;Amanda Caroliny Marques Queiroz,&nbsp;Andreza Santos Amoras,&nbsp;Camilo Guimarães Rodrigues Cruz,&nbsp;Davide Rondina,&nbsp;Thiago Fernandes Bernardes,&nbsp;Cristian Faturi,&nbsp;Thiago Carvalho da Silva,&nbsp;Aníbal Coutinho do Rêgo","doi":"10.1111/gfs.70048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current study evaluated the relocation effect on whole-plant corn silage (WPCS), inoculated or not, on fermentation profile, aerobic stability (AS), nutrient digestibility, and lamb's performance. Corn was ensiled in 40 experimental silos (210 L) using a completely randomised design. Silos were stored for 90 day and the treatments were: silage without inoculants (WI) and without relocation (SISR), WI silage and relocation (SIR), silage inoculated with <i>Lentilactobacillus buchneri</i> and relocation (LBR), and silage inoculated with <i>L. buchneri</i> + <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> and relocation (LBLPR). Silages were exposed to air for 24 h, repacked and stored another 90 day. Twenty-four Santa Inês lambs (17.4 ± 2.0 kg) were used for digestibility and 36 (20.9 ± 2.0 kg) for performance assays. The SISR group had higher filamentous fungi, yeast, and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) counts. SIR had lower filamentous fungi and LAB counts and lactic acid (LA) concentrations than LBR and LBLPR. LBLPR had a higher LAB count and LA concentration than LBR. The AS and time, in h, for the maximum temperature (TM) of the silages and diets were lower in the SISR. SIR had a lower AS than LBR and LBLPR, whereas LBR had a lower AS than LBLPR. Except for non-fibrous carbohydrates, nutrient intake was higher for SIR than SISR diets. The treatments didn't affect digestibility, nitrogen balance, or performance. The performance of lambs fed relocated WPCS was not affected when the silage was exposed for 24 h during relocation, independent of microbial inoculation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gfs.70048","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.70048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study evaluated the relocation effect on whole-plant corn silage (WPCS), inoculated or not, on fermentation profile, aerobic stability (AS), nutrient digestibility, and lamb's performance. Corn was ensiled in 40 experimental silos (210 L) using a completely randomised design. Silos were stored for 90 day and the treatments were: silage without inoculants (WI) and without relocation (SISR), WI silage and relocation (SIR), silage inoculated with Lentilactobacillus buchneri and relocation (LBR), and silage inoculated with L. buchneri + Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and relocation (LBLPR). Silages were exposed to air for 24 h, repacked and stored another 90 day. Twenty-four Santa Inês lambs (17.4 ± 2.0 kg) were used for digestibility and 36 (20.9 ± 2.0 kg) for performance assays. The SISR group had higher filamentous fungi, yeast, and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) counts. SIR had lower filamentous fungi and LAB counts and lactic acid (LA) concentrations than LBR and LBLPR. LBLPR had a higher LAB count and LA concentration than LBR. The AS and time, in h, for the maximum temperature (TM) of the silages and diets were lower in the SISR. SIR had a lower AS than LBR and LBLPR, whereas LBR had a lower AS than LBLPR. Except for non-fibrous carbohydrates, nutrient intake was higher for SIR than SISR diets. The treatments didn't affect digestibility, nitrogen balance, or performance. The performance of lambs fed relocated WPCS was not affected when the silage was exposed for 24 h during relocation, independent of microbial inoculation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

短期迁移整株玉米青贮不会改变羔羊的生产性能和消化率
本研究评价了接种或未接种全株玉米青贮(WPCS)对发酵特性、好氧稳定性(AS)、营养物质消化率和羔羊生产性能的影响。采用完全随机设计,将玉米青贮在40个210 L的试验筒仓中。贮藏90 d,处理方式为:不添加接种剂的青贮(WI)和不迁移(SISR)、WI青贮和迁移(SIR)、接种布氏慢乳杆菌和迁移(LBR)的青贮和接种布氏乳杆菌+植物乳杆菌和迁移(LBLPR)的青贮。青贮在空气中暴露24小时,重新包装,再储存90天。选取24只Santa Inês羔羊(17.4±2.0 kg)进行消化率试验,36只(20.9±2.0 kg)进行性能试验。SISR组丝状真菌、酵母菌和乳酸菌(LAB)计数较高。与LBR和LBLPR相比,SIR的丝状真菌和LAB计数以及乳酸(LA)浓度较低。LBLPR的LAB计数和LA浓度均高于LBR。青贮饲料和饲料最高温度(TM)的AS和时间(h)在SISR中较低。SIR的AS低于LBR和LBLPR,而LBR的AS低于LBLPR。除非纤维性碳水化合物外,SIR组的营养摄入量高于SISR组。这些处理没有影响消化率、氮平衡或生产性能。在迁移过程中,青贮暴露24 h不影响羔羊的生产性能,与微生物接种无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书