CT-based Node-RADS for metastatic lymph node detection in colon cancer and influence of microsatellite instability

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Martina Conca, Giovanni Maria Rodà, Maurizio Cè, Letizia Di Meglio, Ejona Duka, Renato Fabrizio, Ludovica Baldari, Luigi Boni, Gianpaolo Carrafiello
{"title":"CT-based Node-RADS for metastatic lymph node detection in colon cancer and influence of microsatellite instability","authors":"Martina Conca,&nbsp;Giovanni Maria Rodà,&nbsp;Maurizio Cè,&nbsp;Letizia Di Meglio,&nbsp;Ejona Duka,&nbsp;Renato Fabrizio,&nbsp;Ludovica Baldari,&nbsp;Luigi Boni,&nbsp;Gianpaolo Carrafiello","doi":"10.1007/s00261-026-05477-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the CT-based Node-RADS score in differentiating benign and metastatic lymph nodes in colon cancer compared with standard size parameters and to assess the influence of microsatellite instability on diagnostic performance.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included 166 patients with histologically confirmed colon cancer who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT. Two radiologists, blinded to histopathological findings, evaluated a total of 166 lymph nodes under the supervision of a third radiologist, calculating Node-RADS scores and long and short diameters. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, stratifying data based on histopathological findings and microsatellite instability. Diagnostic performance for the various radiological variables was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Predictive logistic models were created.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-nine lymph nodes (42%) were histologically positive. Interobserver agreement for the Node-RADS score was excellent (κ = 0.88). All Node-RADS features were significantly associated with nodal status (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), with texture showing the strongest correlation (Cramér’s V = 0.74) and emerging as the only independent predictor in multivariable analysis (OR 5.10, 95% CI 2.46–12.05, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Overall, the Node-RADS score demonstrated good discriminative ability (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI 0.72–0.86), although not superior to short axis diameter (AUC = 0.75, 95% CI 0.68–0.83). Optimal diagnostic accuracy (0.77, 95% CI 0.70–0.93) was observed using a cutoff between Node-RADS categories 3 and 4. In tumors with microsatellite instability, Node-RADS performance decreased (AUC = 0.42, 95% CI 0.19–0.66) compared with microsatellite-stable tumors (AUC = 0.83, 95% CI 0.76–0.9). Repeated 5-fold cross-validation showed that the composite Node-RADS score was not inferior to logistic regression models including individual imaging features (AUC 0.786–0.802; all DeLong <i>p</i> &gt; 0.01).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Node-RADS score demonstrates good diagnostic performance for nodal staging in colon cancer; however, its superiority over standard size criteria was not confirmed. Its diagnostic performance declines in tumors with microsatellite instability, underscoring the potential influence of microsatellite status on the reliability of CT-based lymph node assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"51 10","pages":"5319 - 5330"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-026-05477-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the CT-based Node-RADS score in differentiating benign and metastatic lymph nodes in colon cancer compared with standard size parameters and to assess the influence of microsatellite instability on diagnostic performance.

Methods

This retrospective study included 166 patients with histologically confirmed colon cancer who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT. Two radiologists, blinded to histopathological findings, evaluated a total of 166 lymph nodes under the supervision of a third radiologist, calculating Node-RADS scores and long and short diameters. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, stratifying data based on histopathological findings and microsatellite instability. Diagnostic performance for the various radiological variables was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Predictive logistic models were created.

Results

Sixty-nine lymph nodes (42%) were histologically positive. Interobserver agreement for the Node-RADS score was excellent (κ = 0.88). All Node-RADS features were significantly associated with nodal status (p < 0.001), with texture showing the strongest correlation (Cramér’s V = 0.74) and emerging as the only independent predictor in multivariable analysis (OR 5.10, 95% CI 2.46–12.05, p < 0.001). Overall, the Node-RADS score demonstrated good discriminative ability (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI 0.72–0.86), although not superior to short axis diameter (AUC = 0.75, 95% CI 0.68–0.83). Optimal diagnostic accuracy (0.77, 95% CI 0.70–0.93) was observed using a cutoff between Node-RADS categories 3 and 4. In tumors with microsatellite instability, Node-RADS performance decreased (AUC = 0.42, 95% CI 0.19–0.66) compared with microsatellite-stable tumors (AUC = 0.83, 95% CI 0.76–0.9). Repeated 5-fold cross-validation showed that the composite Node-RADS score was not inferior to logistic regression models including individual imaging features (AUC 0.786–0.802; all DeLong p > 0.01).

Conclusion

The Node-RADS score demonstrates good diagnostic performance for nodal staging in colon cancer; however, its superiority over standard size criteria was not confirmed. Its diagnostic performance declines in tumors with microsatellite instability, underscoring the potential influence of microsatellite status on the reliability of CT-based lymph node assessment.

基于ct的node - rads检测结肠癌转移淋巴结及微卫星不稳定性的影响
目的:评价基于ct的Node-RADS评分与标准尺寸参数鉴别结肠癌良性和转移淋巴结的诊断准确性,并评估微卫星不稳定性对诊断效能的影响。方法:本回顾性研究纳入166例经组织学证实的结肠癌患者,术前行对比增强CT检查。两名放射科医生对组织病理学结果不知情,在第三名放射科医生的监督下,对166个淋巴结进行评估,计算淋巴结rads评分和长、短直径。进行单因素和多因素分析,根据组织病理学结果和微卫星不稳定性对数据进行分层。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估各种放射学变量的诊断性能。建立了预测逻辑模型。结果:69个淋巴结(42%)组织学阳性。观察者间对Node-RADS评分的一致性非常好(κ = 0.88)。所有Node-RADS特征均与淋巴结状态显著相关(p < 0.01)。结论:Node-RADS评分对结肠癌分期有较好的诊断价值;然而,它比标准尺寸标准的优越性还没有得到证实。在微卫星不稳定的肿瘤中,其诊断性能下降,强调了微卫星状态对ct淋巴结评估可靠性的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书