David T. Fetzer, Yuko Kono, Fabio Piscaglia, Christoph F Dietrich, Franca Meloni, Qiang Lu, Dirk-Andre Clevert, Andrej Lyshchik, Yasunori Minami, Jeong Min Lee, Tae Kyoung Kim, Hyun-Jung Jang, Masatoshi Kudo, Stephanie R. Wilson
{"title":"Contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS nonradiation treatment response assessment: applications, challenges, and future directions","authors":"David T. Fetzer, Yuko Kono, Fabio Piscaglia, Christoph F Dietrich, Franca Meloni, Qiang Lu, Dirk-Andre Clevert, Andrej Lyshchik, Yasunori Minami, Jeong Min Lee, Tae Kyoung Kim, Hyun-Jung Jang, Masatoshi Kudo, Stephanie R. Wilson","doi":"10.1007/s00261-026-05469-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) requires nuanced treatment response assessment to balance oncologic control with preservation of liver function. CT and MRI, cornerstones of response evaluation, are often limited by contraindications to their use or indeterminate findings. The recently introduced ACR LI-RADS Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Non-Radiation Treatment Response Assessment (TRA) algorithm offers a real-time, radiation-free alternative for evaluating treated HCC after ablation, transarterial therapies, or surgical resection. This review summarizes the CEUS TRA lexicon, criteria, and application across common clinical scenarios, emphasizing its value as a troubleshooting tool when conventional imaging is non-evaluable due to artifacts, contrast limitations, or heterogeneous post-treatment changes. We highlight pitfalls unique to CEUS interpretation, including poor lesion visibility, resection cavity complexity, and the inability to assess extrahepatic disease. Emerging areas include CEUS assessment after radiation-based therapies and the potential for integration of Kupffer-cell–specific contrast agents. Together, these developments position CEUS as an increasingly important modality for precise, timely, and individualized management of HCC following non-radiation locoregional therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"51 10","pages":"4968 - 4986"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00261-026-05469-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-026-05469-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) requires nuanced treatment response assessment to balance oncologic control with preservation of liver function. CT and MRI, cornerstones of response evaluation, are often limited by contraindications to their use or indeterminate findings. The recently introduced ACR LI-RADS Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Non-Radiation Treatment Response Assessment (TRA) algorithm offers a real-time, radiation-free alternative for evaluating treated HCC after ablation, transarterial therapies, or surgical resection. This review summarizes the CEUS TRA lexicon, criteria, and application across common clinical scenarios, emphasizing its value as a troubleshooting tool when conventional imaging is non-evaluable due to artifacts, contrast limitations, or heterogeneous post-treatment changes. We highlight pitfalls unique to CEUS interpretation, including poor lesion visibility, resection cavity complexity, and the inability to assess extrahepatic disease. Emerging areas include CEUS assessment after radiation-based therapies and the potential for integration of Kupffer-cell–specific contrast agents. Together, these developments position CEUS as an increasingly important modality for precise, timely, and individualized management of HCC following non-radiation locoregional therapy.
期刊介绍:
Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section.
Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology:
· Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)
· Published in Cooperation with:
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)
European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)
Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR)
· Efficient handling and Expeditious review
· Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style
· Global readership
· Readers can earn CME credits