{"title":"Assessment of the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) among People with Diabetic Foot Ulcers at a Tertiary Care Centre in South India.","authors":"Kaviya Suresh, Satyavani Kumpatla, Arutselvi Devarajan, Vijay Viswanathan","doi":"10.1177/15347346261441107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundLiterature on Financial Toxicity (FT) using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity - Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT) among people with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is unavailable in India. This study assessed FT among people with DFUs using the COST measure.Materials and MethodsA total of 234 participants with DFUs were included from April-June 2025 in a tertiary care diabetes center and administered with COST-FACIT and sleep health (RU-SATED) questionnaires. Demographic, clinical, socio-economic status (SES), biochemical, co-morbidities and complications, cost of illness were recorded. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of FT.ResultsAround 85% of the participants had FT in which 15.8% experienced high FT. Lower socio-economic group recorded the lowest COST score (15 ± 6.5). Nearly one-third underwent minor (28.2%) and major (3.8%) amputations. DFU treatment expenses included inpatient costs: ₹98,167 ($1180), medications: ₹6869 ($83), offloading devices: ₹5374 ($65), and indirect cost: ₹4604 ($55). Cost coping behaviours identified were money borrowed (49.6%) and selling belongings (39.7%). Individuals with higher FT reported poor sleep health. Lower SES (AOR=24.9, p < 0.001), DFU duration>3years (AOR=2.3, p = 0.024), delayed doctor's visit (AOR=4.4, p = 0.048) and revascularization procedure (AOR=3.2, p = 0.014) were significant predictors of higher FT.ConclusionAround 85% of individuals with DFUs experienced FT. Early foot screening, social and health protection schemes, and appropriate policy measures would possibly alleviate high FT.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346261441107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346261441107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundLiterature on Financial Toxicity (FT) using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity - Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT) among people with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is unavailable in India. This study assessed FT among people with DFUs using the COST measure.Materials and MethodsA total of 234 participants with DFUs were included from April-June 2025 in a tertiary care diabetes center and administered with COST-FACIT and sleep health (RU-SATED) questionnaires. Demographic, clinical, socio-economic status (SES), biochemical, co-morbidities and complications, cost of illness were recorded. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of FT.ResultsAround 85% of the participants had FT in which 15.8% experienced high FT. Lower socio-economic group recorded the lowest COST score (15 ± 6.5). Nearly one-third underwent minor (28.2%) and major (3.8%) amputations. DFU treatment expenses included inpatient costs: ₹98,167 ($1180), medications: ₹6869 ($83), offloading devices: ₹5374 ($65), and indirect cost: ₹4604 ($55). Cost coping behaviours identified were money borrowed (49.6%) and selling belongings (39.7%). Individuals with higher FT reported poor sleep health. Lower SES (AOR=24.9, p < 0.001), DFU duration>3years (AOR=2.3, p = 0.024), delayed doctor's visit (AOR=4.4, p = 0.048) and revascularization procedure (AOR=3.2, p = 0.014) were significant predictors of higher FT.ConclusionAround 85% of individuals with DFUs experienced FT. Early foot screening, social and health protection schemes, and appropriate policy measures would possibly alleviate high FT.
背景:在印度尚无关于糖尿病足溃疡(DFUs)患者使用财务毒性综合评分-慢性疾病治疗功能评估(COST-FACIT)的财务毒性(FT)的文献。本研究使用COST方法评估dfu患者的FT。材料和方法于2025年4月至6月在一家三级保健糖尿病中心共纳入234名dfu患者,并对其进行成本- facit和睡眠健康(RU-SATED)问卷调查。记录了人口统计学、临床、社会经济地位(SES)、生化、合并症和并发症、疾病费用。结果约85%的参与者有FT,其中15.8%的参与者有高FT,较低社会经济群体的COST得分最低(15±6.5)。近三分之一接受了轻微(28.2%)和严重(3.8%)截肢。DFU治疗费用包括住院费:98,167卢比(1180美元),药物:6869卢比(83美元),卸载设备:5374卢比(65美元),间接费用:4604卢比(55美元)。成本应对行为包括借钱(49.6%)和变卖财物(39.7%)。FT较高的人睡眠健康状况较差。较低的社会经济地位(AOR=24.9, p = 0.024)、延迟就诊(AOR=4.4, p = 0.048)和血血重建术(AOR=3.2, p = 0.014)是高FT的显著预测因素。结论约85%的DFUs患者发生过FT,早期足部筛查、社会和健康保护计划以及适当的政策措施可能缓解高FT。