Risk factors for sialocele after parotidectomy.

IF 2.4
Chia-Hsien Wu, Hsueh-An Sun, Heng-Jui Hsu
{"title":"Risk factors for sialocele after parotidectomy.","authors":"Chia-Hsien Wu, Hsueh-An Sun, Heng-Jui Hsu","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parotidectomy, the surgical excision of the parotid gland to treat tumors, is frequently complicated by sialocele formation-a subcutaneous accumulation of saliva that presents clinically as a cystic mass. With reported incidences ranging from 0% to 44%, the specific etiology remains incompletely defined. This study aimed to identify independent predictors of postoperative sialocele formation to suggest targeted preventive strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study analyzed patients undergoing parotidectomy at a single tertiary center from 2014 to 2020. Data including patient demographics, comorbidities, lifestyle habits, operative details, and postoperative care were collected. The primary clinical outcome was clinically diagnosed sialocele. Independent predictors were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression, calculating adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 597 subjects (mean age 52.2 ± 14.4 years; 58.5% male), 54 (9.0%) developed a sialocele. Multivariable analysis revealed significant independent predictors: betel nut use (aOR = 2.37; 95% CI, 1.13-4.97; p = 0.023), history of cerebrovascular accident (aOR = 4.10; 95% CI, 1.30-14.86; p = 0.032), surgical drain removal in <3 days (aOR = 1.89; 95% CI, 1.04-3.44; p = 0.036), and a diagnosis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma (aOR = 4.18; 95% CI, 1.37-12.78; p = 0.012). Variables like age, sex, tumor size, and operative method showed no significant association.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Betel nut use, a history of stroke, early drain removal, and malignant pathology are significant independent risk factors for postoperative sialoceles. Adjusting perioperative management, particularly delaying drain removal, may lower this risk. Tumor size and operative method did not influence outcomes. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these single-center retrospective findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","volume":" ","pages":"378-382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13193285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Parotidectomy, the surgical excision of the parotid gland to treat tumors, is frequently complicated by sialocele formation-a subcutaneous accumulation of saliva that presents clinically as a cystic mass. With reported incidences ranging from 0% to 44%, the specific etiology remains incompletely defined. This study aimed to identify independent predictors of postoperative sialocele formation to suggest targeted preventive strategies.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study analyzed patients undergoing parotidectomy at a single tertiary center from 2014 to 2020. Data including patient demographics, comorbidities, lifestyle habits, operative details, and postoperative care were collected. The primary clinical outcome was clinically diagnosed sialocele. Independent predictors were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression, calculating adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs.

Results: Among 597 subjects (mean age 52.2 ± 14.4 years; 58.5% male), 54 (9.0%) developed a sialocele. Multivariable analysis revealed significant independent predictors: betel nut use (aOR = 2.37; 95% CI, 1.13-4.97; p = 0.023), history of cerebrovascular accident (aOR = 4.10; 95% CI, 1.30-14.86; p = 0.032), surgical drain removal in <3 days (aOR = 1.89; 95% CI, 1.04-3.44; p = 0.036), and a diagnosis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma (aOR = 4.18; 95% CI, 1.37-12.78; p = 0.012). Variables like age, sex, tumor size, and operative method showed no significant association.

Conclusion: Betel nut use, a history of stroke, early drain removal, and malignant pathology are significant independent risk factors for postoperative sialoceles. Adjusting perioperative management, particularly delaying drain removal, may lower this risk. Tumor size and operative method did not influence outcomes. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these single-center retrospective findings.

腮腺切除术后涎腺囊肿的危险因素。
背景:腮腺切除术是一种切除腮腺以治疗肿瘤的手术,经常并发涎腺囊肿形成——一种皮下唾液积聚,临床上表现为囊性肿块。报告的发病率从0%到44%不等,具体病因仍不完全确定。本研究旨在确定术后涎腺囊肿形成的独立预测因素,以提出有针对性的预防策略。方法:回顾性队列研究分析2014年至2020年在单一三级中心接受腮腺切除术的患者。收集的数据包括患者人口统计、合并症、生活习惯、手术细节和术后护理。主要临床结果为临床诊断为涎腺囊肿。使用多变量逻辑回归评估独立预测因子,计算校正优势比(aORs)和95%置信区间(ci)。结果:597例患者(平均年龄52.2±14.4岁,男性58.5%)中,54例(9.0%)发生涎腺膨出。多变量分析显示了显著的独立预测因子:槟榔使用(aOR = 2.37; 95% CI, 1.13-4.97, p = 0.023)、脑血管意外史(aOR = 4.10; 95% CI, 1.30-14.86, p = 0.032)、手术引流少于3天(aOR = 1.89; 95% CI, 1.04-3.44, p = 0.036)、粘液表皮样癌诊断(aOR = 4.18; 95% CI, 1.37-12.78, p = 0.012)。年龄、性别、肿瘤大小、手术方式等变量无显著相关性。结论:使用槟榔、卒中史、早期引流、恶性病理是术后涎腺囊肿的重要独立危险因素。调整围手术期管理,特别是延迟引流,可以降低这种风险。肿瘤大小和手术方式对预后无影响。需要前瞻性研究来证实这些单中心回顾性研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书