Residual Patent Ductus Arteriosus After Surgical and Transcatheter Closure: Anatomical Challenges and Transcatheter Re-Intervention Strategies.

IF 0.6
Utku Pamuk, Ahmet Burak Şimşek, Hazım Alper Gürsu
{"title":"Residual Patent Ductus Arteriosus After Surgical and Transcatheter Closure: Anatomical Challenges and Transcatheter Re-Intervention Strategies.","authors":"Utku Pamuk, Ahmet Burak Şimşek, Hazım Alper Gürsu","doi":"10.5543/tkda.2026.14257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to present our single-center experience with transcatheter re-intervention for residual patent ductus arteriosus (rPDA), with particular emphasis on anatomical features and technical approaches.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed six patients (median age 2.9 years; range, 1.2-16) who underwent transcatheter closure of rPDA between January 2021 and May 2025. Re-intervention was performed for persistent residual shunting in the presence of previously implanted foreign material, based primarily on hemodynamic and anatomical considerations; infective endarteritis and hemolysis were considered additional potential risks. Procedural records, angiographic findings, device selection, and outcomes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five patients had undergone prior transcatheter patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure and one had surgical ligation. Among the transcatheter cases, persistent shunting was due to delayed malposition (n = 2), incomplete occlusion (n = 2), and a non-thrombosed coil (n = 1). In two patients, the original Amplatzer Duct Occluder II (ADO II) device was malpositioned toward the pulmonary artery; therefore, a second device was deployed encompassing the prior occluder. In one patient, a non-thrombosed coil with persistent central flow created a 'stent-like' configuration, and closure was achieved by implanting a new device with its discs covering the coil. In the surgical case, both the residual ductus and an adjacent aortopulmonary collateral artery were successfully occluded with a single device. Complete closure was achieved in all patients without complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this single-center case series, transcatheter re-intervention for residual PDA was feasible even in the presence of malpositioned prior devices. Careful anatomical evaluation and individualized procedural planning enabled successful closure of residual shunts.</p>","PeriodicalId":94261,"journal":{"name":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir","volume":" ","pages":"427-432"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2026.14257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to present our single-center experience with transcatheter re-intervention for residual patent ductus arteriosus (rPDA), with particular emphasis on anatomical features and technical approaches.

Method: We retrospectively reviewed six patients (median age 2.9 years; range, 1.2-16) who underwent transcatheter closure of rPDA between January 2021 and May 2025. Re-intervention was performed for persistent residual shunting in the presence of previously implanted foreign material, based primarily on hemodynamic and anatomical considerations; infective endarteritis and hemolysis were considered additional potential risks. Procedural records, angiographic findings, device selection, and outcomes were analyzed.

Results: Five patients had undergone prior transcatheter patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure and one had surgical ligation. Among the transcatheter cases, persistent shunting was due to delayed malposition (n = 2), incomplete occlusion (n = 2), and a non-thrombosed coil (n = 1). In two patients, the original Amplatzer Duct Occluder II (ADO II) device was malpositioned toward the pulmonary artery; therefore, a second device was deployed encompassing the prior occluder. In one patient, a non-thrombosed coil with persistent central flow created a 'stent-like' configuration, and closure was achieved by implanting a new device with its discs covering the coil. In the surgical case, both the residual ductus and an adjacent aortopulmonary collateral artery were successfully occluded with a single device. Complete closure was achieved in all patients without complications.

Conclusion: In this single-center case series, transcatheter re-intervention for residual PDA was feasible even in the presence of malpositioned prior devices. Careful anatomical evaluation and individualized procedural planning enabled successful closure of residual shunts.

手术和经导管关闭后残余动脉导管未闭:解剖学挑战和经导管再介入策略。
目的:本研究的目的是介绍经导管再介入治疗残余动脉导管未闭(rPDA)的单中心经验,特别强调解剖特征和技术方法。方法:我们回顾性分析了2021年1月至2025年5月期间接受经导管关闭rPDA的6例患者(中位年龄2.9岁,范围1.2-16岁)。基于血流动力学和解剖学的考虑,在先前植入的异物存在的情况下,对持续残留的分流进行再次干预;感染性动脉内膜炎和溶血被认为是额外的潜在风险。分析手术记录、血管造影结果、器械选择和结果。结果:5例患者行经导管动脉导管未闭闭锁术,1例行结扎术。在经导管病例中,持续分流是由于延迟错位(n = 2),不完全闭塞(n = 2)和非血栓线圈(n = 1)。在2例患者中,原来的Amplatzer导管闭塞器II (ADO II)装置被错误地定位到肺动脉;因此,第二个装置被部署包围先前的封堵器。在一名患者中,持续中心血流的非血栓线圈形成了“支架样”结构,通过植入一个新的装置,其圆盘覆盖线圈,实现了闭合。在手术病例中,残余导管和相邻的肺动脉侧支动脉都成功地用一个装置闭塞。所有患者均获得完全闭合,无并发症。结论:在这个单中心病例系列中,即使存在先前设备错位,经导管再介入治疗残余PDA也是可行的。仔细的解剖评估和个性化的手术计划使残余分流成功关闭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书