Study on the concordance in the diagnostic efficacy between CEUS LI-RADS and CT/MR LI-RADS for HCC.

Peihua Wang, Yanqing Wang, Guojuan Wang, Qi Li, Dan Yang, Fang Nie
{"title":"Study on the concordance in the diagnostic efficacy between CEUS LI-RADS and CT/MR LI-RADS for HCC.","authors":"Peihua Wang, Yanqing Wang, Guojuan Wang, Qi Li, Dan Yang, Fang Nie","doi":"10.1177/13860291251382301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo investigate the diagnostic concordance between CEUS LI-RADS and CT/MR LI-RADS for focal intrahepatic lesions in patients at high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.MethodsRetrospective analysis of imaging data of patients at high risk of HCC attending our hospital from January 2018 to January 2021, 165 lesions were classified according to CEUS LI-RADS and CT/MR LI-RADS, respectively, using puncture biopsy or surgical pathology as the criteria. The kappa concordance test was used to evaluate the classification results of intrahepatic focal lesions in high-risk groups.ResultsThe concordance between CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS for the classification of intrahepatic focal lesions in the high-risk group of HCC was statistically different (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and the agreement between the two imaging methods was general (kappa = 0.345,<i>P</i> < 0.001). The positive predictive value of CEUS LR-5 for HCC was 95.4%, and the positive predictive value of CT/MRI LR-5 had a positive predictive value of 94.6% for HCC, and the difference between CEUS and CT/MRI LR-5 for HCC was not statistically significant. The positive predictive value of CEUS LR-M for non-HCC malignancies was 34.1%, and the positive predictive value of CT/MRI LR-M for non-HCC malignancies was 76.5%, and the difference between CEUS and CT/MRI LR-M had a statistically significant difference in the positive predictive value for non-HCC malignancies (<i>P</i> < 0.05).ConclusionsThe classification results of CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS for focal intrahepatic lesions in a high-risk group of HCC were in general agreement, but both had high diagnostic performance, and both had high specificity and positive predictive value using LR-5 as the diagnostic imaging standard for HCC, while the differential diagnostic value of LR-M for non-HCC malignant tumors and HCC still needs to be further investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":93943,"journal":{"name":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","volume":" ","pages":"68-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13860291251382301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate the diagnostic concordance between CEUS LI-RADS and CT/MR LI-RADS for focal intrahepatic lesions in patients at high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.MethodsRetrospective analysis of imaging data of patients at high risk of HCC attending our hospital from January 2018 to January 2021, 165 lesions were classified according to CEUS LI-RADS and CT/MR LI-RADS, respectively, using puncture biopsy or surgical pathology as the criteria. The kappa concordance test was used to evaluate the classification results of intrahepatic focal lesions in high-risk groups.ResultsThe concordance between CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS for the classification of intrahepatic focal lesions in the high-risk group of HCC was statistically different (P < 0.001), and the agreement between the two imaging methods was general (kappa = 0.345,P < 0.001). The positive predictive value of CEUS LR-5 for HCC was 95.4%, and the positive predictive value of CT/MRI LR-5 had a positive predictive value of 94.6% for HCC, and the difference between CEUS and CT/MRI LR-5 for HCC was not statistically significant. The positive predictive value of CEUS LR-M for non-HCC malignancies was 34.1%, and the positive predictive value of CT/MRI LR-M for non-HCC malignancies was 76.5%, and the difference between CEUS and CT/MRI LR-M had a statistically significant difference in the positive predictive value for non-HCC malignancies (P < 0.05).ConclusionsThe classification results of CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS for focal intrahepatic lesions in a high-risk group of HCC were in general agreement, but both had high diagnostic performance, and both had high specificity and positive predictive value using LR-5 as the diagnostic imaging standard for HCC, while the differential diagnostic value of LR-M for non-HCC malignant tumors and HCC still needs to be further investigated.

超声造影LI-RADS与CT/MR LI-RADS诊断HCC疗效一致性研究。
目的:探讨超声造影(CEUS) LI-RADS与CT/MR LI-RADS对肝癌高危患者局灶性肝内病变诊断的一致性。方法:回顾性分析我院2018年1月至2021年1月HCC高危患者的影像学资料,以穿刺活检或手术病理为标准,分别根据CEUS LI-RADS和CT/MR LI-RADS对165个病变进行分类。采用kappa一致性检验评价高危人群肝内局灶性病变的分级结果。结果:CEUS与CT/MRI LI-RADS对HCC高危组肝内局灶病变分级的一致性有统计学差异(P P P PCEUS与CT/MRI LI-RADS对HCC高危组局灶性肝内病变的分类结果基本一致,但两者诊断效能均较高,以LR-5作为HCC的诊断影像学标准均具有较高的特异性和阳性预测价值,而LR-M对非HCC恶性肿瘤和HCC的鉴别诊断价值仍需进一步探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书