Accuracy and influencing factors of hepatic venous pressure gradient, spleen stiffness and liver stiffness in the detection of portal hypertension with liver cirrhosis.

Baohua Li, Fangyu Xu, Dongjun Su, Hui Zhu, Shuangxi Li
{"title":"Accuracy and influencing factors of hepatic venous pressure gradient, spleen stiffness and liver stiffness in the detection of portal hypertension with liver cirrhosis.","authors":"Baohua Li, Fangyu Xu, Dongjun Su, Hui Zhu, Shuangxi Li","doi":"10.1177/13860291261432456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeTo assess the accuracy of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), spleen stiffness (SS) and liver stiffness (LS) for detecting portal hypertension (PH).MethodsWe measured HVPG, SS, LS and portal pressure gradient (PPG) in 104 patients with liver cirrhosis from April 2019 to April 2024. Correlations between these parameters and PH were analyzed using Pearson correlation or Spearman's rank correlation test appropriate. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Multiple linear regression analysis was to identify factors independently associated with HVPG, SS and LS.ResultsHVPG and SS were significantly correlated with PPG (p < 0.005), whereas LS showed no significant correlation with PPG (p = 0.532). For prediction of PH defined by PPG≥12, 20 and 25 mmHg, areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of HVPG were 0.983, 0.875 and 0.680, and the AUC of SS were 0.764, 0.922 and 0.700, respectively. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that factors independently associated with HVPG included aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL) and previous bleeding, while those associated with SS were white blood cell count (WBC) and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium (MELD-Na) score.ConclusionHVPG and SS had favorable diagnostic performance for identifying PH in patients with liver cirrhosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":93943,"journal":{"name":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","volume":" ","pages":"43-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13860291261432456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeTo assess the accuracy of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), spleen stiffness (SS) and liver stiffness (LS) for detecting portal hypertension (PH).MethodsWe measured HVPG, SS, LS and portal pressure gradient (PPG) in 104 patients with liver cirrhosis from April 2019 to April 2024. Correlations between these parameters and PH were analyzed using Pearson correlation or Spearman's rank correlation test appropriate. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Multiple linear regression analysis was to identify factors independently associated with HVPG, SS and LS.ResultsHVPG and SS were significantly correlated with PPG (p < 0.005), whereas LS showed no significant correlation with PPG (p = 0.532). For prediction of PH defined by PPG≥12, 20 and 25 mmHg, areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of HVPG were 0.983, 0.875 and 0.680, and the AUC of SS were 0.764, 0.922 and 0.700, respectively. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that factors independently associated with HVPG included aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL) and previous bleeding, while those associated with SS were white blood cell count (WBC) and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium (MELD-Na) score.ConclusionHVPG and SS had favorable diagnostic performance for identifying PH in patients with liver cirrhosis.

肝静脉压梯度、脾僵硬度、肝僵硬度检测肝硬化门静脉高压的准确性及影响因素
目的评价肝静脉压梯度(HVPG)、脾僵硬度(SS)、肝僵硬度(LS)检测门静脉高压症(PH)的准确性。方法对2019年4月~ 2024年4月104例肝硬化患者进行HVPG、SS、LS和门静脉压力梯度(PPG)测定。适当采用Pearson相关或Spearman秩相关检验分析这些参数与PH的相关性。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评价诊断效果。多元线性回归分析确定与HVPG、SS和LS独立相关的因素。结果shvpg、SS与PPG呈显著相关(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书