Mapping patient-centered communication and patient trust in healthcare providers: A psychological network approach considering patients' discussion about online health information.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Yu Zheng, Xinshu Zhao
{"title":"Mapping patient-centered communication and patient trust in healthcare providers: A psychological network approach considering patients' discussion about online health information.","authors":"Yu Zheng, Xinshu Zhao","doi":"10.1177/13591053261437581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient-centered communication (PCC) is considered efficient in building patient trust in healthcare providers, but little is known about how various dimensions of the two constructs interact. Moreover, our understanding of the role of patients' communicative behaviors in such interactions is limited. Addressing the gaps, this study analyzed survey data (<i>N</i> = 4038) with psychological network analysis to explore multidimensional interactions, identify the central dimensions of the two focal constructs, and compare networks based on whether patients discuss online health information with healthcare providers. Results showed different interconnection patterns among patients who discuss online health information with healthcare providers and patients who do not. This study contributes to the literature by disentangling multidimensional connections between PCC and patient trust in healthcare providers and highlights the significance of patients' participation and preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"13591053261437581"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053261437581","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient-centered communication (PCC) is considered efficient in building patient trust in healthcare providers, but little is known about how various dimensions of the two constructs interact. Moreover, our understanding of the role of patients' communicative behaviors in such interactions is limited. Addressing the gaps, this study analyzed survey data (N = 4038) with psychological network analysis to explore multidimensional interactions, identify the central dimensions of the two focal constructs, and compare networks based on whether patients discuss online health information with healthcare providers. Results showed different interconnection patterns among patients who discuss online health information with healthcare providers and patients who do not. This study contributes to the literature by disentangling multidimensional connections between PCC and patient trust in healthcare providers and highlights the significance of patients' participation and preferences.

映射以患者为中心的沟通和患者对医疗保健提供者的信任:考虑患者对在线健康信息讨论的心理网络方法。
以患者为中心的沟通(PCC)被认为是有效的建立患者对医疗保健提供者的信任,但鲜为人知的是如何两个结构的各个维度相互作用。此外,我们对患者的交际行为在这种互动中的作用的理解是有限的。为了解决这些差距,本研究使用心理网络分析分析调查数据(N = 4038),以探索多维互动,确定两个焦点结构的中心维度,并根据患者是否与医疗保健提供者讨论在线健康信息来比较网络。结果显示,与医疗保健提供者讨论在线健康信息的患者和不讨论在线健康信息的患者之间的相互联系模式不同。本研究通过解开PCC与患者对医疗保健提供者信任之间的多维联系,并强调了患者参与和偏好的重要性,为文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health Psychology
Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书