Acoustic Scene-Aware Processing and Auditory Model-Based Compensation Strategies.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Torsten Dau, Tobias May
{"title":"Acoustic Scene-Aware Processing and Auditory Model-Based Compensation Strategies.","authors":"Torsten Dau, Tobias May","doi":"10.1007/s10162-026-01043-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite significant advances in our understanding of human hearing and assistive hearing technologies, the benefits of hearing loss compensation continue to vary widely across individuals. A central challenge is the complexity and heterogeneity of hearing loss, whose perceptual consequences often extend far beyond reduced sensitivity. Conventional strategies rely on signal processing algorithms-such as spatial filtering, noise reduction, and dynamic range compression-to improve audibility and enhance target signals. These components are usually optimized in isolation, yet their combined effects may interfere with one another and therefore do not necessarily yield an overall benefit. More recently, machine learning techniques have been used to further improve the performance of individual components. To tailor compensation strategies to specific acoustic environments or listeners, various steering mechanisms have also been proposed, guided by acoustic cues, audiovisual input, or listener attention. While these approaches show promise, a consistent and objective computational target for optimization has yet to be established. As an alternative, auditory model-based strategies, increasingly combined with machine learning, have emerged. These approaches aim to minimize the discrepancy between simulated auditory representations of normal and impaired hearing, thereby providing a physiologically motivated optimization goal. Although both categories of strategies offer considerable potential, achieving effective compensation under real-time, real-world conditions remains a major challenge. This paper reviews opportunities and limitations of these approaches for individualized hearing aid compensation.</p>","PeriodicalId":56283,"journal":{"name":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":"495-511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13503992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-026-01043-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite significant advances in our understanding of human hearing and assistive hearing technologies, the benefits of hearing loss compensation continue to vary widely across individuals. A central challenge is the complexity and heterogeneity of hearing loss, whose perceptual consequences often extend far beyond reduced sensitivity. Conventional strategies rely on signal processing algorithms-such as spatial filtering, noise reduction, and dynamic range compression-to improve audibility and enhance target signals. These components are usually optimized in isolation, yet their combined effects may interfere with one another and therefore do not necessarily yield an overall benefit. More recently, machine learning techniques have been used to further improve the performance of individual components. To tailor compensation strategies to specific acoustic environments or listeners, various steering mechanisms have also been proposed, guided by acoustic cues, audiovisual input, or listener attention. While these approaches show promise, a consistent and objective computational target for optimization has yet to be established. As an alternative, auditory model-based strategies, increasingly combined with machine learning, have emerged. These approaches aim to minimize the discrepancy between simulated auditory representations of normal and impaired hearing, thereby providing a physiologically motivated optimization goal. Although both categories of strategies offer considerable potential, achieving effective compensation under real-time, real-world conditions remains a major challenge. This paper reviews opportunities and limitations of these approaches for individualized hearing aid compensation.

声场景感知处理与基于听觉模型的补偿策略。
尽管我们对人类听力和辅助听力技术的理解取得了重大进展,但听力损失补偿的好处在个体之间仍然存在很大差异。一个核心挑战是听力损失的复杂性和异质性,其感知后果往往远远超出灵敏度降低。传统的策略依赖于信号处理算法——如空间滤波、降噪和动态范围压缩——来提高可听性和增强目标信号。这些成分通常是单独优化的,但它们的综合效果可能相互干扰,因此不一定产生总体效益。最近,机器学习技术已被用于进一步提高单个组件的性能。为了使补偿策略适应特定的声音环境或听者,还提出了各种由声音提示、视听输入或听者注意引导的转向机制。虽然这些方法显示出希望,但尚未建立一致和客观的优化计算目标。作为一种替代方案,基于听觉模型的策略,越来越多地与机器学习相结合,已经出现。这些方法旨在最大限度地减少正常听力和受损听力的模拟听觉表征之间的差异,从而提供一个生理动机的优化目标。尽管这两类策略都具有相当大的潜力,但在实时、现实条件下实现有效补偿仍然是主要挑战。本文综述了这些个性化助听器补偿方法的机会和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: JARO is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to otolaryngology and communications sciences, including hearing, balance, speech and voice. JARO welcomes submissions describing experimental research that investigates the mechanisms underlying problems of basic and/or clinical significance. Authors are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the kinds of papers carried by JARO by looking at past issues. Clinical case studies and pharmaceutical screens are not likely to be considered unless they reveal underlying mechanisms. Methods papers are not encouraged unless they include significant new findings as well. Reviews will be published at the discretion of the editorial board; consult the editor-in-chief before submitting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书