{"title":"Acoustic Scene-Aware Processing and Auditory Model-Based Compensation Strategies.","authors":"Torsten Dau, Tobias May","doi":"10.1007/s10162-026-01043-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite significant advances in our understanding of human hearing and assistive hearing technologies, the benefits of hearing loss compensation continue to vary widely across individuals. A central challenge is the complexity and heterogeneity of hearing loss, whose perceptual consequences often extend far beyond reduced sensitivity. Conventional strategies rely on signal processing algorithms-such as spatial filtering, noise reduction, and dynamic range compression-to improve audibility and enhance target signals. These components are usually optimized in isolation, yet their combined effects may interfere with one another and therefore do not necessarily yield an overall benefit. More recently, machine learning techniques have been used to further improve the performance of individual components. To tailor compensation strategies to specific acoustic environments or listeners, various steering mechanisms have also been proposed, guided by acoustic cues, audiovisual input, or listener attention. While these approaches show promise, a consistent and objective computational target for optimization has yet to be established. As an alternative, auditory model-based strategies, increasingly combined with machine learning, have emerged. These approaches aim to minimize the discrepancy between simulated auditory representations of normal and impaired hearing, thereby providing a physiologically motivated optimization goal. Although both categories of strategies offer considerable potential, achieving effective compensation under real-time, real-world conditions remains a major challenge. This paper reviews opportunities and limitations of these approaches for individualized hearing aid compensation.</p>","PeriodicalId":56283,"journal":{"name":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":"495-511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13503992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-026-01043-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite significant advances in our understanding of human hearing and assistive hearing technologies, the benefits of hearing loss compensation continue to vary widely across individuals. A central challenge is the complexity and heterogeneity of hearing loss, whose perceptual consequences often extend far beyond reduced sensitivity. Conventional strategies rely on signal processing algorithms-such as spatial filtering, noise reduction, and dynamic range compression-to improve audibility and enhance target signals. These components are usually optimized in isolation, yet their combined effects may interfere with one another and therefore do not necessarily yield an overall benefit. More recently, machine learning techniques have been used to further improve the performance of individual components. To tailor compensation strategies to specific acoustic environments or listeners, various steering mechanisms have also been proposed, guided by acoustic cues, audiovisual input, or listener attention. While these approaches show promise, a consistent and objective computational target for optimization has yet to be established. As an alternative, auditory model-based strategies, increasingly combined with machine learning, have emerged. These approaches aim to minimize the discrepancy between simulated auditory representations of normal and impaired hearing, thereby providing a physiologically motivated optimization goal. Although both categories of strategies offer considerable potential, achieving effective compensation under real-time, real-world conditions remains a major challenge. This paper reviews opportunities and limitations of these approaches for individualized hearing aid compensation.
期刊介绍:
JARO is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to otolaryngology and communications sciences, including hearing, balance, speech and voice. JARO welcomes submissions describing experimental research that investigates the mechanisms underlying problems of basic and/or clinical significance.
Authors are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the kinds of papers carried by JARO by looking at past issues. Clinical case studies and pharmaceutical screens are not likely to be considered unless they reveal underlying mechanisms. Methods papers are not encouraged unless they include significant new findings as well. Reviews will be published at the discretion of the editorial board; consult the editor-in-chief before submitting.