Salivary gland ultrasonographic abnormalities in systemic lupus erythematosus versus rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative cross-sectional study using OMERACT scoring.
IF 1.4 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Adel Ibrahim Azzam, Mohamed Abada Abdelbary Elawa, Moustafa Ahmed Eldahan
{"title":"Salivary gland ultrasonographic abnormalities in systemic lupus erythematosus versus rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative cross-sectional study using OMERACT scoring.","authors":"Adel Ibrahim Azzam, Mohamed Abada Abdelbary Elawa, Moustafa Ahmed Eldahan","doi":"10.1007/s40477-026-01143-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the prevalence and patterns of salivary gland ultrasonographic (SGUS) abnormalities in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) using the OMERACT scoring system, and to investigate their associations with clinical manifestations, serological markers, and patient-reported dryness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study enrolled 70 patients (35 SLE fulfilling ACR/EULAR 2019 criteria; 35 RA fulfilling ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria) and 30 healthy controls. Primary outcome was SGUS positivity rate (OMERACT score ≥ 2 in any gland or ≥ 4 total). Secondary outcomes included individual gland grading, Power Doppler signals, and ESSPRI dryness burden. Participants underwent comprehensive assessment including disease activity scores (SLEDAI-2K for SLE, DAS28-ESR for RA), anti-Ro/anti-La antibodies, and bilateral salivary gland ultrasonography. Intra-observer reliability was assessed on 15% of scans (ICC = 0.89). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, disease duration, and CRP. Primary outcome significance was set at p < 0.05; secondary outcomes were interpreted with correction for multiple comparisons (Bonferroni-adjusted threshold, p < 0.007).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SLE patients were younger (33.08 ± 10.84 vs 43.82 ± 8.95 years, p = 0.001) with numerically shorter disease duration (6.72 ± 7.25 vs 10.58 ± 9.28 years, p = 0.056). Unadjusted SGUS positivity was similar (SLE 62.8% vs RA 57.1%, p = 0.62), both exceeding controls (13.3%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, disease duration, and CRP, the association remained non-significant (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 0.48-3.31, p = 0.64). Submandibular glands showed preferential involvement (Grade ≥ 1: left SMG 97.1% SLE, 85.7% RA). Power Doppler signals were more prevalent in SLE left SMG (77.1% vs 57.2%, p = 0.02), however this did not remain significant after correction for multiple comparisons. RA patients reported higher dryness scores (7.0 ± 1.83 vs 5.68 ± 1.92, p = 0.001) despite comparable structural findings. Anti-Ro/anti-La antibodies did not correlate with SGUS positivity in either group. SGUS showed no consistent correlation with disease activity measures and demonstrated moderate discriminative ability for ESSPRI-defined dryness ≥ 5 (AUC = 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SLE and RA patients exhibit comparable rates of salivary gland structural abnormalities independent of age, disease duration, and systemic inflammation. The discordance between ultrasonographic findings and patient-reported dryness, along with the lack of association with anti-Ro/anti-La antibodies, suggests heterogeneity in mechanisms of glandular involvement. SGUS provides objective assessment of glandular structure but should be interpreted alongside clinical evaluation and objective measures of gland function. Longitudinal studies incorporating objective salivary flow assessment are needed to clarify the clinical significance of ultrasonographic abnormalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-026-01143-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare the prevalence and patterns of salivary gland ultrasonographic (SGUS) abnormalities in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) using the OMERACT scoring system, and to investigate their associations with clinical manifestations, serological markers, and patient-reported dryness.
Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 70 patients (35 SLE fulfilling ACR/EULAR 2019 criteria; 35 RA fulfilling ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria) and 30 healthy controls. Primary outcome was SGUS positivity rate (OMERACT score ≥ 2 in any gland or ≥ 4 total). Secondary outcomes included individual gland grading, Power Doppler signals, and ESSPRI dryness burden. Participants underwent comprehensive assessment including disease activity scores (SLEDAI-2K for SLE, DAS28-ESR for RA), anti-Ro/anti-La antibodies, and bilateral salivary gland ultrasonography. Intra-observer reliability was assessed on 15% of scans (ICC = 0.89). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, disease duration, and CRP. Primary outcome significance was set at p < 0.05; secondary outcomes were interpreted with correction for multiple comparisons (Bonferroni-adjusted threshold, p < 0.007).
Results: SLE patients were younger (33.08 ± 10.84 vs 43.82 ± 8.95 years, p = 0.001) with numerically shorter disease duration (6.72 ± 7.25 vs 10.58 ± 9.28 years, p = 0.056). Unadjusted SGUS positivity was similar (SLE 62.8% vs RA 57.1%, p = 0.62), both exceeding controls (13.3%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, disease duration, and CRP, the association remained non-significant (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 0.48-3.31, p = 0.64). Submandibular glands showed preferential involvement (Grade ≥ 1: left SMG 97.1% SLE, 85.7% RA). Power Doppler signals were more prevalent in SLE left SMG (77.1% vs 57.2%, p = 0.02), however this did not remain significant after correction for multiple comparisons. RA patients reported higher dryness scores (7.0 ± 1.83 vs 5.68 ± 1.92, p = 0.001) despite comparable structural findings. Anti-Ro/anti-La antibodies did not correlate with SGUS positivity in either group. SGUS showed no consistent correlation with disease activity measures and demonstrated moderate discriminative ability for ESSPRI-defined dryness ≥ 5 (AUC = 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.87).
Conclusion: SLE and RA patients exhibit comparable rates of salivary gland structural abnormalities independent of age, disease duration, and systemic inflammation. The discordance between ultrasonographic findings and patient-reported dryness, along with the lack of association with anti-Ro/anti-La antibodies, suggests heterogeneity in mechanisms of glandular involvement. SGUS provides objective assessment of glandular structure but should be interpreted alongside clinical evaluation and objective measures of gland function. Longitudinal studies incorporating objective salivary flow assessment are needed to clarify the clinical significance of ultrasonographic abnormalities.
目的:利用OMERACT评分系统比较系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)和类风湿关节炎(RA)患者涎腺超声(SGUS)异常的患病率和类型,并探讨其与临床表现、血清学指标和患者报告的干燥的关系。方法:本横断面研究纳入70例患者(35例SLE满足ACR/EULAR 2019标准;35例RA满足ACR/EULAR 2010标准)和30例健康对照。主要终点为SGUS阳性率(任一腺体OMERACT评分≥2或总分≥4)。次要结果包括个体腺体分级、功率多普勒信号和ESSPRI干燥负荷。参与者接受了综合评估,包括疾病活动性评分(SLE的SLEDAI-2K, RA的DAS28-ESR),抗ro /抗la抗体和双侧唾腺超声检查。对15%的扫描(ICC = 0.89)评估了观察者内部的信度。多变量logistic回归校正了年龄、病程和CRP。结果:SLE患者较年轻(33.08±10.84 vs 43.82±8.95年,p = 0.001),病程较短(6.72±7.25 vs 10.58±9.28年,p = 0.056)。未经调整的SGUS阳性相似(SLE 62.8% vs RA 57.1%, p = 0.62),均超过对照组(13.3%,p)。结论:SLE和RA患者的唾液腺结构异常发生率相当,与年龄、病程和全身性炎症无关。超声检查结果与患者报告的干燥不一致,以及缺乏抗ro /抗la抗体的相关性,提示腺体受累机制存在异质性。SGUS提供了腺体结构的客观评估,但应与临床评估和腺体功能的客观测量一起解释。需要结合客观唾液流量评估的纵向研究来阐明超声异常的临床意义。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Ultrasound is the official journal of the Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB). The journal publishes original contributions (research and review articles, case reports, technical reports and letters to the editor) on significant advances in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and in cross-sectional diagnostic imaging. The official language of Journal of Ultrasound is English.