{"title":"Reliability and Validity of Ankle Muscle Strength Testing Using the ISOTIB Device.","authors":"Sean Drew, Sean A Horan, Steven Duhig","doi":"10.1002/jfa2.70098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>One repetition maximum (1RM) testing is recognised as a reliable and valid method for determining maximum muscle strength. However, there are limited reports in the literature for measuring maximum ankle strength using free-weight methods. The aim of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of a novel free-weight device (ISOTIB) used to measure ankle strength.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen healthy, recreationally active, adults (male = 10, female = 5, age = 29.7 ± 4.4 years) volunteered for the study, attending two sessions 1 week apart. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC<sub>(3,1)</sub>) and Bland-Altman method. Concurrent validity was examined by comparing 1RM ankle strength and normalised muscle activity using surface electromyography (sEMG) during dorsiflexion, inversion, and eversion movements performed with the ISOTIB device and an isokinetic dynamometer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ISOTIB exhibited excellent test-retest reliability for maximal dorsiflexion (ICC<sub>(3,1)</sub> = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.977-0.997), inversion (ICC<sub>(3,1)</sub> = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.970-0.997), and eversion (ICC<sub>(3,1)</sub> = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.920-0.991) strength. Concurrent validity was confirmed, with high positive correlations for maximal dorsiflexion (r = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.72-0.97) p < 0.001), inversion (r = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.24-0.88) p < 0.007), and eversion (r = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.64-0.96) p < 0.001) strength. sEMG results supported concurrent validity with comparable activity in the tibialis anterior, peroneus longus, and peroneus brevis muscles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ISOTIB demonstrated excellent reliability and validity, suggesting it is a viable tool for assessing maximal ankle strength. The ISOTIB offers a practical alternative to current methods, which are typically expensive and utilise large immovable devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":49164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","volume":"19 2","pages":"e70098"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13065896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70098","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: One repetition maximum (1RM) testing is recognised as a reliable and valid method for determining maximum muscle strength. However, there are limited reports in the literature for measuring maximum ankle strength using free-weight methods. The aim of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of a novel free-weight device (ISOTIB) used to measure ankle strength.
Methods: Fifteen healthy, recreationally active, adults (male = 10, female = 5, age = 29.7 ± 4.4 years) volunteered for the study, attending two sessions 1 week apart. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC(3,1)) and Bland-Altman method. Concurrent validity was examined by comparing 1RM ankle strength and normalised muscle activity using surface electromyography (sEMG) during dorsiflexion, inversion, and eversion movements performed with the ISOTIB device and an isokinetic dynamometer.
Results: The ISOTIB exhibited excellent test-retest reliability for maximal dorsiflexion (ICC(3,1) = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.977-0.997), inversion (ICC(3,1) = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.970-0.997), and eversion (ICC(3,1) = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.920-0.991) strength. Concurrent validity was confirmed, with high positive correlations for maximal dorsiflexion (r = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.72-0.97) p < 0.001), inversion (r = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.24-0.88) p < 0.007), and eversion (r = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.64-0.96) p < 0.001) strength. sEMG results supported concurrent validity with comparable activity in the tibialis anterior, peroneus longus, and peroneus brevis muscles.
Conclusion: The ISOTIB demonstrated excellent reliability and validity, suggesting it is a viable tool for assessing maximal ankle strength. The ISOTIB offers a practical alternative to current methods, which are typically expensive and utilise large immovable devices.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, the official journal of the Australian Podiatry Association and The College of Podiatry (UK), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders.
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research covers a wide range of clinical subject areas, including diabetology, paediatrics, sports medicine, gerontology and geriatrics, foot surgery, physical therapy, dermatology, wound management, radiology, biomechanics and bioengineering, orthotics and prosthetics, as well the broad areas of epidemiology, policy, organisation and delivery of services related to foot and ankle care.
The journal encourages submissions from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care.
The Australian Podiatry Association and the College of Podiatry (UK) have reserve funds to cover the article-processing charge for manuscripts submitted by its members. Society members can email the appropriate contact at Australian Podiatry Association or The College of Podiatry to obtain the corresponding code to enter on submission.