Healthcare Professionals' Attitudes and Perspectives on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in an Academic Culture: A Freelisting Study.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Vivek A Ashok, Lakeisha Mulugeta-Gordon, Jasmine Hwang, Weilu Song, Melissa Montoya, Luis E Seija, Omaris Caceres, Shimrit Keddem
{"title":"Healthcare Professionals' Attitudes and Perspectives on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in an Academic Culture: A Freelisting Study.","authors":"Vivek A Ashok, Lakeisha Mulugeta-Gordon, Jasmine Hwang, Weilu Song, Melissa Montoya, Luis E Seija, Omaris Caceres, Shimrit Keddem","doi":"10.1177/23821205261433426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Successful implementation of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives requires understanding the perspectives of diverse student populations. This study explored how graduate health and public health professionals perceive DEI and their implementation barriers and facilitators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative freelisting study was conducted from June to August 2024 at a single urban academic institution in Pennsylvania. Eligible participants were current or recent graduate students in health or public health programs. Participants engaged in structured freelisting exercises, where they listed words, themes, and reflections related to 5 different DEI domains. Responses were coded by multiple researchers, and the Smith Salience Index was applied to quantify the importance of themes across participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty participants completed the study. The most salient themes were \"inclusivity and representation\" and \"diverse and receptive leadership\" as essential components of DEI. Participants expressed both positive and negative experiences. White and man-identifying participants more often emphasized positive aspects, while older, woman-identifying, and participants from racial and ethnic minority backgrounds highlighted the need for institutional \"commitment, accountability, and buy-in.\" The most frequently cited barrier to DEI was \"lack of adequate funding and resources.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Graduate health and public health professionals emphasized the importance of representation and leadership diversity in fostering inclusive environments. Institutional investment in DEI-particularly through recruitment, retention, leadership representation, and sustained funding-is critical to cultivating a workforce prepared to advance health equity for the communities they serve. Differences in perceptions by race, gender, and age underscore the need for tailored approaches to DEI implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"13 ","pages":"23821205261433426"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13058191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205261433426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Successful implementation of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives requires understanding the perspectives of diverse student populations. This study explored how graduate health and public health professionals perceive DEI and their implementation barriers and facilitators.

Methods: This qualitative freelisting study was conducted from June to August 2024 at a single urban academic institution in Pennsylvania. Eligible participants were current or recent graduate students in health or public health programs. Participants engaged in structured freelisting exercises, where they listed words, themes, and reflections related to 5 different DEI domains. Responses were coded by multiple researchers, and the Smith Salience Index was applied to quantify the importance of themes across participants.

Results: Thirty participants completed the study. The most salient themes were "inclusivity and representation" and "diverse and receptive leadership" as essential components of DEI. Participants expressed both positive and negative experiences. White and man-identifying participants more often emphasized positive aspects, while older, woman-identifying, and participants from racial and ethnic minority backgrounds highlighted the need for institutional "commitment, accountability, and buy-in." The most frequently cited barrier to DEI was "lack of adequate funding and resources."

Conclusion: Graduate health and public health professionals emphasized the importance of representation and leadership diversity in fostering inclusive environments. Institutional investment in DEI-particularly through recruitment, retention, leadership representation, and sustained funding-is critical to cultivating a workforce prepared to advance health equity for the communities they serve. Differences in perceptions by race, gender, and age underscore the need for tailored approaches to DEI implementation.

学术文化中医疗保健专业人员对多样性、公平和包容的态度和观点:一项自由列表研究。
目标:成功实施多元化、公平和包容(DEI)计划需要了解不同学生群体的观点。本研究探讨了研究生卫生和公共卫生专业人员如何看待DEI及其实施障碍和促进因素。方法:本定性自由列表研究于2024年6月至8月在宾夕法尼亚州的一所城市学术机构进行。符合条件的参与者是健康或公共健康项目的在读或刚毕业的研究生。参与者进行了结构化的自由列表练习,在那里他们列出了与5个不同的DEI领域相关的单词、主题和思考。回答由多位研究人员编码,并应用史密斯显著性指数来量化主题在参与者中的重要性。结果:30名参与者完成了研究。最突出的主题是“包容性和代表性”和“多样化和接受性领导”,这是DEI的基本组成部分。参与者表达了积极和消极的经历。白人和男性参与者更多地强调积极的方面,而年龄较大、女性和来自种族和少数民族背景的参与者则强调机构“承诺、责任和支持”的必要性。最常被提及的DEI障碍是“缺乏足够的资金和资源”。结论:研究生卫生和公共卫生专业人员强调了代表性和领导多样性在培养包容性环境中的重要性。对dei的机构投资——特别是通过招聘、保留、领导代表和持续的资助——对于培养一支准备好为他们所服务的社区促进卫生公平的劳动力至关重要。种族、性别和年龄观念的差异强调了为实施DEI量身定制方法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书