Co-Creating Preconception Health Content for a Digital Resource for Women From Diverse Ethnic Backgrounds.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Asvini K Subasinghe, Sanduni Madawala, Dinali Fernando, Jue Xie, Jessica Watterson, Ling Wu, Chris Prawira, Patrick Olivier, Jacqueline A Boyle
{"title":"Co-Creating Preconception Health Content for a Digital Resource for Women From Diverse Ethnic Backgrounds.","authors":"Asvini K Subasinghe, Sanduni Madawala, Dinali Fernando, Jue Xie, Jessica Watterson, Ling Wu, Chris Prawira, Patrick Olivier, Jacqueline A Boyle","doi":"10.1111/hex.70542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Planning pregnancy and optimal health prior to pregnancy can significantly reduce pregnancy complications and poor maternal health outcomes. Women from culturally and racially marginalised groups experience more unintended pregnancies, increased preconception risk factors and adverse pregnancy outcomes, including maternal and infant mortality, compared to native born Australians. Improving health literacy through culturally relevant and accessible resources may improve preconception health. We have previously shown that women from migrant and refugee backgrounds would prefer receiving preconception information on digital platforms. The aim of this study is to understand the focus and concerns of the women with regard to the content for a digital resource called 'BabyReady?'.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted virtual workshops with 10 women from East Asian, South Asian, Central Asian, Middle-Eastern, and African backgrounds to understand more about cultural practices related to pregnancy preparation, preconception information sources and to identify topics that may be useful to include on a digital dashboard. Focus group discussions were transcribed and a content analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A range of culturally specific practices included eating warm foods, using acupuncture and alternative medicines to prepare for pregnancy. Expectations from family and friends induced high levels of stress and feeling controlled. Relatives were integral in decision making about pregnancy planning, particularly the mother-in-law. Women wanted to learn more about egg freezing, government benefits, adverse birth outcomes, how to navigate the healthcare system, interpreter services and where they could locate female health professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital preconception health content may be optimised for use by women from ethnically diverse backgrounds if it includes information around stress management, how to balance cultural expectations and beliefs with health advice, how to locate female health practitioners who speak their language and appropriate pregnancy planning.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>The public participated in workshops providing feedback on what digital culturally responsive preconception health content means to them and how best to integrate it into a digital health dashboard.</p>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"29 2","pages":"e70542"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13066709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70542","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Planning pregnancy and optimal health prior to pregnancy can significantly reduce pregnancy complications and poor maternal health outcomes. Women from culturally and racially marginalised groups experience more unintended pregnancies, increased preconception risk factors and adverse pregnancy outcomes, including maternal and infant mortality, compared to native born Australians. Improving health literacy through culturally relevant and accessible resources may improve preconception health. We have previously shown that women from migrant and refugee backgrounds would prefer receiving preconception information on digital platforms. The aim of this study is to understand the focus and concerns of the women with regard to the content for a digital resource called 'BabyReady?'.

Methods: We conducted virtual workshops with 10 women from East Asian, South Asian, Central Asian, Middle-Eastern, and African backgrounds to understand more about cultural practices related to pregnancy preparation, preconception information sources and to identify topics that may be useful to include on a digital dashboard. Focus group discussions were transcribed and a content analysis was conducted.

Results: A range of culturally specific practices included eating warm foods, using acupuncture and alternative medicines to prepare for pregnancy. Expectations from family and friends induced high levels of stress and feeling controlled. Relatives were integral in decision making about pregnancy planning, particularly the mother-in-law. Women wanted to learn more about egg freezing, government benefits, adverse birth outcomes, how to navigate the healthcare system, interpreter services and where they could locate female health professionals.

Conclusion: Digital preconception health content may be optimised for use by women from ethnically diverse backgrounds if it includes information around stress management, how to balance cultural expectations and beliefs with health advice, how to locate female health practitioners who speak their language and appropriate pregnancy planning.

Patient or public contribution: The public participated in workshops providing feedback on what digital culturally responsive preconception health content means to them and how best to integrate it into a digital health dashboard.

为来自不同种族背景的妇女共同创建一个数字资源的孕前健康内容。
导言:孕前计划妊娠和最佳健康可显著减少妊娠并发症和不良孕产妇健康结局。与本土出生的澳大利亚人相比,来自文化和种族边缘群体的女性经历了更多的意外怀孕,增加了孕前风险因素和不良妊娠结果,包括孕产妇和婴儿死亡率。通过与文化相关和可获得的资源来提高卫生知识素养,可以改善孕前健康。我们之前的研究表明,来自移民和难民背景的女性更愿意在数字平台上接收先入为主的信息。这项研究的目的是了解女性对一个名为“BabyReady?”的数字资源内容的关注和关注。方法:我们与来自东亚、南亚、中亚、中东和非洲背景的10名妇女进行了虚拟研讨会,以了解更多与怀孕准备、孕前信息来源相关的文化习俗,并确定可能有用的主题,包括在数字仪表板上。记录焦点小组讨论并进行内容分析。结果:一系列文化特定的做法包括吃热的食物,使用针灸和替代药物来准备怀孕。来自家人和朋友的期望导致了高度的压力和控制感。亲戚在怀孕计划的决策中是不可或缺的,尤其是岳母。妇女们想了解更多关于卵子冷冻、政府福利、不良分娩结果、如何在医疗保健系统中导航、翻译服务以及在哪里可以找到女性卫生专业人员。结论:如果数字孕前健康内容包括有关压力管理、如何平衡文化期望和信仰与健康建议、如何找到说他们语言的女性健康从业人员以及适当的怀孕计划等方面的信息,则可以优化来自不同种族背景的妇女使用的数字孕前健康内容。患者或公众贡献:公众参加了讲习班,提供反馈,说明数字文化敏感的先入为主的健康内容对他们意味着什么,以及如何最好地将其纳入数字健康仪表板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书