Monica E Swilley-Martinez, Brian W Pence, Kate Vinita Fitch, Vanessa E Miller, Matthew M Turnure, Pasangi S Perera, Timothy S Carey, Shabbar I Ranapurwala
{"title":"County-level social determinants of health and suicide mortality trends among formerly incarcerated persons in North Carolina, 2010-2018.","authors":"Monica E Swilley-Martinez, Brian W Pence, Kate Vinita Fitch, Vanessa E Miller, Matthew M Turnure, Pasangi S Perera, Timothy S Carey, Shabbar I Ranapurwala","doi":"10.1186/s40352-026-00409-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Suicide mortality represents a growing public health crisis in the United States, disproportionately affecting people with recent incarceration histories. The purpose of this study was to assess how county-level Social Determinants of Health—including educational attainment, unemployment, poverty, aging, racial composition, and rurality—are associated with suicide mortality among formerly incarcerated individuals in North Carolina in order to develop geographically focused, socially responsive suicide prevention resources. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of people released from North Carolina prisons between 2010 and 2018 and compared suicide mortality with that of the North Carolina general population aged 18–69 years. Using linked administrative data, we calculated age-, sex-, and year-standardized suicide mortality rates and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) by county-level social determinants of health, including educational attainment, unemployment, poverty, aging, racial composition, and rurality. RESULTS: Suicide mortality among formerly incarcerated individuals was consistently higher than in the general population, with the greatest disparities in counties that are urban (SMR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.50, 2.58), have below average educational attainment (SMR: 2.53, 95% CI: 1.69,3.37), below average unemployment (SMR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.66, 3.01), low poverty (SMR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.56, 2.70), below-average racial diversity (SMR: 3.12, 95% CI: 2.20, 4.04), or an above-average proportion of older adults (SMR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.22, 3.57). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that suicide mortality disparities between formerly incarcerated individuals and the general population are greatest in more advantaged counties, where community-level protective factors appear to benefit the general population but do not extend to those returning from prison. Addressing these disparities will require investments in place-based mental health infrastructure and reentry support tailored to local community contexts. </p>","PeriodicalId":37843,"journal":{"name":"Health and Justice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13134224/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-026-00409-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Suicide mortality represents a growing public health crisis in the United States, disproportionately affecting people with recent incarceration histories. The purpose of this study was to assess how county-level Social Determinants of Health—including educational attainment, unemployment, poverty, aging, racial composition, and rurality—are associated with suicide mortality among formerly incarcerated individuals in North Carolina in order to develop geographically focused, socially responsive suicide prevention resources. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of people released from North Carolina prisons between 2010 and 2018 and compared suicide mortality with that of the North Carolina general population aged 18–69 years. Using linked administrative data, we calculated age-, sex-, and year-standardized suicide mortality rates and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) by county-level social determinants of health, including educational attainment, unemployment, poverty, aging, racial composition, and rurality. RESULTS: Suicide mortality among formerly incarcerated individuals was consistently higher than in the general population, with the greatest disparities in counties that are urban (SMR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.50, 2.58), have below average educational attainment (SMR: 2.53, 95% CI: 1.69,3.37), below average unemployment (SMR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.66, 3.01), low poverty (SMR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.56, 2.70), below-average racial diversity (SMR: 3.12, 95% CI: 2.20, 4.04), or an above-average proportion of older adults (SMR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.22, 3.57). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that suicide mortality disparities between formerly incarcerated individuals and the general population are greatest in more advantaged counties, where community-level protective factors appear to benefit the general population but do not extend to those returning from prison. Addressing these disparities will require investments in place-based mental health infrastructure and reentry support tailored to local community contexts.
期刊介绍:
Health & Justice is open to submissions from public health, criminology and criminal justice, medical science, psychology and clinical sciences, sociology, neuroscience, biology, anthropology and the social sciences, and covers a broad array of research types. It publishes original research, research notes (promising issues that are smaller in scope), commentaries, and translational notes (possible ways of introducing innovations in the justice system). Health & Justice aims to: Present original experimental research on the area of health and well-being of people involved in the adult or juvenile justice system, including people who work in the system; Present meta-analysis or systematic reviews in the area of health and justice for those involved in the justice system; Provide an arena to present new and upcoming scientific issues; Present translational science—the movement of scientific findings into practice including programs, procedures, or strategies; Present implementation science findings to advance the uptake and use of evidence-based practices; and, Present protocols and clinical practice guidelines. As an open access journal, Health & Justice aims for a broad reach, including researchers across many disciplines as well as justice practitioners (e.g. judges, prosecutors, defenders, probation officers, treatment providers, mental health and medical personnel working with justice-involved individuals, etc.). The sections of the journal devoted to translational and implementation sciences are primarily geared to practitioners and justice actors with special attention to the techniques used.