Variation in clinical educators' understanding of being an expert clinical educator: a phenomenographic study.

IF 3.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Gretel Evans, Jacqueline Raymond, Kate Thomson, Merrolee Penman
{"title":"Variation in clinical educators' understanding of being an expert clinical educator: a phenomenographic study.","authors":"Gretel Evans, Jacqueline Raymond, Kate Thomson, Merrolee Penman","doi":"10.1007/s10459-026-10535-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Being a clinical educator in real-practice settings is an important role adopted by many allied heath clinicians, enabling pre-qualifying students to develop the professional capabilities and work-readiness needed for practice. Although there are some characteristics and impacts associated with what clinical educator expertise looks like, developmental trajectories of clinical educators and what it takes to develop this expertise are unknown. Using a phenomenographic approach, we investigated the qualitatively different ways that allied health clinical educators understand what being an expert clinical educator means. We interviewed a diverse sample of clinical educators and analysed their critically different ways of understanding and the relationships between these ways of understanding. Eighteen clinical educators participated, representing 7 allied health disciplines. Four distinct ways of understanding ‘being an expert clinical educator’ were constituted. These were: (i) Teaching professional skills; (ii) Managing learning activity; (iii) Facilitating learning responsively; and (iv) Partnering with learners. These ways of understanding are differentiated by varying levels of awareness of 16 dimensions of what it means to be an expert clinical educator, which were arranged into four thematic groupings: (i) Role of the clinical educator; (ii) Understanding of students; (iii) Understanding of how students learn and (iv) Desired outcomes. These findings offer unique knowledge about how clinical educators understand what it means to be an expert clinical educator, and highlights how some understandings are limited in complexity. This knowledge is valuable for shaping the design of educator learning programs, policy frameworks and the recognition of clinical educator capabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-026-10535-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Being a clinical educator in real-practice settings is an important role adopted by many allied heath clinicians, enabling pre-qualifying students to develop the professional capabilities and work-readiness needed for practice. Although there are some characteristics and impacts associated with what clinical educator expertise looks like, developmental trajectories of clinical educators and what it takes to develop this expertise are unknown. Using a phenomenographic approach, we investigated the qualitatively different ways that allied health clinical educators understand what being an expert clinical educator means. We interviewed a diverse sample of clinical educators and analysed their critically different ways of understanding and the relationships between these ways of understanding. Eighteen clinical educators participated, representing 7 allied health disciplines. Four distinct ways of understanding ‘being an expert clinical educator’ were constituted. These were: (i) Teaching professional skills; (ii) Managing learning activity; (iii) Facilitating learning responsively; and (iv) Partnering with learners. These ways of understanding are differentiated by varying levels of awareness of 16 dimensions of what it means to be an expert clinical educator, which were arranged into four thematic groupings: (i) Role of the clinical educator; (ii) Understanding of students; (iii) Understanding of how students learn and (iv) Desired outcomes. These findings offer unique knowledge about how clinical educators understand what it means to be an expert clinical educator, and highlights how some understandings are limited in complexity. This knowledge is valuable for shaping the design of educator learning programs, policy frameworks and the recognition of clinical educator capabilities.

临床教育工作者对专业临床教育工作者理解的差异:一项现象研究。
作为一名临床教育工作者,在实际的实践环境中是许多联合健康临床医生所采用的重要角色,使资格预审的学生能够发展实践所需的专业能力和工作准备。尽管有一些特征和影响与临床教育工作者的专业知识有关,但临床教育工作者的发展轨迹以及发展这种专业知识所需的条件是未知的。使用现象学的方法,我们调查了定性不同的方式,专职卫生临床教育工作者理解什么是专家临床教育意味着什么。我们采访了临床教育工作者的不同样本,并分析了他们截然不同的理解方式以及这些理解方式之间的关系。18名临床教育工作者参加了会议,他们代表了7个相关的卫生学科。对“成为临床教育专家”有四种不同的理解方式。这些是:(i)教授专业技能;管理学习活动;积极促进学习;(四)与学习者合作。这些理解方式是通过对16个维度的不同程度的认识来区分的,这些维度是什么意味着成为一名专业的临床教育工作者,这些维度被分为四个主题组:(i)临床教育工作者的角色;(二)对学生的理解;(iii)理解学生如何学习和(iv)期望的结果。这些发现提供了关于临床教育工作者如何理解成为一名专业临床教育工作者意味着什么的独特知识,并强调了一些理解在复杂性上是有限的。这些知识对于塑造教育工作者学习计划的设计、政策框架和临床教育工作者能力的认可是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书