"Will I Still be Myself?" Opposition to Xenotransplantation Among Chinese Kidney Transplant Candidates: A Qualitative Study.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Wenhao Tang, Jiaxing Zhou, Shangping Zhao, XiaoQing Li, XiaoQing Chen, Yingli Yang, Chunmei Wang, Bo Gu, Qiling Tan
{"title":"\"Will I Still be Myself?\" Opposition to Xenotransplantation Among Chinese Kidney Transplant Candidates: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Wenhao Tang, Jiaxing Zhou, Shangping Zhao, XiaoQing Li, XiaoQing Chen, Yingli Yang, Chunmei Wang, Bo Gu, Qiling Tan","doi":"10.1111/xen.70127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kidney transplantation remains the preferred treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD), yet its application is constrained by a persistent shortage of donor organs. Xenotransplantation has emerged as a promising alternative, but its clinical adoption faces complex ethical, cultural, and psychological barriers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a phenomenological approach, we conducted semi-structured face-to-face interviews with 18 kidney transplant candidates who opposed xenotransplantation at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between June and August 2025. Data were analyzed inductively using NVivo software in conjunction with Colaizzi's seven-step method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four interrelated themes captured the key barriers to acceptance: (1) Anxiety about physical self-identity and social pressure-fears of losing bodily integrity or facing stigma; (2) Concerns about medical safety-perceived risks of rejection, infection, and technological uncertainty; (3) Information barriers and decision-making dilemmas-fragmented information and lack of professional guidance; and (4) Lack of trust and security mechanisms-mistrust in both the technology and institutional safeguards.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The acceptance of xenotransplantation among Chinese kidney transplant candidates who oppose xenotransplantation is hindered by multidimensional, interlinked factors involving identity, safety, knowledge, and trust. Addressing these specific barriers through targeted transparent education, ethical governance, and institutional trust-building strategies is essential for the responsible clinical integration of xenotransplantation and also provides a reference for communicating with skeptical candidates in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23866,"journal":{"name":"Xenotransplantation","volume":"33 2","pages":"e70127"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Xenotransplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/xen.70127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Kidney transplantation remains the preferred treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD), yet its application is constrained by a persistent shortage of donor organs. Xenotransplantation has emerged as a promising alternative, but its clinical adoption faces complex ethical, cultural, and psychological barriers.

Methods: Using a phenomenological approach, we conducted semi-structured face-to-face interviews with 18 kidney transplant candidates who opposed xenotransplantation at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between June and August 2025. Data were analyzed inductively using NVivo software in conjunction with Colaizzi's seven-step method.

Results: Four interrelated themes captured the key barriers to acceptance: (1) Anxiety about physical self-identity and social pressure-fears of losing bodily integrity or facing stigma; (2) Concerns about medical safety-perceived risks of rejection, infection, and technological uncertainty; (3) Information barriers and decision-making dilemmas-fragmented information and lack of professional guidance; and (4) Lack of trust and security mechanisms-mistrust in both the technology and institutional safeguards.

Conclusions: The acceptance of xenotransplantation among Chinese kidney transplant candidates who oppose xenotransplantation is hindered by multidimensional, interlinked factors involving identity, safety, knowledge, and trust. Addressing these specific barriers through targeted transparent education, ethical governance, and institutional trust-building strategies is essential for the responsible clinical integration of xenotransplantation and also provides a reference for communicating with skeptical candidates in clinical practice.

“我还是我自己吗?”中国肾移植候选人对异种移植的反对:一项定性研究。
背景:肾移植仍然是终末期肾病(ESRD)的首选治疗方法,但其应用受到供体器官持续短缺的限制。异种器官移植已成为一种很有前途的替代方法,但其临床应用面临着复杂的伦理、文化和心理障碍。方法:采用现象学方法,对2025年6月至8月四川大学华西医院18名反对异种移植的肾移植候选人进行半结构化面对面访谈。使用NVivo软件结合Colaizzi的七步法对数据进行归纳分析。结果:四个相互关联的主题抓住了接受的主要障碍:(1)对身体自我认同和社会压力的焦虑-失去身体完整性或面临耻辱的恐惧;(2)对医疗安全的担忧——排斥、感染和技术不确定性的感知风险;(3)信息障碍和决策困境——信息碎片化,缺乏专业指导;(4)缺乏信任和安全机制——对技术和制度保障的不信任。结论:反对异种移植的中国肾移植候选人接受异种移植受到身份、安全、知识和信任等多方面相互关联的因素的阻碍。通过有针对性的透明教育、伦理治理和机构信任建立策略来解决这些具体障碍,对于负责任的异种移植临床整合至关重要,也为在临床实践中与持怀疑态度的候选人沟通提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Xenotransplantation
Xenotransplantation 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Xenotransplantation provides its readership with rapid communication of new findings in the field of organ and tissue transplantation across species barriers.The journal is not only of interest to those whose primary area is xenotransplantation, but also to veterinarians, microbiologists and geneticists. It also investigates and reports on the controversial theological, ethical, legal and psychological implications of xenotransplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书