Daniela Silva Canella, Patricia Gálvez Espinoza, Ana Beatriz Coelho De Azevedo, Larissa Loures Mendes
{"title":"Purchases and prices of unprocessed or minimally processed foods according to food outlets and income in Brazil.","authors":"Daniela Silva Canella, Patricia Gálvez Espinoza, Ana Beatriz Coelho De Azevedo, Larissa Loures Mendes","doi":"10.1017/S1368980026102481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the purchases and prices of unprocessed or minimally processed foods according to the type of food outlet and household income.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study conducted with data from the 2017-2018 Brazilian Household Budget Survey. Food acquisition and income were the variables of interest. Unprocessed or minimally processed foods were identified according to the NOVA classification, and the shares of energy (kcal) and quantity (grams), as well as prices paid, were analysed. Food outlets were grouped into nine types. Household income per person was assessed in quintiles (Q). Descriptive analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Brazil.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A nationally representative sample of 57 920 households.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The amount of unprocessed or minimally processed foods acquired varied from 320 g (Q1 of income) to 493 g (Q5). The increase in income had a positive effect on the share of foods purchased in supermarkets (Q1: 27·6 % v. Q5: 63·8 %) and fruit and vegetable retailers (Q1: 1·5 % v. Q4: 4·6 %). In contrast, an inverse relation was observed for Mini-markets (Q1: 34·9 % v. Q5: 16·2 %), butchers (Q1: 6·8 % v. Q5: 2·3 %), street markets (Q1: 13·3 % v. Q5: 3·8 %) and street food vendors (Q1: 5·3 % v. Q5: 1·0 %). The price paid for unprocessed or minimally processed foods in supermarkets, mini-markets, butchers and street markets was positively associated with income, which means that a higher mean price was observed in the highest income quintile.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The availability and affordability of unprocessed or minimally processed foods differed according to food outlets and were influenced by income level.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"e100"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980026102481","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess the purchases and prices of unprocessed or minimally processed foods according to the type of food outlet and household income.
Design: Cross-sectional study conducted with data from the 2017-2018 Brazilian Household Budget Survey. Food acquisition and income were the variables of interest. Unprocessed or minimally processed foods were identified according to the NOVA classification, and the shares of energy (kcal) and quantity (grams), as well as prices paid, were analysed. Food outlets were grouped into nine types. Household income per person was assessed in quintiles (Q). Descriptive analyses were conducted.
Setting: Brazil.
Participants: A nationally representative sample of 57 920 households.
Results: The amount of unprocessed or minimally processed foods acquired varied from 320 g (Q1 of income) to 493 g (Q5). The increase in income had a positive effect on the share of foods purchased in supermarkets (Q1: 27·6 % v. Q5: 63·8 %) and fruit and vegetable retailers (Q1: 1·5 % v. Q4: 4·6 %). In contrast, an inverse relation was observed for Mini-markets (Q1: 34·9 % v. Q5: 16·2 %), butchers (Q1: 6·8 % v. Q5: 2·3 %), street markets (Q1: 13·3 % v. Q5: 3·8 %) and street food vendors (Q1: 5·3 % v. Q5: 1·0 %). The price paid for unprocessed or minimally processed foods in supermarkets, mini-markets, butchers and street markets was positively associated with income, which means that a higher mean price was observed in the highest income quintile.
Conclusions: The availability and affordability of unprocessed or minimally processed foods differed according to food outlets and were influenced by income level.
期刊介绍:
Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.