Purchases and prices of unprocessed or minimally processed foods according to food outlets and income in Brazil.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Daniela Silva Canella, Patricia Gálvez Espinoza, Ana Beatriz Coelho De Azevedo, Larissa Loures Mendes
{"title":"Purchases and prices of unprocessed or minimally processed foods according to food outlets and income in Brazil.","authors":"Daniela Silva Canella, Patricia Gálvez Espinoza, Ana Beatriz Coelho De Azevedo, Larissa Loures Mendes","doi":"10.1017/S1368980026102481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the purchases and prices of unprocessed or minimally processed foods according to the type of food outlet and household income.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study conducted with data from the 2017-2018 Brazilian Household Budget Survey. Food acquisition and income were the variables of interest. Unprocessed or minimally processed foods were identified according to the NOVA classification, and the shares of energy (kcal) and quantity (grams), as well as prices paid, were analysed. Food outlets were grouped into nine types. Household income per person was assessed in quintiles (Q). Descriptive analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Brazil.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A nationally representative sample of 57 920 households.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The amount of unprocessed or minimally processed foods acquired varied from 320 g (Q1 of income) to 493 g (Q5). The increase in income had a positive effect on the share of foods purchased in supermarkets (Q1: 27·6 % v. Q5: 63·8 %) and fruit and vegetable retailers (Q1: 1·5 % v. Q4: 4·6 %). In contrast, an inverse relation was observed for Mini-markets (Q1: 34·9 % v. Q5: 16·2 %), butchers (Q1: 6·8 % v. Q5: 2·3 %), street markets (Q1: 13·3 % v. Q5: 3·8 %) and street food vendors (Q1: 5·3 % v. Q5: 1·0 %). The price paid for unprocessed or minimally processed foods in supermarkets, mini-markets, butchers and street markets was positively associated with income, which means that a higher mean price was observed in the highest income quintile.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The availability and affordability of unprocessed or minimally processed foods differed according to food outlets and were influenced by income level.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"e100"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980026102481","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the purchases and prices of unprocessed or minimally processed foods according to the type of food outlet and household income.

Design: Cross-sectional study conducted with data from the 2017-2018 Brazilian Household Budget Survey. Food acquisition and income were the variables of interest. Unprocessed or minimally processed foods were identified according to the NOVA classification, and the shares of energy (kcal) and quantity (grams), as well as prices paid, were analysed. Food outlets were grouped into nine types. Household income per person was assessed in quintiles (Q). Descriptive analyses were conducted.

Setting: Brazil.

Participants: A nationally representative sample of 57 920 households.

Results: The amount of unprocessed or minimally processed foods acquired varied from 320 g (Q1 of income) to 493 g (Q5). The increase in income had a positive effect on the share of foods purchased in supermarkets (Q1: 27·6 % v. Q5: 63·8 %) and fruit and vegetable retailers (Q1: 1·5 % v. Q4: 4·6 %). In contrast, an inverse relation was observed for Mini-markets (Q1: 34·9 % v. Q5: 16·2 %), butchers (Q1: 6·8 % v. Q5: 2·3 %), street markets (Q1: 13·3 % v. Q5: 3·8 %) and street food vendors (Q1: 5·3 % v. Q5: 1·0 %). The price paid for unprocessed or minimally processed foods in supermarkets, mini-markets, butchers and street markets was positively associated with income, which means that a higher mean price was observed in the highest income quintile.

Conclusions: The availability and affordability of unprocessed or minimally processed foods differed according to food outlets and were influenced by income level.

巴西按食品销售点和收入分列的未加工或最低加工食品的购买量和价格。
目的:根据食品出口类型和家庭收入,评估未加工或最低加工食品的购买情况和价格。设计:采用2017-18年巴西家庭预算调查数据进行的横断面研究。食物获取和收入是兴趣变量。根据NOVA分类确定了未加工或最低加工的食品,并分析了能量(千卡)和数量(克)的份额以及支付的价格。食品店被分为九类。人均家庭收入以五分位数(Q)进行评估。进行描述性分析。设置:巴西。参与者:57,920个家庭的全国代表性样本。结果:获得的未加工或最少加工食品的数量从320克(收入的Q1)到493克(收入的Q1)不等。收入的增加对在超市(第一季度:27.6%,第五季度:63.8%)和水果和蔬菜零售商(第一季度:1.5%,第四季度:4.6%)购买的食品份额产生了积极影响。相比之下,迷你市场(第一季度:34.9%,第5季度:16.2%)、肉店(第一季度:6.8%,第5季度:2.3%)、街头市场(第一季度:13.3%,第5季度:3.8%)和街头食品摊贩(第一季度:5.3%,第5季度:1.0%)的比例呈反比关系。在超市、迷你市场、肉店和街头市场购买未加工或最低加工食品的价格与收入呈正相关,这意味着在收入最高的五分之一人群中,平均价格较高。结论:不同食品渠道对未加工食品和最低加工食品的可得性和可负担性存在差异,并受收入水平的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Nutrition
Public Health Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
521
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书