Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Disease in a Developing Country-A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Lina Hammoud, Rana Zareef, Jad Abdul Khalek, Elsie Touma, Rola Ali, Fadi Bitar, Mariam Arabi
{"title":"Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Disease in a Developing Country-A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Lina Hammoud, Rana Zareef, Jad Abdul Khalek, Elsie Touma, Rola Ali, Fadi Bitar, Mariam Arabi","doi":"10.1002/pd.70144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease (CHD) remains suboptimal in resource-limited settings. We quantified prenatal CHD detection, fetal echocardiography utilization, and predictors of counseling for fetal echocardiography in future pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We surveyed parents of children with CHD, capturing key sociodemographics, obstetric history, prenatal screening, use of fetal echocardiography, and future counseling. We compared prenatal versus postnatal diagnoses and used multivariable logistic regression to identify counseling predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 362 families, only 48 children (13.3%) were diagnosed prenatally, despite nearly universal obstetric follow-up (99.7%) and moderate prenatal ultrasound screening (59.4%). Prenatal ultrasound screening was more frequent among prenatally diagnosed cases (97.9% vs. 53.5%; p < 0.001). Fetal echocardiography was more common when extracardiac malformations were suspected and in moderate-to-complex CHD (p < 0.001). Only 113/362 (31.2%) of families reported receiving counseling for future pregnancies. In multivariable analysis, greater CHD complexity was independently associated with counseling (OR 3.21; p < 0.001), whereas family history of CHD was not (p = 0.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prenatal CHD detection was uncommon and driven by screening practices. Counseling regarding fetal echocardiography was inconsistently delivered and concentrated on complex CHD. These findings highlight gaps in referral and counseling, supporting the need for stronger integration between obstetric and pediatric cardiology services.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.70144","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease (CHD) remains suboptimal in resource-limited settings. We quantified prenatal CHD detection, fetal echocardiography utilization, and predictors of counseling for fetal echocardiography in future pregnancies.

Method: We surveyed parents of children with CHD, capturing key sociodemographics, obstetric history, prenatal screening, use of fetal echocardiography, and future counseling. We compared prenatal versus postnatal diagnoses and used multivariable logistic regression to identify counseling predictors.

Results: Among 362 families, only 48 children (13.3%) were diagnosed prenatally, despite nearly universal obstetric follow-up (99.7%) and moderate prenatal ultrasound screening (59.4%). Prenatal ultrasound screening was more frequent among prenatally diagnosed cases (97.9% vs. 53.5%; p < 0.001). Fetal echocardiography was more common when extracardiac malformations were suspected and in moderate-to-complex CHD (p < 0.001). Only 113/362 (31.2%) of families reported receiving counseling for future pregnancies. In multivariable analysis, greater CHD complexity was independently associated with counseling (OR 3.21; p < 0.001), whereas family history of CHD was not (p = 0.91).

Conclusions: Prenatal CHD detection was uncommon and driven by screening practices. Counseling regarding fetal echocardiography was inconsistently delivered and concentrated on complex CHD. These findings highlight gaps in referral and counseling, supporting the need for stronger integration between obstetric and pediatric cardiology services.

发展中国家先天性心脏病的产前诊断——横断面研究
目的:在资源有限的情况下,先天性心脏病(CHD)的产前检测仍然不理想。我们量化了产前冠心病检测,胎儿超声心动图的使用,以及未来妊娠胎儿超声心动图咨询的预测因素。方法:我们调查了CHD患儿的父母,包括关键的社会人口统计学、产科史、产前筛查、胎儿超声心动图的使用以及未来的咨询。我们比较了产前和产后诊断,并使用多变量逻辑回归来确定咨询预测因子。结果:在362个家庭中,尽管几乎普及了产科随访(99.7%)和适度的产前超声筛查(59.4%),但只有48名儿童(13.3%)得到了产前诊断。产前超声筛查在产前诊断病例中更为频繁(97.9% vs. 53.5%); p结论:产前CHD检测不常见,且受筛查实践的驱动。关于胎儿超声心动图的咨询不一致,主要集中在复杂的冠心病上。这些发现突出了转诊和咨询方面的差距,支持产科和儿科心脏病服务之间加强整合的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书