Development of a short-form balance recovery confidence (SF-BRC) scale.

IF 2.7 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2026-03-03 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2026.10723
Shawn Leng-Hsien Soh, Chong Wei Ang, Clarice Zi Ying Chan, Rizka Xiang Ling Goh, Jun Jie Kuoh, Zhi Yun Lim, Hazel Xu Teng Ting, Jiaying Ho, Rumpa Boonsinsukh, Karl Martin Sattelmayer
{"title":"Development of a short-form balance recovery confidence (SF-BRC) scale.","authors":"Shawn Leng-Hsien Soh, Chong Wei Ang, Clarice Zi Ying Chan, Rizka Xiang Ling Goh, Jun Jie Kuoh, Zhi Yun Lim, Hazel Xu Teng Ting, Jiaying Ho, Rumpa Boonsinsukh, Karl Martin Sattelmayer","doi":"10.1017/cts.2026.10723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying confidence in recovering balance following destabilizing events is essential for helping older adults prevent falls. However, existing measures primarily assess balance confidence. The Balance Recovery Confidence (BRC) scale was developed to address this gap, but its length may limit clinical feasibility. This study aimed to develop and validate a Short-Form Balance Recovery Confidence (SF-BRC) scale that retains the psychometric integrity of the original version while improving practicality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional dataset comprising 309 older adults (≥ 65 years) was analyzed. Exploratory factor analysis using unweighted least squares extraction on polychoric correlations was conducted to determine the underlying factor structure. Confirmatory factor analysis using the weighted least squares mean and variance adjusted (WLSMV) estimator evaluated model fit. Rasch modeling assessed item fit, item difficulty, and person separation reliability. Criterion and convergent validity were examined through correlations with the original BRC, Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC), and Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final 7-item SF-BRC demonstrated a unidimensional structure with excellent model fit (CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.02). Internal consistency was high (<i>α</i> = 0.94), and Rasch person separation reliability was 0.93. Criterion validity with the full BRC was strong (<i>r</i> = 0.99), while convergent validity with ABC and FES-I scales was moderate, supporting theoretical distinctiveness of the construct.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SF-BRC is a psychometrically robust instrument for assessing BRC. Its strong reliability and practical utility support its use in rehabilitation, fall prevention, and community-based settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"e61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13058753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2026.10723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Identifying confidence in recovering balance following destabilizing events is essential for helping older adults prevent falls. However, existing measures primarily assess balance confidence. The Balance Recovery Confidence (BRC) scale was developed to address this gap, but its length may limit clinical feasibility. This study aimed to develop and validate a Short-Form Balance Recovery Confidence (SF-BRC) scale that retains the psychometric integrity of the original version while improving practicality.

Methods: A cross-sectional dataset comprising 309 older adults (≥ 65 years) was analyzed. Exploratory factor analysis using unweighted least squares extraction on polychoric correlations was conducted to determine the underlying factor structure. Confirmatory factor analysis using the weighted least squares mean and variance adjusted (WLSMV) estimator evaluated model fit. Rasch modeling assessed item fit, item difficulty, and person separation reliability. Criterion and convergent validity were examined through correlations with the original BRC, Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC), and Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) scales.

Results: The final 7-item SF-BRC demonstrated a unidimensional structure with excellent model fit (CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.02). Internal consistency was high (α = 0.94), and Rasch person separation reliability was 0.93. Criterion validity with the full BRC was strong (r = 0.99), while convergent validity with ABC and FES-I scales was moderate, supporting theoretical distinctiveness of the construct.

Conclusions: The SF-BRC is a psychometrically robust instrument for assessing BRC. Its strong reliability and practical utility support its use in rehabilitation, fall prevention, and community-based settings.

制定短期平衡恢复信心量表(SF-BRC)。
背景:确定在不稳定事件后恢复平衡的信心对于帮助老年人预防跌倒至关重要。然而,现有的措施主要评估平衡信心。平衡恢复信心(BRC)量表是为了解决这一差距而开发的,但其长度可能会限制临床可行性。本研究的目的是开发和验证一种短表平衡恢复信心量表(SF-BRC),该量表保留了原始版本的心理测量完整性,同时提高了实用性。方法:对309名老年人(≥65岁)的横断面数据集进行分析。探索性因子分析采用非加权最小二乘提取对多重相关性进行,以确定潜在的因素结构。验证性因子分析采用加权最小二乘均值和方差调整(WLSMV)估计评估模型拟合。Rasch模型评估了项目契合度、项目难度和人分离信度。通过与原始BRC、活动特异性平衡置信度(ABC)和国际跌倒功效量表(FES-I)的相关性来检验标准和收敛效度。结果:最终的7项SF-BRC呈现单维结构,模型拟合良好(CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.02)。内部一致性高(α = 0.94),拉什人分离信度为0.93。全BRC的标准效度很强(r = 0.99),而ABC和FES-I量表的收敛效度中等,支持该结构的理论独特性。结论:SF-BRC是一种心理测量学上可靠的评估BRC的工具。其强大的可靠性和实用性支持其在康复、跌倒预防和社区环境中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书