Transforming patient recruitment in clinical trials: Communication training to manage uncertainties about risks and benefits.

IF 2.7 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2026-03-04 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2026.10725
Ekaterina Malova, Xiaofeng Jia, Rutendo E Chimbaru, Tyler R Harrison, Kallia O Wright, Hanna Birenbaum Cooper, Susan E Morgan
{"title":"Transforming patient recruitment in clinical trials: Communication training to manage uncertainties about risks and benefits.","authors":"Ekaterina Malova, Xiaofeng Jia, Rutendo E Chimbaru, Tyler R Harrison, Kallia O Wright, Hanna Birenbaum Cooper, Susan E Morgan","doi":"10.1017/cts.2026.10725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Effective communication of risks and benefits is essential to ethical clinical trial recruitment, yet clinical research coordinators (CRCs) often lack formal training in how to navigate participant uncertainty. This study examined whether targeted communication training could enhance CRCs' ability to disclose risks and benefits clearly and ethically.</p><p><strong>Approach or design: </strong>A mixed-methods, pre-post design compared CRCs who received communication training with those in a control group.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Standardized patient (SP) interactions simulating clinical trial recruitment conversations.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty-four CRCs participated across intervention and control groups.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>A communication training program grounded, focusing on transparent disclosure, benefit framing, and participant engagement strategies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative content analysis of SP interaction transcripts guided by uncertainty management theory examined risk disclosure, mitigation strategies, benefit framing, and engagement. Frequency analysis tracked changes in the number and specificity of risk/benefit mentions over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CRCs in the intervention group demonstrated more structured and transparent risk disclosure, greater use of participant-centered benefit framing, and improved interpersonal engagement. Frequency analysis showed significant increases in both the number and specificity of risk and benefit mentions post-training. Control group CRCs showed minimal change.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Targeted communication training enhances CRCs' ability to manage participant uncertainty, improving both ethical standards and informed consent quality in clinical trial recruitment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"e58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13058756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2026.10725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Effective communication of risks and benefits is essential to ethical clinical trial recruitment, yet clinical research coordinators (CRCs) often lack formal training in how to navigate participant uncertainty. This study examined whether targeted communication training could enhance CRCs' ability to disclose risks and benefits clearly and ethically.

Approach or design: A mixed-methods, pre-post design compared CRCs who received communication training with those in a control group.

Setting: Standardized patient (SP) interactions simulating clinical trial recruitment conversations.

Participants: Twenty-four CRCs participated across intervention and control groups.

Intervention: A communication training program grounded, focusing on transparent disclosure, benefit framing, and participant engagement strategies.

Method: Qualitative content analysis of SP interaction transcripts guided by uncertainty management theory examined risk disclosure, mitigation strategies, benefit framing, and engagement. Frequency analysis tracked changes in the number and specificity of risk/benefit mentions over time.

Results: CRCs in the intervention group demonstrated more structured and transparent risk disclosure, greater use of participant-centered benefit framing, and improved interpersonal engagement. Frequency analysis showed significant increases in both the number and specificity of risk and benefit mentions post-training. Control group CRCs showed minimal change.

Conclusion: Targeted communication training enhances CRCs' ability to manage participant uncertainty, improving both ethical standards and informed consent quality in clinical trial recruitment.

转变临床试验患者招募:沟通培训以管理风险和收益的不确定性。
目的:风险和收益的有效沟通对于伦理临床试验招募至关重要,然而临床研究协调员(CRCs)往往缺乏如何应对参与者不确定性的正式培训。本研究考察了有针对性的沟通培训是否能提高csr清晰、道德地披露风险和利益的能力。方法或设计:采用混合方法,前后设计,将接受沟通培训的crc与对照组进行比较。设置:标准化的患者(SP)互动模拟临床试验招募对话。参与者:干预组和对照组共24名crc参与者。干预:基于沟通培训计划,侧重于透明披露、利益框架和参与者参与策略。方法:在不确定性管理理论的指导下,对SP相互作用转录本进行定性内容分析,检查风险披露、缓解策略、利益框架和参与。频率分析追踪了风险/益处的数量和特异性随时间的变化。结果:干预组的crc表现出更结构化和透明的风险披露,更多地使用以参与者为中心的利益框架,并改善了人际交往。频率分析显示,培训后提及风险和益处的数量和特异性都有显著增加。对照组的crc变化最小。结论:有针对性的沟通培训增强了临床研究中心管理受试者不确定性的能力,提高了临床试验招募的伦理标准和知情同意质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书