Educational impact of a structured simulation-based orthopedic training program on technical and non-technical competency development: a prospective pre-post study.

Q3 Medicine
Ionut Dudau, Dumitru Sutoi, Bogdan Chiu, Raluca Radbea, George Marin, Anda Nicoleta Ciontos, Vlad Mulcutan-Chis, Maria Sutoi, Ovidiu Alexandru Mederle, Bogdan Nicolae Deleanu
{"title":"Educational impact of a structured simulation-based orthopedic training program on technical and non-technical competency development: a prospective pre-post study.","authors":"Ionut Dudau, Dumitru Sutoi, Bogdan Chiu, Raluca Radbea, George Marin, Anda Nicoleta Ciontos, Vlad Mulcutan-Chis, Maria Sutoi, Ovidiu Alexandru Mederle, Bogdan Nicolae Deleanu","doi":"10.25122/jml-2026-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contemporary orthopedic education faces reduced clinical exposure, increasing procedural complexity, and growing emphasis on patient safety. Simulation-based learning (SBL) offers a structured alternative to traditional apprenticeship models, enabling deliberate practice and competency-based assessment. This study evaluated the educational impact of a structured, hands-on, simulation-based orthopedic workshop on the development of technical and non-technical competencies among medical students. We conducted a prospective pre-post interventional study including 70 medical students across all 6 years of training. Participants completed pre- and post-intervention assessments evaluating self-confidence in musculoskeletal trauma management, perceived technical skills, non-technical competencies (communication, teamwork, situational awareness), motivation toward orthopedics, and theoretical knowledge through a 10-item multiple-choice questionnaire. Statistical analysis employed non-parametric testing (Wilcoxon signed-rank, Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis). Effect sizes were calculated using r = Z/√N, with values > 0.5 indicating large effects. Internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Significant improvements were observed across all evaluated domains (all <i>P</i> < 0.001), with large effect sizes (r > 0.5). Confidence in musculoskeletal trauma management demonstrated the greatest increase (median 4 pre-workshop vs. 9 post-workshop). Theoretical knowledge improved in most domains. Internal consistency of the assessment instrument was excellent (Cronbach's alpha 0.896-0.961). Senior students demonstrated higher baseline and post-intervention scores compared to junior cohorts (<i>P</i> < 0.05). No significant gender-based differences were identified, except in procedural risk recognition (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Participation in a structured simulation-based orthopedic workshop was associated with meaningful multidimensional educational gains, including enhanced perceived technical competence, strengthened non-technical skills, increased confidence, and improved knowledge acquisition.</p>","PeriodicalId":16386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Life","volume":"19 2","pages":"127-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13059458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2026-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contemporary orthopedic education faces reduced clinical exposure, increasing procedural complexity, and growing emphasis on patient safety. Simulation-based learning (SBL) offers a structured alternative to traditional apprenticeship models, enabling deliberate practice and competency-based assessment. This study evaluated the educational impact of a structured, hands-on, simulation-based orthopedic workshop on the development of technical and non-technical competencies among medical students. We conducted a prospective pre-post interventional study including 70 medical students across all 6 years of training. Participants completed pre- and post-intervention assessments evaluating self-confidence in musculoskeletal trauma management, perceived technical skills, non-technical competencies (communication, teamwork, situational awareness), motivation toward orthopedics, and theoretical knowledge through a 10-item multiple-choice questionnaire. Statistical analysis employed non-parametric testing (Wilcoxon signed-rank, Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis). Effect sizes were calculated using r = Z/√N, with values > 0.5 indicating large effects. Internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Significant improvements were observed across all evaluated domains (all P < 0.001), with large effect sizes (r > 0.5). Confidence in musculoskeletal trauma management demonstrated the greatest increase (median 4 pre-workshop vs. 9 post-workshop). Theoretical knowledge improved in most domains. Internal consistency of the assessment instrument was excellent (Cronbach's alpha 0.896-0.961). Senior students demonstrated higher baseline and post-intervention scores compared to junior cohorts (P < 0.05). No significant gender-based differences were identified, except in procedural risk recognition (P < 0.001). Participation in a structured simulation-based orthopedic workshop was associated with meaningful multidimensional educational gains, including enhanced perceived technical competence, strengthened non-technical skills, increased confidence, and improved knowledge acquisition.

基于结构化模拟的骨科培训计划对技术和非技术能力发展的教育影响:一项前瞻性的前后研究。
当代骨科教育面临着临床暴露减少、手术复杂性增加和对患者安全日益重视的问题。基于模拟的学习(SBL)为传统的学徒模式提供了一种结构化的替代方案,使有意识的练习和基于能力的评估成为可能。本研究评估了一个结构化的、动手的、基于模拟的骨科研讨会对医学生技术和非技术能力发展的教育影响。我们对70名医学生进行了为期6年的前瞻性介入前后研究。参与者完成了干预前和干预后的评估,评估了肌肉骨骼创伤管理的自信、感知的技术技能、非技术能力(沟通、团队合作、态势感知)、对骨科的动机和理论知识。统计分析采用非参数检验(Wilcoxon signed-rank, Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis)。效应量采用r = Z/√N计算,> 0.5表示效应大。内部信度采用Cronbach’s alpha评估。在所有评估领域均观察到显著改善(均P < 0.001),效应量大(r < 0.05)。对肌肉骨骼创伤处理的信心表现出最大的增加(中位数为工作坊前4对工作坊后9)。大多数领域的理论知识都有所提高。评价工具的内部一致性极好(Cronbach’s alpha为0.896-0.961)。高年级学生的基线和干预后得分高于低年级学生(P < 0.05)。除程序性风险识别外,未发现显著的性别差异(P < 0.001)。参与基于结构化模拟的骨科研讨会与有意义的多维教育收益相关,包括增强感知技术能力、增强非技术技能、增强信心和改进知识获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medicine and Life
Journal of Medicine and Life Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medicine and Life publishes peer-reviewed articles from various fields of medicine and life sciences, including original research, systematic reviews, special reports, case presentations, major medical breakthroughs and letters to the editor. The Journal focuses on current matters that lie at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and strives to present this information to inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. Papers addressing topics such as neuroprotection, neurorehabilitation, neuroplasticity, and neuroregeneration are particularly encouraged, as part of the Journal''s continuous interest in neuroscience research. The Editorial Board of the Journal of Medicine and Life is open to consider manuscripts from all levels of research and areas of biological sciences, including fundamental, experimental or clinical research and matters of public health. As part of our pledge to promote an educational and community-building environment, our issues feature sections designated to informing our readers regarding exciting international congresses, teaching courses and relevant institutional-level events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书