Educational impact of a structured simulation-based orthopedic training program on technical and non-technical competency development: a prospective pre-post study.
Ionut Dudau, Dumitru Sutoi, Bogdan Chiu, Raluca Radbea, George Marin, Anda Nicoleta Ciontos, Vlad Mulcutan-Chis, Maria Sutoi, Ovidiu Alexandru Mederle, Bogdan Nicolae Deleanu
{"title":"Educational impact of a structured simulation-based orthopedic training program on technical and non-technical competency development: a prospective pre-post study.","authors":"Ionut Dudau, Dumitru Sutoi, Bogdan Chiu, Raluca Radbea, George Marin, Anda Nicoleta Ciontos, Vlad Mulcutan-Chis, Maria Sutoi, Ovidiu Alexandru Mederle, Bogdan Nicolae Deleanu","doi":"10.25122/jml-2026-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contemporary orthopedic education faces reduced clinical exposure, increasing procedural complexity, and growing emphasis on patient safety. Simulation-based learning (SBL) offers a structured alternative to traditional apprenticeship models, enabling deliberate practice and competency-based assessment. This study evaluated the educational impact of a structured, hands-on, simulation-based orthopedic workshop on the development of technical and non-technical competencies among medical students. We conducted a prospective pre-post interventional study including 70 medical students across all 6 years of training. Participants completed pre- and post-intervention assessments evaluating self-confidence in musculoskeletal trauma management, perceived technical skills, non-technical competencies (communication, teamwork, situational awareness), motivation toward orthopedics, and theoretical knowledge through a 10-item multiple-choice questionnaire. Statistical analysis employed non-parametric testing (Wilcoxon signed-rank, Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis). Effect sizes were calculated using r = Z/√N, with values > 0.5 indicating large effects. Internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Significant improvements were observed across all evaluated domains (all <i>P</i> < 0.001), with large effect sizes (r > 0.5). Confidence in musculoskeletal trauma management demonstrated the greatest increase (median 4 pre-workshop vs. 9 post-workshop). Theoretical knowledge improved in most domains. Internal consistency of the assessment instrument was excellent (Cronbach's alpha 0.896-0.961). Senior students demonstrated higher baseline and post-intervention scores compared to junior cohorts (<i>P</i> < 0.05). No significant gender-based differences were identified, except in procedural risk recognition (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Participation in a structured simulation-based orthopedic workshop was associated with meaningful multidimensional educational gains, including enhanced perceived technical competence, strengthened non-technical skills, increased confidence, and improved knowledge acquisition.</p>","PeriodicalId":16386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Life","volume":"19 2","pages":"127-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13059458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2026-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Contemporary orthopedic education faces reduced clinical exposure, increasing procedural complexity, and growing emphasis on patient safety. Simulation-based learning (SBL) offers a structured alternative to traditional apprenticeship models, enabling deliberate practice and competency-based assessment. This study evaluated the educational impact of a structured, hands-on, simulation-based orthopedic workshop on the development of technical and non-technical competencies among medical students. We conducted a prospective pre-post interventional study including 70 medical students across all 6 years of training. Participants completed pre- and post-intervention assessments evaluating self-confidence in musculoskeletal trauma management, perceived technical skills, non-technical competencies (communication, teamwork, situational awareness), motivation toward orthopedics, and theoretical knowledge through a 10-item multiple-choice questionnaire. Statistical analysis employed non-parametric testing (Wilcoxon signed-rank, Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis). Effect sizes were calculated using r = Z/√N, with values > 0.5 indicating large effects. Internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Significant improvements were observed across all evaluated domains (all P < 0.001), with large effect sizes (r > 0.5). Confidence in musculoskeletal trauma management demonstrated the greatest increase (median 4 pre-workshop vs. 9 post-workshop). Theoretical knowledge improved in most domains. Internal consistency of the assessment instrument was excellent (Cronbach's alpha 0.896-0.961). Senior students demonstrated higher baseline and post-intervention scores compared to junior cohorts (P < 0.05). No significant gender-based differences were identified, except in procedural risk recognition (P < 0.001). Participation in a structured simulation-based orthopedic workshop was associated with meaningful multidimensional educational gains, including enhanced perceived technical competence, strengthened non-technical skills, increased confidence, and improved knowledge acquisition.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Medicine and Life publishes peer-reviewed articles from various fields of medicine and life sciences, including original research, systematic reviews, special reports, case presentations, major medical breakthroughs and letters to the editor. The Journal focuses on current matters that lie at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and strives to present this information to inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. Papers addressing topics such as neuroprotection, neurorehabilitation, neuroplasticity, and neuroregeneration are particularly encouraged, as part of the Journal''s continuous interest in neuroscience research. The Editorial Board of the Journal of Medicine and Life is open to consider manuscripts from all levels of research and areas of biological sciences, including fundamental, experimental or clinical research and matters of public health. As part of our pledge to promote an educational and community-building environment, our issues feature sections designated to informing our readers regarding exciting international congresses, teaching courses and relevant institutional-level events.