Validation and Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Healthy Aging Questionnaire in Hong Kong.

IF 2 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Aging Research Pub Date : 2026-04-08 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/jare/3632426
Jed Montayre, Wenjing Ning, Ka Man Carman Leung, Chun Hei Glen Cheng, Fen Liu, Juliet Chigozie Donatus Ezulike, Kay Kuo
{"title":"Validation and Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Healthy Aging Questionnaire in Hong Kong.","authors":"Jed Montayre, Wenjing Ning, Ka Man Carman Leung, Chun Hei Glen Cheng, Fen Liu, Juliet Chigozie Donatus Ezulike, Kay Kuo","doi":"10.1155/jare/3632426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthy aging is a key public health priority in Hong Kong. The Healthy Aging Questionnaire, originally developed and validated in Singapore for older adults, is a concise tool for assessing multiple dimensions of healthy aging.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examines the psychometric performance of the Chinese version of the HAQ in the Hong Kong adult population, assessing validity, reliability, and factor structure.</p><p><strong>Research designs and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted from October to December 2024 using convenience sampling to recruit participants aged 18 and above from various communities in Hong Kong through online and offline methods. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed to determine the factor structure. Cronbach's alpha, split-half reliability, and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to assess reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Chinese version of the HAQ demonstrated face validity and content validity. An exploratory factor analysis confirmed a three-factor structure, comprising physical/mental and sense of purpose, engagement in functional activities, and engagement in social and physical activities, with a cumulative variance contribution of 58.178%. The instrument showed Cronbach's alpha was 0.827, split-half reliability was 0.697, and an intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.630. Confirmatory factor analysis validated the three-factor structure.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The Chinese version of the HAQ is a valid and reliable tool for assessing healthy aging in the Hong Kong adult population.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The robust psychometric properties support its use in research and practice to evaluate and promote healthy aging. Future studies should validate the HAQ in longitudinal research.</p>","PeriodicalId":14933,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Research","volume":"2026 ","pages":"3632426"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13058564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/jare/3632426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Healthy aging is a key public health priority in Hong Kong. The Healthy Aging Questionnaire, originally developed and validated in Singapore for older adults, is a concise tool for assessing multiple dimensions of healthy aging.

Objectives: This study examines the psychometric performance of the Chinese version of the HAQ in the Hong Kong adult population, assessing validity, reliability, and factor structure.

Research designs and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from October to December 2024 using convenience sampling to recruit participants aged 18 and above from various communities in Hong Kong through online and offline methods. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed to determine the factor structure. Cronbach's alpha, split-half reliability, and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to assess reliability.

Results: The Chinese version of the HAQ demonstrated face validity and content validity. An exploratory factor analysis confirmed a three-factor structure, comprising physical/mental and sense of purpose, engagement in functional activities, and engagement in social and physical activities, with a cumulative variance contribution of 58.178%. The instrument showed Cronbach's alpha was 0.827, split-half reliability was 0.697, and an intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.630. Confirmatory factor analysis validated the three-factor structure.

Discussion: The Chinese version of the HAQ is a valid and reliable tool for assessing healthy aging in the Hong Kong adult population.

Implications: The robust psychometric properties support its use in research and practice to evaluate and promote healthy aging. Future studies should validate the HAQ in longitudinal research.

香港健康老化问卷中文版的验证与评价。
背景:健康安老是香港公共卫生工作的重点。健康老龄化问卷最初是在新加坡为老年人开发和验证的,是评估健康老龄化多个维度的简明工具。目的:本研究考察了中文版《素质评估量表》在香港成年人中的心理测量表现,评估了效度、信度和因素结构。研究设计和方法:本研究于2024年10月至12月进行横断面研究,采用方便抽样的方法,通过线上和线下的方法,从香港不同社区招募18岁及以上的参与者。采用探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析确定因子结构。信度评估采用Cronbach’s alpha、劈半信度和类内相关系数。结果:中文版的HAQ具有正面效度和内容效度。探索性因子分析证实了生理/心理和目的感、功能活动参与、社会和身体活动参与的三因素结构,累积方差贡献率为58.178%。Cronbach’s alpha为0.827,劈半信度为0.697,类内相关系数为0.630。验证性因子分析验证了三因素结构。讨论:中文版的健康老化指数是评估香港成年人口健康老化的有效和可靠的工具。意义:强大的心理测量特性支持其在研究和实践中用于评估和促进健康老龄化。未来的研究应在纵向研究中验证HAQ。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Aging Research
Journal of Aging Research Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书