Voluntary Attention Selectively Modulates Omission Responses

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Tjerk T. Dercksen, Andreas Widmann, Nicole Wetzel
{"title":"Voluntary Attention Selectively Modulates Omission Responses","authors":"Tjerk T. Dercksen,&nbsp;Andreas Widmann,&nbsp;Nicole Wetzel","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Predictive coding conceptualizes attention as a weighting of prediction error signals. However, empirical findings on how attention influences common markers of prediction error have been inconsistent, likely because these markers are typically derived from stimulus-evoked responses. To avoid stimulus-related confounds and isolate effects related purely to prediction, we investigated how attention modulates brain responses to unexpected stimulus omissions. Using visual–auditory couplings where the auditory stimulus was occasionally omitted, we recorded EEG responses that revealed a multistage omission response—from early sensory to later higher-level prediction error activity. Voluntary attention was manipulated along two dimensions: (1) toward the visual or auditory modality, and (2) toward the moment of stimulus presentation or sustained over time. Early sensory prediction error, reflected by the omission N1, was unaffected by any manipulation of attention. In contrast, later high-level prediction error processing, reflected by omission P3 responses, was strongly affected by directing attention: robust responses were elicited when attention was directed to the auditory modality—where the prediction had been violated—but these were markedly reduced or absent when attention was directed to the visual modality. These results suggest an attentional system that does not affect low-level sensory prediction error but is capable of influencing distinct stages in the processing hierarchy in service of task performance. This first investigation of how attention affects different stages of omission activity suggests that voluntary attention may modulate prediction error processing via specific neurotransmitter systems and demonstrates this approach's potential for reliably studying precision-weighting in the brain.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"47 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13065894/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70518","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predictive coding conceptualizes attention as a weighting of prediction error signals. However, empirical findings on how attention influences common markers of prediction error have been inconsistent, likely because these markers are typically derived from stimulus-evoked responses. To avoid stimulus-related confounds and isolate effects related purely to prediction, we investigated how attention modulates brain responses to unexpected stimulus omissions. Using visual–auditory couplings where the auditory stimulus was occasionally omitted, we recorded EEG responses that revealed a multistage omission response—from early sensory to later higher-level prediction error activity. Voluntary attention was manipulated along two dimensions: (1) toward the visual or auditory modality, and (2) toward the moment of stimulus presentation or sustained over time. Early sensory prediction error, reflected by the omission N1, was unaffected by any manipulation of attention. In contrast, later high-level prediction error processing, reflected by omission P3 responses, was strongly affected by directing attention: robust responses were elicited when attention was directed to the auditory modality—where the prediction had been violated—but these were markedly reduced or absent when attention was directed to the visual modality. These results suggest an attentional system that does not affect low-level sensory prediction error but is capable of influencing distinct stages in the processing hierarchy in service of task performance. This first investigation of how attention affects different stages of omission activity suggests that voluntary attention may modulate prediction error processing via specific neurotransmitter systems and demonstrates this approach's potential for reliably studying precision-weighting in the brain.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

自愿注意选择性地调节遗漏反应。
预测编码将注意力概念化为预测误差信号的加权。然而,关于注意力如何影响预测误差的常见标记的实证研究结果并不一致,可能是因为这些标记通常来自刺激诱发的反应。为了避免刺激相关的混淆和隔离纯粹与预测相关的影响,我们研究了注意如何调节大脑对意外刺激遗漏的反应。使用视觉-听觉耦合,偶尔忽略听觉刺激,我们记录了脑电图反应,揭示了一个多阶段的遗漏反应——从早期的感觉到后来更高层次的预测误差活动。自愿性注意被操纵在两个维度上:(1)朝向视觉或听觉模式,(2)朝向刺激呈现的时刻或持续的时间。早期的感官预测误差,通过遗漏N1反映出来,不受任何注意力操纵的影响。相比之下,后来的高水平预测错误处理,通过遗漏P3反应反映出来,受到引导注意力的强烈影响:当注意力被引导到听觉模态时,预测被破坏了,会引起强烈的反应,但当注意力被引导到视觉模态时,这些反应明显减少或消失。这些结果表明,注意系统不影响低级感觉预测误差,但能够影响加工层次的不同阶段,以服务于任务绩效。这是对注意力如何影响遗漏活动不同阶段的第一次调查,表明自愿注意可能通过特定的神经递质系统调节预测错误的处理,并证明了这种方法在可靠地研究大脑中的精确度加权方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书