Understanding the burden of pulmonary arterial hypertension among patients and caregivers through narrative medicine: data from Italian multicentre observational INSPECTIO study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Laura Scelsi, Roberto Badagliacca, Marco Vicenzi, Emma Di Poi, Fabiana Baldi, Pietro Ameri, Edoardo Airò, Francesca Bux, Dagna Lorenzo, Livio Giuliani, Gian Piero Perna, Edoardo Bonsante, Carlo D'Agostino, Claudia Raineri, Piergiuseppe Agostoni, Antonietta Cappuccio, Erika Greco, Maria Giulia Marini, Matteo Biancospino, Alessia Uglietti, Stefano De Santis
{"title":"Understanding the burden of pulmonary arterial hypertension among patients and caregivers through narrative medicine: data from Italian multicentre observational INSPECTIO study.","authors":"Laura Scelsi, Roberto Badagliacca, Marco Vicenzi, Emma Di Poi, Fabiana Baldi, Pietro Ameri, Edoardo Airò, Francesca Bux, Dagna Lorenzo, Livio Giuliani, Gian Piero Perna, Edoardo Bonsante, Carlo D'Agostino, Claudia Raineri, Piergiuseppe Agostoni, Antonietta Cappuccio, Erika Greco, Maria Giulia Marini, Matteo Biancospino, Alessia Uglietti, Stefano De Santis","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A key challenge in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) research is assessing the specific impact of this condition on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), also considering the patient's subjective experience and caregiving burden. The prospective, observational, multicentre Non-INterventional Study on Pulmonary arterial hypertension patients treated with macitentan and/or selexipag: ExperienCe from an ITalIan cOhort (INSPECTIO) study integrated narratives with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical data to gain deeper insight into patients' experiences of PAH, also involving caregivers' perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted across 29 Italian hospital-based centres and enrolled adult patients with PAH already on treatment with macitentan and/or selexipag as part of combination therapy. A dedicated narrative collection was carried out within the larger study. Patient and caregiver narratives were collected at enrolment (visit 1; V1) and at 12 months (visit 3; V3), then analysed through MAXQDA software and correlated with emPHasis-10 questionnaire scores and clinical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 186 patients enrolled in the overall INSPECTIO study, 96/186 (52%) completed the narrative at V1 and 58/186 (31%) at V3; 29/54 (54%) caregivers completed the narrative at V1 and 16/54 (30%) at V3. The analysis revealed an alignment between patient narratives and emPHasis-10 scores. Specifically, at V3, emPHasis-10 scores were higher for patients who did not mention their domestic life in narratives, reported feelings of shame or isolation, limitations or breathlessness also in daily activities and reported ongoing treatment-related issues. Nonetheless, at V3, 36/58 (62%) of patients described living with PAH as manageable. The care pathway showed a positive impact on caregivers: their narratives indicated a shift from V1 to V3, with improved perceptions of the care relationship and PAH therapies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>INSPECTIO is the first study to integrate narratives, PROs and clinical data in PAH research. Findings suggested that appropriate support and therapeutic management are crucial to help patients cope with the condition. Narratives have proven to be a valuable tool for understanding the impact of PAH and improving its management, providing insights that can inform a more patient-centred approach.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04567602.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13084868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003377","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A key challenge in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) research is assessing the specific impact of this condition on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), also considering the patient's subjective experience and caregiving burden. The prospective, observational, multicentre Non-INterventional Study on Pulmonary arterial hypertension patients treated with macitentan and/or selexipag: ExperienCe from an ITalIan cOhort (INSPECTIO) study integrated narratives with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical data to gain deeper insight into patients' experiences of PAH, also involving caregivers' perspectives.

Methods: The study was conducted across 29 Italian hospital-based centres and enrolled adult patients with PAH already on treatment with macitentan and/or selexipag as part of combination therapy. A dedicated narrative collection was carried out within the larger study. Patient and caregiver narratives were collected at enrolment (visit 1; V1) and at 12 months (visit 3; V3), then analysed through MAXQDA software and correlated with emPHasis-10 questionnaire scores and clinical data.

Results: Out of the 186 patients enrolled in the overall INSPECTIO study, 96/186 (52%) completed the narrative at V1 and 58/186 (31%) at V3; 29/54 (54%) caregivers completed the narrative at V1 and 16/54 (30%) at V3. The analysis revealed an alignment between patient narratives and emPHasis-10 scores. Specifically, at V3, emPHasis-10 scores were higher for patients who did not mention their domestic life in narratives, reported feelings of shame or isolation, limitations or breathlessness also in daily activities and reported ongoing treatment-related issues. Nonetheless, at V3, 36/58 (62%) of patients described living with PAH as manageable. The care pathway showed a positive impact on caregivers: their narratives indicated a shift from V1 to V3, with improved perceptions of the care relationship and PAH therapies.

Conclusion: INSPECTIO is the first study to integrate narratives, PROs and clinical data in PAH research. Findings suggested that appropriate support and therapeutic management are crucial to help patients cope with the condition. Narratives have proven to be a valuable tool for understanding the impact of PAH and improving its management, providing insights that can inform a more patient-centred approach.

Trial registration number: NCT04567602.

通过叙事医学了解患者和护理人员肺动脉高压的负担:来自意大利多中心观察性INSPECTIO研究的数据
肺动脉高压(PAH)研究的一个关键挑战是评估这种情况对健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的具体影响,同时考虑患者的主观经历和护理负担。这项前瞻性、观察性、多中心的非介入性研究是针对接受马西坦和/或selexipag治疗的肺动脉高压患者:来自意大利队列研究(INSPECTIO)的经验,该研究结合了患者报告的结果(PROs)和临床数据,以更深入地了解患者的PAH经历,也包括护理人员的观点。方法:该研究在意大利29家医院中心进行,招募了已经接受马西坦和/或selexipag联合治疗的PAH成年患者。在更大的研究中进行了专门的叙事收集。在入组时(访问1;V1)和12个月时(访问3;V3)收集患者和护理人员的叙述,然后通过MAXQDA软件进行分析,并与emPHasis-10问卷得分和临床数据进行相关分析。结果:在纳入整个INSPECTIO研究的186例患者中,96/186(52%)在V1完成叙事,58/186(31%)在V3完成叙事;29/54(54%)的照护者在V1完成叙述,16/54(30%)在V3完成叙述。分析揭示了患者叙述与强调-10评分之间的一致性。具体来说,在V3级,那些在叙述中没有提及家庭生活、报告感到羞耻或孤立、在日常活动中也有限制或呼吸困难以及报告正在进行的治疗相关问题的患者的强调-10得分更高。尽管如此,在V3阶段,36/58(62%)的患者认为PAH是可控的。护理途径对护理者表现出积极的影响:他们的叙述表明从V1到V3的转变,改善了对护理关系和多环芳烃治疗的看法。结论:INSPECTIO是首个在PAH研究中整合叙事、PROs和临床数据的研究。研究结果表明,适当的支持和治疗管理对于帮助患者应对这种情况至关重要。叙述已被证明是了解多环芳烃影响和改善其管理的宝贵工具,它提供的见解可以为更加以患者为中心的方法提供信息。试验注册号:NCT04567602。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书