Lindsay C Morton, Brett M Forshey, Katharina E Klinkhammer, Andrew Romaner, Zoumanna Traore, Laurie J Hartman, Claire J Standley, Amira A Roess
{"title":"Local genomic epidemiology investigations of SARS-CoV-2 during the early pandemic response: A global systematic review.","authors":"Lindsay C Morton, Brett M Forshey, Katharina E Klinkhammer, Andrew Romaner, Zoumanna Traore, Laurie J Hartman, Claire J Standley, Amira A Roess","doi":"10.1017/S0950268826101381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genomic epidemiology was essential for characterizing SARS-CoV-2 transmission during the early COVID-19 pandemic. This systematic review examined how whole-genome sequencing was used in local outbreak investigations published between March 2020 and March 2021. Searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified 32 studies from 18 countries that integrated genomic and epidemiological data for local outbreak investigations. Most studies were conducted in healthcare settings or in high-income countries. A limited number of studies were conducted in low- and middle-income countries, except for China and Vietnam. Illumina or Oxford Nanopore platforms and tiled-amplicon protocols were the most common sequencing methods. Phylogenetic trees were the most common genomic epidemiology analytical approach. Genomic data enabled confirmation of suspected transmission links, detection of multiple introductions, and identification of asymptomatic or presymptomatic transmission. Important enablers of early implementation included open-access genomics databases, standardized protocols (e.g. ARTIC), open-source tools (e.g. Nextstrain), and cross-sector partnerships and funding. Study quality and adherence to common observational study reporting guidelines varied widely. Familiarity with the STROME-ID guidelines for molecular epidemiology studies would have improved overall quality. These findings highlight the utility of genomic epidemiology in outbreak response and support its continued integration into public health surveillance systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":11721,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":"e56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13161826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268826101381","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Genomic epidemiology was essential for characterizing SARS-CoV-2 transmission during the early COVID-19 pandemic. This systematic review examined how whole-genome sequencing was used in local outbreak investigations published between March 2020 and March 2021. Searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified 32 studies from 18 countries that integrated genomic and epidemiological data for local outbreak investigations. Most studies were conducted in healthcare settings or in high-income countries. A limited number of studies were conducted in low- and middle-income countries, except for China and Vietnam. Illumina or Oxford Nanopore platforms and tiled-amplicon protocols were the most common sequencing methods. Phylogenetic trees were the most common genomic epidemiology analytical approach. Genomic data enabled confirmation of suspected transmission links, detection of multiple introductions, and identification of asymptomatic or presymptomatic transmission. Important enablers of early implementation included open-access genomics databases, standardized protocols (e.g. ARTIC), open-source tools (e.g. Nextstrain), and cross-sector partnerships and funding. Study quality and adherence to common observational study reporting guidelines varied widely. Familiarity with the STROME-ID guidelines for molecular epidemiology studies would have improved overall quality. These findings highlight the utility of genomic epidemiology in outbreak response and support its continued integration into public health surveillance systems.
基因组流行病学对于表征COVID-19大流行早期SARS-CoV-2的传播至关重要。本系统综述研究了在2020年3月至2021年3月期间发表的当地疫情调查中如何使用全基因组测序。对PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science的搜索确定了来自18个国家的32项研究,这些研究整合了基因组和流行病学数据,用于当地的疫情调查。大多数研究是在卫生保健机构或高收入国家进行的。除中国和越南外,在低收入和中等收入国家进行了数量有限的研究。Illumina或Oxford纳米孔平台和平铺扩增子协议是最常用的测序方法。系统发育树是最常用的基因组流行病学分析方法。基因组数据能够确认疑似传播环节,发现多重引入,并识别无症状或症状前传播。早期实施的重要推动因素包括开放获取基因组数据库、标准化协议(如ARTIC)、开源工具(如Nextstrain)以及跨部门伙伴关系和资金。研究质量和对常见观察性研究报告指南的依从性差异很大。熟悉STROME-ID分子流行病学研究指南可以提高总体质量。这些发现突出了基因组流行病学在疫情应对中的作用,并支持将其继续纳入公共卫生监测系统。
期刊介绍:
Epidemiology & Infection publishes original reports and reviews on all aspects of infection in humans and animals. Particular emphasis is given to the epidemiology, prevention and control of infectious diseases. The scope covers the zoonoses, outbreaks, food hygiene, vaccine studies, statistics and the clinical, social and public-health aspects of infectious disease, as well as some tropical infections. It has become the key international periodical in which to find the latest reports on recently discovered infections and new technology. For those concerned with policy and planning for the control of infections, the papers on mathematical modelling of epidemics caused by historical, current and emergent infections are of particular value.