Regression of Recalcitrant Corneal Neovascularization and Graft Revival With Systemic Bevacizumab: A Case Report.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Cornea Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-30 DOI:10.1097/ICO.0000000000004158
Evita Muller, Poonam Sharma, Leo Feinberg, Shakeel Ahmad, Katherine Scatchard, Neil Bowley, Mitra Tavakoli, Harry Roberts
{"title":"Regression of Recalcitrant Corneal Neovascularization and Graft Revival With Systemic Bevacizumab: A Case Report.","authors":"Evita Muller, Poonam Sharma, Leo Feinberg, Shakeel Ahmad, Katherine Scatchard, Neil Bowley, Mitra Tavakoli, Harry Roberts","doi":"10.1097/ICO.0000000000004158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Corneal neovascularization is a sight-threatening pathology arising from various conditions and compromises keratoplasty survival. Treating neovascularization is critical for graft outcomes; however, both medical and surgical interventions often fail in severe cases. We report the first known case of regression of corneal neovascularisation associated with systemic bevacizumab accompanied by unexpected recovery of a previously failed Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 64-year-old woman presented with right eye bullous keratopathy and deep stromal neovascularization after phakic intraocular lens implantation. Corneal neovascularization persisted despite phakic intraocular lens explantation, vessel cautery, and subconjunctival bevacizumab. The patient subsequently underwent combined phacoemulsification and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), which failed secondary to graft rejection despite intensive topical steroid therapy. Further local therapies, including repeat vessel cautery and intrastromal bevacizumab, were unsuccessful. The patient was later diagnosed with ovarian cancer and treated with systemic bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After systemic therapy for ovarian cancer, the deep stromal vascularization markedly regressed, together with complete resolution of the corneal edema. Central corneal thickness improved from 1111 μm at rejection to 510 μm. Importantly, this represented not only vascular regression but functional recovery of a DMEK that had remained edematous for 10 months and had been considered irreversibly rejected. Visual acuity remained limited (0.8 logMAR) by residual central lipid keratopathy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This case demonstrates significant regression of deep established corneal neovascularization in a failed DMEK after systemic bevacizumab previously refractory to local therapy and apparent revival of a previously failed DMEK. To our knowledge, this represents the first reported case of systemic bevacizumab, administered as part of a triple systemic anticancer therapy, associated with regression of advanced corneal neovascularization and recovery of corneal clarify after DMEK failure. Although causality cannot be definitively established, the temporal association suggests a potential adjunctive role for systemic anti-VEGF therapy in selected cases of refractory corneal neovascularization and possibly restore function in transplants thought to have failed irreversibly.</p>","PeriodicalId":10710,"journal":{"name":"Cornea","volume":" ","pages":"1432-1436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornea","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000004158","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Corneal neovascularization is a sight-threatening pathology arising from various conditions and compromises keratoplasty survival. Treating neovascularization is critical for graft outcomes; however, both medical and surgical interventions often fail in severe cases. We report the first known case of regression of corneal neovascularisation associated with systemic bevacizumab accompanied by unexpected recovery of a previously failed Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK).

Methods: A 64-year-old woman presented with right eye bullous keratopathy and deep stromal neovascularization after phakic intraocular lens implantation. Corneal neovascularization persisted despite phakic intraocular lens explantation, vessel cautery, and subconjunctival bevacizumab. The patient subsequently underwent combined phacoemulsification and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), which failed secondary to graft rejection despite intensive topical steroid therapy. Further local therapies, including repeat vessel cautery and intrastromal bevacizumab, were unsuccessful. The patient was later diagnosed with ovarian cancer and treated with systemic bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel.

Results: After systemic therapy for ovarian cancer, the deep stromal vascularization markedly regressed, together with complete resolution of the corneal edema. Central corneal thickness improved from 1111 μm at rejection to 510 μm. Importantly, this represented not only vascular regression but functional recovery of a DMEK that had remained edematous for 10 months and had been considered irreversibly rejected. Visual acuity remained limited (0.8 logMAR) by residual central lipid keratopathy.

Discussion: This case demonstrates significant regression of deep established corneal neovascularization in a failed DMEK after systemic bevacizumab previously refractory to local therapy and apparent revival of a previously failed DMEK. To our knowledge, this represents the first reported case of systemic bevacizumab, administered as part of a triple systemic anticancer therapy, associated with regression of advanced corneal neovascularization and recovery of corneal clarify after DMEK failure. Although causality cannot be definitively established, the temporal association suggests a potential adjunctive role for systemic anti-VEGF therapy in selected cases of refractory corneal neovascularization and possibly restore function in transplants thought to have failed irreversibly.

系统性贝伐单抗治疗顽固性角膜新生血管的消退和移植物的恢复:1例报告。
目的:角膜新生血管是一种由各种情况引起的威胁视力的病理,并危及角膜移植术的生存。治疗新生血管是移植物预后的关键;然而,在严重的情况下,医疗和手术干预往往失败。我们报告了第一例已知的角膜新生血管退化与全身贝伐单抗相关,并伴有先前失败的Descemet膜内皮角膜移植术(DMEK)的意外恢复。方法:一名64岁女性患者在晶状体植入术后出现右眼大疱性角膜病变并伴有深部间质新生血管形成。尽管有晶状体人工晶状体植入术、血管烧灼术和结膜下贝伐单抗治疗,角膜新生血管仍然存在。患者随后接受了联合超声乳化术和Descemet膜内皮角膜移植术(DMEK),尽管进行了强化的局部类固醇治疗,但由于移植物排斥反应失败。进一步的局部治疗,包括重复血管烧灼和上皮内贝伐单抗,都没有成功。该患者后来被诊断为卵巢癌,并接受全身贝伐单抗、卡铂和紫杉醇治疗。结果:卵巢癌经全身治疗后,角膜深层间质血管化明显恢复,角膜水肿完全消退。角膜中央厚度由排斥时的1111 μm提高到510 μm。重要的是,这不仅表明血管消退,而且表明水肿10个月的DMEK功能恢复,被认为是不可逆转的排斥。由于残留的中央脂质性角膜病变,视力仍然有限(0.8 logMAR)。讨论:该病例表明,在系统性贝伐单抗治疗后,失败的DMEK深层建立的角膜新生血管明显消退,并且先前失败的DMEK明显恢复。据我们所知,这是第一例报道的全身贝伐单抗,作为三联全身抗癌治疗的一部分,与DMEK失败后晚期角膜新生血管的消退和角膜清洁的恢复有关。虽然因果关系不能确定,但时间关联表明,在难治性角膜新生血管形成的特定病例中,全身性抗vegf治疗具有潜在的辅助作用,并可能恢复被认为不可逆转失败的移植的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cornea
Cornea 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
354
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: For corneal specialists and for all general ophthalmologists with an interest in this exciting subspecialty, Cornea brings together the latest clinical and basic research on the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye. Each volume is peer-reviewed by Cornea''s board of world-renowned experts and fully indexed in archival format. Your subscription brings you the latest developments in your field and a growing library of valuable professional references. Sponsored by The Cornea Society which was founded as the Castroviejo Cornea Society in 1975.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书