A closed-head, rotational traumatic brain injury model demonstrates deficits in righting reflex, neurological function, and auditory brainstem responses in rats.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Brain injury Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-10 DOI:10.1080/02699052.2026.2654216
Michelle L Bordas, Grant D Broeckel, Katherine Sherman, Alok Shah, Matthew D Budde, Christina L Runge, Brian D Stemper, Christopher J Roberts
{"title":"A closed-head, rotational traumatic brain injury model demonstrates deficits in righting reflex, neurological function, and auditory brainstem responses in rats.","authors":"Michelle L Bordas, Grant D Broeckel, Katherine Sherman, Alok Shah, Matthew D Budde, Christina L Runge, Brian D Stemper, Christopher J Roberts","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2026.2654216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is incompletely understood and warrants further investigation with preclinical models that recapitulate aspects of the human condition. Therefore, our goal was to quantify the initial presentation of deficits in a closed-head rotational TBI model in male and female rats in return of righting reflex (RORR) and global neurological function including gross sound reflex scores as a measure of acoustic startle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 116 rats (43 female) were included in this study that underwent TBI (<i>n</i> = 53), Sham (<i>n</i> = 42), or No Anesthesia control (<i>n</i> = 21) procedures to assess RORR, the Revised Neurobehavioral Severity Scale (NSS-R), or Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TBI rats had a trend toward a prolonged RORR, which was significantly increased in the TBI compared to control group when normalized to the duration of anesthesia. Gross neurological function was impaired in TBI rats, such that descriptively the largest component was due to acoustic startle deficits. These deficits were not explained by worse (higher) hearing thresholds in auditory brainstem responses, although TBI rats had increased thresholds at 16 and 20 kHz, and a trend at 10 kHz compared to Shams on post-TBI day 1 that was not different by day 8.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This model reproduces acoustic startle, and hearing impairment aspects of human TBI that influence quality of life. Additional studies are necessary to integrate variables from new clinical classification systems including blood-based and imaging biomarkers to aid in the translation to improve patient-oriented outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"684-696"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13496039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2026.2654216","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is incompletely understood and warrants further investigation with preclinical models that recapitulate aspects of the human condition. Therefore, our goal was to quantify the initial presentation of deficits in a closed-head rotational TBI model in male and female rats in return of righting reflex (RORR) and global neurological function including gross sound reflex scores as a measure of acoustic startle.

Methods: A total of 116 rats (43 female) were included in this study that underwent TBI (n = 53), Sham (n = 42), or No Anesthesia control (n = 21) procedures to assess RORR, the Revised Neurobehavioral Severity Scale (NSS-R), or Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR).

Results: TBI rats had a trend toward a prolonged RORR, which was significantly increased in the TBI compared to control group when normalized to the duration of anesthesia. Gross neurological function was impaired in TBI rats, such that descriptively the largest component was due to acoustic startle deficits. These deficits were not explained by worse (higher) hearing thresholds in auditory brainstem responses, although TBI rats had increased thresholds at 16 and 20 kHz, and a trend at 10 kHz compared to Shams on post-TBI day 1 that was not different by day 8.

Conclusions: This model reproduces acoustic startle, and hearing impairment aspects of human TBI that influence quality of life. Additional studies are necessary to integrate variables from new clinical classification systems including blood-based and imaging biomarkers to aid in the translation to improve patient-oriented outcomes.

闭头、旋转创伤性脑损伤模型显示了大鼠的翻正反射、神经功能和听觉脑干反应的缺陷。
目的:外伤性脑损伤(TBI)的病理生理尚不完全清楚,需要进一步研究临床前模型,以概括人类状况的各个方面。因此,我们的目标是量化闭式头部旋转TBI模型中雄性和雌性大鼠的恢复反射(RORR)和整体神经功能的初始表现缺陷,包括作为声惊吓测量的总声音反射评分。方法:本研究共纳入116只大鼠(43只雌性),这些大鼠接受了TBI (n = 53)、假手术(n = 42)或无麻醉控制(n = 21)的治疗,以评估RORR、修订神经行为严重程度量表(NSS-R)或听觉脑干反应(ABR)。结果:脑外伤大鼠的RORR有延长的趋势,与麻醉时间归一化后,与对照组相比,脑外伤大鼠的RORR明显增加。脑外伤大鼠的总体神经功能受损,因此最大的组成部分是由于声惊吓缺陷。这些缺陷不能用听觉脑干反应中更差(更高)的听力阈值来解释,尽管TBI大鼠在16和20 kHz时的阈值增加,并且在TBI后第1天与Shams相比,在10 kHz时的趋势在第8天没有不同。结论:该模型再现了影响生活质量的人类TBI的声惊和听力损伤方面。需要进一步的研究来整合来自新的临床分类系统的变量,包括血液和成像生物标志物,以帮助翻译以改善以患者为导向的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain injury
Brain injury 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
148
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书