A Review of Probability of Detection Evaluation for Acoustic Emission and Ultrasonic Testing in Composite Structures: Context-Dependent Reliability for Inspection Planning

IF 3 3区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING
Jan Lean Tai
{"title":"A Review of Probability of Detection Evaluation for Acoustic Emission and Ultrasonic Testing in Composite Structures: Context-Dependent Reliability for Inspection Planning","authors":"Jan Lean Tai","doi":"10.1007/s10921-026-01356-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The probability of detection (POD) is widely adopted as a central reliability metric in non-destructive evaluation (NDE). However, existing review literature often treats POD as a comparable performance indicator across inspection modalities without sufficiently accounting for the contextual variability. This review advances a reliability-oriented synthesis by integrating detection physics, statistical modeling assumptions, and contextual drivers into a unified framework for interpreting POD in Acoustic Emission Testing (AET) and Ultrasonic Testing (UT). A fundamental distinction is established between the event-driven “Monitoring POD” characteristic of passive AET and the stimulus–response “Inspection POD” associated with active UT. These modalities differ in both sensing mechanisms and statistical formulations, such as hit–miss and â versus a approaches. They also exhibit varying sensitivities to contextual factors, including loading regimes, defect morphology, and environmental conditions. From this perspective, context is defined as a combined set of physical, operational, and human variables that condition the detection probability. Rather than ranking techniques by nominal a₉₀/₉₅ values, this review proposes a Context-Dependent POD (CDPOD) framework that clarifies how similar numerical metrics may arise from fundamentally different detection environments. A comparative synthesis of representative studies demonstrates that apparent performance differences frequently reflect contextual misalignment rather than intrinsic technique superiority, thereby limiting direct cross-modality comparison and transferability of laboratory-derived POD values to field applications. By reframing the POD as a context-sensitive reliability construct rather than a standalone scalar metric, this review provides a structured basis for inspection planning, uncertainty interpretation, and engineering decision-making in composite systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation","volume":"45 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10921-026-01356-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The probability of detection (POD) is widely adopted as a central reliability metric in non-destructive evaluation (NDE). However, existing review literature often treats POD as a comparable performance indicator across inspection modalities without sufficiently accounting for the contextual variability. This review advances a reliability-oriented synthesis by integrating detection physics, statistical modeling assumptions, and contextual drivers into a unified framework for interpreting POD in Acoustic Emission Testing (AET) and Ultrasonic Testing (UT). A fundamental distinction is established between the event-driven “Monitoring POD” characteristic of passive AET and the stimulus–response “Inspection POD” associated with active UT. These modalities differ in both sensing mechanisms and statistical formulations, such as hit–miss and â versus a approaches. They also exhibit varying sensitivities to contextual factors, including loading regimes, defect morphology, and environmental conditions. From this perspective, context is defined as a combined set of physical, operational, and human variables that condition the detection probability. Rather than ranking techniques by nominal a₉₀/₉₅ values, this review proposes a Context-Dependent POD (CDPOD) framework that clarifies how similar numerical metrics may arise from fundamentally different detection environments. A comparative synthesis of representative studies demonstrates that apparent performance differences frequently reflect contextual misalignment rather than intrinsic technique superiority, thereby limiting direct cross-modality comparison and transferability of laboratory-derived POD values to field applications. By reframing the POD as a context-sensitive reliability construct rather than a standalone scalar metric, this review provides a structured basis for inspection planning, uncertainty interpretation, and engineering decision-making in composite systems.

复合材料结构声发射和超声检测的检测概率评估综述:检测计划的上下文依赖可靠性
在无损检测中,检测概率(POD)作为一种核心的可靠性度量被广泛采用。然而,现有的综述文献通常将POD视为跨检查模式的可比性能指标,而没有充分考虑上下文的可变性。本文提出了一种以可靠性为导向的综合方法,将检测物理、统计建模假设和上下文驱动因素整合到一个统一的框架中,用于解释声发射检测(AET)和超声检测(UT)中的POD。在被动AET的事件驱动的“监测POD”特征和与主动UT相关的刺激反应“检查POD”之间建立了一个根本的区别。这些模式在传感机制和统计公式方面有所不同,例如命中-未命中和相对- a方法。它们还表现出对环境因素的不同敏感性,包括加载制度、缺陷形态和环境条件。从这个角度来看,上下文被定义为限制检测概率的物理、操作和人为变量的组合集。本文不是通过标称的₉₀/₉₅值对技术进行排名,而是提出了一个与上下文相关的POD (CDPOD)框架,该框架阐明了如何从根本不同的检测环境中产生类似的数值指标。代表性研究的比较综合表明,明显的性能差异通常反映的是上下文偏差,而不是内在的技术优势,从而限制了直接的跨模态比较和实验室衍生的POD值在现场应用中的可转移性。通过将POD重新定义为上下文敏感的可靠性结构,而不是一个独立的标量度量,本综述为复合系统中的检查计划、不确定性解释和工程决策提供了结构化的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
67
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation provides a forum for the broad range of scientific and engineering activities involved in developing a quantitative nondestructive evaluation (NDE) capability. This interdisciplinary journal publishes papers on the development of new equipment, analyses, and approaches to nondestructive measurements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书