Linking psychological distress and multilevel socioeconomic disadvantage: A representative population-based study of 15,851 U.K. adults.

IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Emma K Bridger,John Maltby,Eiko I Fried,Omid V Ebrahimi,Ludvig Daae Bjørndal
{"title":"Linking psychological distress and multilevel socioeconomic disadvantage: A representative population-based study of 15,851 U.K. adults.","authors":"Emma K Bridger,John Maltby,Eiko I Fried,Omid V Ebrahimi,Ludvig Daae Bjørndal","doi":"10.1037/amp0001705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite extensive attention on psychological distress and socioeconomic disadvantage, no study has mapped conditional associations between specific distress symptoms and disadvantage across both household and neighborhood levels. Here, we estimated a preregistered network analysis to examine the conditional associations between eight specific aspects of psychological distress on the one hand and 15 household- (e.g., household crowding, income, financial ability to keep house warm in winter) and neighborhood-level (e.g., area-level deprivation, perceptions of pollution, vandalism) disadvantage variables on the other, using the U.K. Household Longitudinal Study (N = 15,851). Limitations on social activities and daily roles as a result of emotional and physical health problems were most strongly interconnected with socioeconomic disadvantage while feeling depressed showed no conditional associations with disadvantage. Being unable to afford replacement of large electrical items was the disadvantage variable most associated with distress, including sleep loss and worthlessness. Distress variables were associated with aspects of disadvantage across both the neighborhood and household levels, although the latter associations were more frequent and stronger. Our findings highlight a core role for functional impairments due to emotional problems and underline the need to assess and address the psychological consequences of socioeconomic circumstances across multiple levels. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":"115 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001705","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite extensive attention on psychological distress and socioeconomic disadvantage, no study has mapped conditional associations between specific distress symptoms and disadvantage across both household and neighborhood levels. Here, we estimated a preregistered network analysis to examine the conditional associations between eight specific aspects of psychological distress on the one hand and 15 household- (e.g., household crowding, income, financial ability to keep house warm in winter) and neighborhood-level (e.g., area-level deprivation, perceptions of pollution, vandalism) disadvantage variables on the other, using the U.K. Household Longitudinal Study (N = 15,851). Limitations on social activities and daily roles as a result of emotional and physical health problems were most strongly interconnected with socioeconomic disadvantage while feeling depressed showed no conditional associations with disadvantage. Being unable to afford replacement of large electrical items was the disadvantage variable most associated with distress, including sleep loss and worthlessness. Distress variables were associated with aspects of disadvantage across both the neighborhood and household levels, although the latter associations were more frequent and stronger. Our findings highlight a core role for functional impairments due to emotional problems and underline the need to assess and address the psychological consequences of socioeconomic circumstances across multiple levels. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
将心理困扰与多层次社会经济劣势联系起来:一项基于15851名英国成年人的代表性人群研究。
尽管人们广泛关注心理困扰和社会经济劣势,但没有研究在家庭和社区层面上绘制特定困扰症状和劣势之间的条件关联。在这里,我们使用英国家庭纵向研究(N = 15,851)估计了一个预注册的网络分析,以检查心理困扰的八个特定方面与15个家庭(例如,家庭拥挤,收入,冬季保持房屋温暖的经济能力)和社区层面(例如,区域层面的剥夺,对污染的看法,故意破坏)不利变量之间的条件关联。由于情绪和身体健康问题导致的社会活动和日常角色的限制与社会经济劣势的联系最为密切,而感到沮丧与社会经济劣势没有条件关联。没有能力更换大型电器是最容易导致痛苦的不利因素,包括睡眠不足和生活价值降低。苦恼变量与社区和家庭层面的不利因素有关,尽管后者的关联更频繁、更强。我们的研究结果强调了由情绪问题引起的功能障碍的核心作用,并强调了评估和解决多层次社会经济环境的心理后果的必要性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Psychologist
American Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
18.50
自引率
1.20%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: Established in 1946, American Psychologist® is the flagship peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the American Psychological Association. It publishes high-impact papers of broad interest, including empirical reports, meta-analyses, and scholarly reviews, covering psychological science, practice, education, and policy. Articles often address issues of national and international significance within the field of psychology and its relationship to society. Published in an accessible style, contributions in American Psychologist are designed to be understood by both psychologists and the general public.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书