Gregory J. Benner, Keith Smolkowski, Jill Allor, Stephanie Al Otaiba, June L. Preast, Jason W. Small, Stephanie B. Hermecz, Lisa A. Strycker
{"title":"Impact of a Comprehensive and Flexible Intervention for Students With Disabilities Experiencing Intensive Literacy Needs","authors":"Gregory J. Benner, Keith Smolkowski, Jill Allor, Stephanie Al Otaiba, June L. Preast, Jason W. Small, Stephanie B. Hermecz, Lisa A. Strycker","doi":"10.1177/07419325261420807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students with disabilities who experience significant early literacy challenges need structured reading instruction. This study documents the initial efficacy of <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Friends on the Block</jats:italic> ( <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"www.friendsontheblock.com\">www.friendsontheblock.com</jats:ext-link> ), a comprehensive and flexible program designed for students with intensive early literacy needs. Elementary-age students with disabilities and intensive early literacy needs, including those with intellectual and developmental disabilities, were randomly assigned to either the <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Friends on the Block</jats:italic> intervention group ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n</jats:italic> = 31) or the standard business-as-usual instruction group ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n</jats:italic> = 31). The analysis revealed statistically and educationally significant differences favoring <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Friends on the Block</jats:italic> on two out of five measures of phonological awareness and all measures of decoding, word reading fluency, and comprehension. Except for one measure of listening comprehension, no differences were found on measures of language or vocabulary. Findings support increased literacy expectations for students with disabilities who require intensive literacy support, including those with intellectual and developmental disabilities.","PeriodicalId":48042,"journal":{"name":"Remedial and Special Education","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remedial and Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325261420807","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Students with disabilities who experience significant early literacy challenges need structured reading instruction. This study documents the initial efficacy of Friends on the Block ( www.friendsontheblock.com ), a comprehensive and flexible program designed for students with intensive early literacy needs. Elementary-age students with disabilities and intensive early literacy needs, including those with intellectual and developmental disabilities, were randomly assigned to either the Friends on the Block intervention group ( n = 31) or the standard business-as-usual instruction group ( n = 31). The analysis revealed statistically and educationally significant differences favoring Friends on the Block on two out of five measures of phonological awareness and all measures of decoding, word reading fluency, and comprehension. Except for one measure of listening comprehension, no differences were found on measures of language or vocabulary. Findings support increased literacy expectations for students with disabilities who require intensive literacy support, including those with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
期刊介绍:
Remedial and Special Education (RASE) is devoted to the discussion of issues involving the education of persons for whom typical instruction is not effective. Emphasis is on the interpretation of research literature and recommendations for the practice of remedial and special education. Appropriate topics include, but are not limited to, definition, identification, assessment, characteristics, management, and instruction of underachieving and exceptional children, youth, and adults; related services; family involvement; service delivery systems; legislation; litigation; and professional standards and training.